[WSBARP] WSBARP Digest, Vol 78, Issue 7
Stephen Whitehouse
swhite8893 at aol.com
Wed Mar 10 09:12:35 PST 2021
I have had a number of cases with the Northwest Justice Project. I have found them very good to work with. They are understaffed and overworked, and sometimes will assert positionsI disagree with. Who hasn't. But I think they care about their clients and are willing to engage in reasonable discussions. I do not know if what they proposed is common for them, but they are giving you a road to a resolution and at the same time getting something for their clients.
Steve
Stephen WhitehouseWhitehouse & Nichols, LLPP.O. Box 1273601 W. Railroad Ave.Shelton, Wa. 98584360-426-5885
swhite8893 at aol.com
-----Original Message-----
From: wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Sent: Wed, Mar 10, 2021 8:54 am
Subject: WSBARP Digest, Vol 78, Issue 7
Send WSBARP mailing list submissions to
wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
wsbarp-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of WSBARP digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
(Scott Russon)
2. Re: Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
(Kaitlyn Jackson)
3. Re: lfp problem (Gregory L. Ursich)
4. Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes (Samuel M. Meyler)
5. Re: Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
(michael at westseattleattorney.com)
6. Re: Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes (marc holmeslawgroup.com)
7. Re: Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes (Samuel M. Meyler)
8. Re: Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes (Robert R. Cole)
9. Re: Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes (Samuel M. Meyler)
10. Re: Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes (Scott Osborne)
11. Re: WSBARP Digest, Vol 78, Issue 6 (Stephen Whitehouse)
12. Condo dues foreclosure (Craig Gourley)
13. Re: Condo dues foreclosure (Samuel M. Meyler)
14. Re: Condo dues foreclosure (Craig Gourley)
15. Re: WSBARP Digest, Vol 78, Issue 6 (Jeff at bellanddavispllc.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 20:10:51 +0000
From: Scott Russon <scott at yatesmarshall.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v
Drury
Message-ID:
<MWHPR1301MB2047883B65276C457C7F346EB4929 at MWHPR1301MB2047.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
A few days before my hearing to evict (based solely on the 60 day notice of intent to sell - scheduled for Feb 12th) I received a NOA, a tenant declaration complying the with the CDC requirements, and an 8 page answer from a Northwest Justice Project attorney requesting a stay on the eviction and citing this case and another Supreme Court stay order based upon the CDC?s moratorium. They told me if a stay was not granted, they would request a trial and appeal any verdict not in their favor. At the same time, they proposed a settlement to an agreed judgment and writ if we gave tenant until May 31st to move out. The May 31st date was set because that is minimum length they thought it would take to get the Stay issue resolved in the higher courts. Not sure if this settlement offer is common practice for the NW Justice Project, or only on a case-by-case basis. I wonder if others have received the same offer.
My client took the offer to get a set vacate date and avoid the cost of trial and appeal, which would have delayed everything anyway. And we still don?t know whether the CDC moratorium would be extended further, and it?s unclear what the legislature will do in the meantime. Our agreement waives any current or future enacted defenses to eviction.
Sincerely yours,
SCOTT E. RUSSON
Attorney at Law
Yates Marshall, PLLC
10000 N.E. 7th Avenue, Suite 200
Vancouver, WA 98685
Phone: (360) 449-6100
Fax: (360) 449-6111
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information in this email and attachment(s) is legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee listed on this email. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email and attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at the number listed above, reply to this email that it was sent in error, then erase the e-mail and attachment(s) from your computer. Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. This e-mail and all responses to this email may be subject to Public Disclosure. Thank you.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Kaitlyn Jackson
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:42 AM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
Bryce -
Theoretically, if the occupant submits the CDC Declaration, then under the current legal justification, the occupant would be protected.
If you look at the CDC's terribly drafted "Order" you will see it applies to a "landlord, owner of a residential property, or other person with a legal right to pursue eviction or possessory action" and "covered persons" are defined as "tenant, lessee, or resident of a residential property."
The way I read it is that under the broad interpretation being applied, it even applies to a squatter or a trespasser. The CDC's Order does not (to my knowledge) even require the person, be on the property legally.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 11:36 AM Bryce Dille <Bryce at dillelaw.com<mailto:Bryce at dillelaw.com>> wrote:
What about evictions arising out of non landlord tenant situations where PR is attempting to evict a family member from decedents house after 60 day notice to sell was given and we are in action for ejectment.
Bryce H. Dille
Dille Law, PLLC
2010 Caton Way SW Ste. 101
Olympia, WA 98502
Office: 360-350-0270
Cell: 253-579-5561
** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**
This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s). If this matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender immediately.
Business Entity Creation and Management, Business, Government and Tax Law, Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Rob Rowley
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:03 AM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
Subject: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon owner's intent to sell or occupy. Dealing with the federal CDC eviction moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district court. Oral argument on May 13.
https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction hearings.
[cid:image001.jpg at 01D714DC.47CFF290]
Robert R Rowley
Attorney & Counselor at Law
[cid:image002.png at 01D714DC.47CFF290] (509) 252-5074<tel:(509)%20252-5074> [cid:image003.png at 01D714DC.47CFF290] (509) 994-1143<tel:(509)%20994-1143>
[cid:image004.png at 01D714DC.47CFF290] (509) 928-3084 [cid:image005.png at 01D714DC.47CFF290] rowleylegal.com<http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
[cid:image006.png at 01D714DC.47CFF290] rob at rowleylegal.com<mailto:rob at rowleylegal.com>
Helping You Protect What Matters Most
[cid:image007.png at 01D714DC.47CFF290]<https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal> [cid:image008.png at 01D714DC.47CFF290] <https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters in Washington and Idaho.
NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message. Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
--
Thank you,
Kaitlyn R. Jackson | Attorney| DIMENSION LAW GROUP PLLC
130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 | Tukwila, WA 98188
t: 206.973.3500 | f: 206.577.5090| e: kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com|<mailto:kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com|> www.dimensionlaw.com<http://www.dimensionlaw.com/>
Covid-19 Update - Dimension Law Group remains available to serve our clients and the public during this time, subject to the orders and recommendations of government authority.
All attorneys and staff are working remotely regular business hours and are available via email and by phone. Videoconferencing also is available. We will continue to advise and support our clients throughout this health emergency.
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Attempts to intercept this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the interceptor to fines, imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone; return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper and electronic copies. Any settlement offer contained herein is made pursuant to Washington ER 408, and without admitting fault or liability on the part of this firm?s client(s) or its agents. IRS C!
IRCULAR 230 DISCLAIMER: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/ade325f8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/ade325f8/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/ade325f8/image002-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/ade325f8/image003-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/ade325f8/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: image005.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/ade325f8/image005-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: image006.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/ade325f8/image006-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: image007.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/ade325f8/image007-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: image008.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/ade325f8/image008-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 12:19:34 -0800
From: Kaitlyn Jackson <kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v
Drury
Message-ID:
<CAO+NF_7JzbYZ8PfThLRORXJ+zERiZSC7snjchNkkZy1dqfNhuA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Robert -
I have lots of thoughts. I'm sure I'm being naive when I assume the Supreme
Court will be rational in their assessment that the CDC's order does not
apply in Washington because 1. Washington's own eviction Proclamation is
*more* strict than the CDC"s protection (which is one of the stated
exemptions in the CDC Order itself) and/or 2. the CDC's authority does not
extend to private land contracts. It's an interesting debate - but I don't
think the CDC told people they *had *to wear masks, right? Everything they
did with regard to policing people's behavior were recommendations that
local governments could use as evidence to create policy within their
jurisdictions. That is, except for this Order regarding evictions. But it's
certainly been a really hard slog trying to keep up with all the different
municipalities, counties, state, CDC, and Federal Government all acting on
their own with regard to evictions and governing landlord/tenant contracts.
Reminds me of the old adage "too many cooks spoil the soup." So, I can't
claim I know everything the CDC did this last year and how they
accomplished it. If it is determined the CDC had the requisite authority,
it makes me wonder how far they can stretch that moving forward when we
approach new social problems. I've never been one to really fear or
question the stretch of government authority - but the way this CDC order
has been handled has been an eye-opener for me personally and
professionally. In addition to being an attorney I'm also a housing
provider. One of my goals was to provide affordable housing so I could help
people through difficult transitions in their lives. I virtually only
charge my tenant(s) what it costs me to keep the Property. However, the
reality is that the level of risk and lack of control that I have over the
Property that this situation has brought to light has made it clear that I
can't absorb that level of risk. So, like many of my clients, when it's
possible, there's really only one way to reduce that risk - sell out of
Washington which reduces the accessibility of affordable housing
(especially quality housing). Big landlords who develop large apartment
buildings will survive and probably thrive - but people who don't want to
raise their kids in apartment complexes (or in the New York large low-cost
complex model), will rarely have that opportunity.
Off of the soap box - the reality here is that the fact that owners and
housing providers are having to wait until the summer (which will be 14-16
months after the moratorium began) to come to this conclusion is a
miscarriage of justice and it's not equitable because equity requires an
assessment of both sides' circumstances. At least, it is in Washington when
Washington's own laws don't require any proof of COVID-19 impact and don't
consider the situation of the landowner. In one county I appeared in this
week, even when a Defendant files a CDC Declaration, the Commissioner will
not allow Plaintiff's counsel to question the facts declared by the
Defendant to demonstrate the patently false contents of the Declaration.
In another case I am involved in, the tenants have not paid a single dollar
in over a year and live in a 1.4 million dollar house on Lake Washington.
It's hard to say they've "lost their jobs" when they own their own
businesses. In another case the occupant is a subtenant that the landlord
never knew about or agreed to and this person is constantly posting all
over facebook vacationing in elaborate destinations while, once again, not
paying $1 in rent for over a year. A couple of weeks go I was barely able
to save a client from foreclosure due to the inability to remove the
occupants so that the Property could be sold on the open market.
I probably have 30-40 cases I've dealt with over the past year that involve
clear abuse of the protections. And I'm just one attorney in this field. So
if my experience is any indication of the level of abuse out there - it's
rampant and it will be the tax dollars that subsidize it when all this is
over.
In my humble opinion, the government is foisting it's responsibilities to
resolve the housing crisis onto private landowners without any compensation
(let alone "just" compensation). Moreover, there's no balance of the
equities even when the landlord has a really good reason to terminate the
occupancy to (for example) sell the Property. I'm working on several cases
involving elderly individuals needing to sell their rental properties in
order to pay for their own healthcare or to be able to afford housing of
their own. The justification for this is "well, these defendants still owe
the money so it's not technically a taking." I understand housing is a
necessity - but so is food. I think what's going on now is analogous to
requiring private restaurants to allow people to come in and refuse to pay
for their meals because of COVID-19 and also require those restaurants to
continue feeding those individuals day after day while the pandemic is
going on because, well, food is a necessity. Obviously restaurants were
heavily impacted by the Pandemic, but at least they could shut their doors,
sell their business, or close up shop to stop their financial bleeding. Not
the same is true for housing providers.
I've been thinking creatively about other ways to challenge the CDC's
authority in Washington and have been wondering why housing providers can't
simply force a non-paying defendant to file for bankruptcy. Wouldn't a
housing provider be a creditor? What would happen if the housing provider
did force a tenant to file for bankruptcy? Wouldn't the trustee have the
authority whether or not to allow the lease to continue or to terminate it?
Wouldn't that create a jurisdictional showdown between the authority of the
CDC and the Bankruptcy court? Anyone have thoughts on that?
Kaitlyn
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 11:06 AM Rob Rowley <rob at rowleylegal.com> wrote:
> Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling
> which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon
> owner's intent to sell or occupy. Dealing with the federal CDC eviction
> moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district
> court. Oral argument on May 13.
>
>
> https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
>
> I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction
> hearings.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Robert R Rowley*
> Attorney & Counselor at Law
> (509) 252-5074 (509) 994-1143
> (509) 928-3084 rowleylegal.com <http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
> rob at rowleylegal.com
> Helping You Protect What Matters Most
> <https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>
> <https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
>
> *Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters
> in Washington and Idaho. *
>
> NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected
> by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable
> protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this
> message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message.
> Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that
> responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or
> face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal
> inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal
> opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
>
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
> others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
--
Thank you,
Kaitlyn R. Jackson | Attorney| DIMENSION LAW GROUP PLLC
130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 | Tukwila, WA 98188
t: *206.973.3500 *| f: *206.577.5090*| e: *kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com*|
www.dimensionlaw.com
Covid-19 Update - Dimension Law Group remains available to serve our
clients and the public during this time, subject to the orders and
recommendations of government authority.
All attorneys and staff are working remotely regular business hours and are
available via email and by phone. Videoconferencing also is available. We
will continue to advise and support our clients throughout this health
emergency.
--
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:??This e-mail (including any attachments) is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may
contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the
intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Attempts to intercept
this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) of the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the interceptor to fines,
imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone;
return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper
and electronic copies.?Any settlement offer contained herein is made
pursuant to Washington ER 408, and without admitting fault or liability on
the part of this firm?s client(s) or its agents.??IRS?CIRCULAR?230
DISCLAIMER:??To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I
inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication
(including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/f18576a0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image017.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/f18576a0/image017-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image018.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/f18576a0/image018-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image019.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/f18576a0/image019-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image020.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/f18576a0/image020-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image021.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/f18576a0/image021-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image022.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/f18576a0/image022-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image023.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/f18576a0/image023-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image024.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/f18576a0/image024-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 23:27:45 +0000
From: "Gregory L. Ursich" <gursich at insleebest.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] lfp problem
Message-ID:
<MWHPR17MB15011C893E946A49391D510CDC929 at MWHPR17MB1501.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Roger: I have dealt with these type of cases before, but not specifically involving Lake Forest Park. I also live in Shoreline, close to LFP. Happy to talk to the client. -Greg
[cid:image001.jpg at 01D714F8.963C0600]
Gregory L. Ursich
Shareholder
Skyline Tower, Suite 1500 | 10900 NE 4th Street | Bellevue, WA 98004
P: 425.450.4258 | F: 425.635.7720
vCard<http://www.insleebest.com/uploads/vcards/gursich.vcf> | website<http://www.insleebest.com/> | gursich at insleebest.com<mailto:gursich at insleebest.com>
This electronic mail transmission is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Roger Hawkes
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2021 10:51 AM
To: Real Property Listserve <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] lfp problem
I am looking to refer a good client to a lawyer who has dealt with Lake Forest Park before and knows about respective rights and obligations between landowner and government. It appears that my client's home is threatened by erosion created by faulty construction of a sewer on her property , by the city.
Roger Hawkes, WSBA # 5173 [cid:image006.jpg at 01D714F8.963C0600]
Shoreline Office: 19944 Ballinger Way NE
Shoreline, WA 98155
Sultan Office: 423 Main
Sultan, WA 98294
Phone: 206 367 5000; fax: 206 367 4005
Email: roger at law-hawks.com<mailto:roger at law-hawks.com>
Web site: www.hawkeslawfirm.com<http://www.hawkeslawfirm.com/>
.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/8807e0c1/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5282 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/8807e0c1/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4576 bytes
Desc: image006.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/8807e0c1/image006-0001.jpg>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:25:46 -0800
From: "Samuel M. Meyler" <samuel at meylerlegal.com>
To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
Message-ID:
<!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAACbHoCsc1ItKmJ4fEYgZbykBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAAAan1CQxuu4T7Rv+BIVEbPMAQAAAAA=@meylerlegal.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Listmates,
WAC 458-61A-214 provides an excise tax exemption for the subsequent transfer
of property by a "nominee" to a third-party (the intended buyer). My
understanding is that FlyHomes uses this exemption to purchase properties
for cash on behalf of its clients and subsequently sell the property to the
client, without having to pay excise tax on the subsequent transfer.
For those who are unfamiliar, FlyHomes is a real estate firm with a lending
arm that allows its buyer-clients to present an "all cash offer" by
purchasing the home for the client for all cash and then selling it to the
client, allowing the client to essentially present an extremely competitive,
all-cash offer. This is not a promo for FlyHome's services. I just find it
to be an interesting model and I am researching it.
Is anyone familiar with this type of transaction and how to document it? I
know that the WAC provides examples and "explains" what documentation is
necessary, but I am wondering if someone may have actually prepared
materials documenting a transaction involving a nominee that have been
accepted when recording and if you would be able to share those materials
for review. TIA
Sam
Samuel M. Meyler
Meyler Legal, PLLC
1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
Seattle, Washington 98109
Tel: 206.876.7770
Fax: 206.876.7771
Email: <mailto:samuel at meylerlegal.com> samuel at meylerlegal.com
NOTICE:
This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or
Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is
intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the
sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c89b2496/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 17:44:30 -0700
From: <michael at westseattleattorney.com>
To: "WSBA Real Property Listserv" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
Message-ID:
<20210309174430.c4dc0bb2a322ec24c6317f4bf97284a6.71597b1ef8.wbe at email21.godaddy.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/74fea3d7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sigimg0
Type: image/png
Size: 51981 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/74fea3d7/sigimg0-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:51:24 +0000
From: "marc holmeslawgroup.com" <marc at holmeslawgroup.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
Message-ID:
<BYAPR15MB2199443F11B34BC9D816F006BD919 at BYAPR15MB2199.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I am familiar with FlyHomes and have been very impressed with how far they've come since I first met the founders when they were just getting started.
You can probably find a home they've sold in King County on their website and then search the county recorder's website for the excise affidavits filed in that transaction.
Marc Holmes, JD
Holmes Law Group PLLC
2303 W. Commodore Way, Suite 306
Seattle, WA 98199
marc at holmeslawgroup.com<mailto:marc at holmeslawgroup.com>
(206) 357-4224 (ofc)
(206) 849-0853 (cell)
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Samuel M. Meyler
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 6:26 PM
To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
Listmates,
WAC 458-61A-214 provides an excise tax exemption for the subsequent transfer of property by a "nominee" to a third-party (the intended buyer). My understanding is that FlyHomes uses this exemption to purchase properties for cash on behalf of its clients and subsequently sell the property to the client, without having to pay excise tax on the subsequent transfer.
For those who are unfamiliar, FlyHomes is a real estate firm with a lending arm that allows its buyer-clients to present an "all cash offer" by purchasing the home for the client for all cash and then selling it to the client, allowing the client to essentially present an extremely competitive, all-cash offer. This is not a promo for FlyHome's services... I just find it to be an interesting model and I am researching it.
Is anyone familiar with this type of transaction and how to document it? I know that the WAC provides examples and "explains" what documentation is necessary, but I am wondering if someone may have actually prepared materials documenting a transaction involving a nominee that have been accepted when recording and if you would be able to share those materials for review. TIA
Sam
Samuel M. Meyler
Meyler Legal, PLLC
1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
Seattle, Washington 98109
Tel: 206.876.7770
Fax: 206.876.7771
Email: samuel at meylerlegal.com<mailto:samuel at meylerlegal.com>
NOTICE:
This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210310/9a10e973/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:05:32 -0800
From: "Samuel M. Meyler" <samuel at meylerlegal.com>
To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
Message-ID:
<!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAACbHoCsc1ItKmJ4fEYgZbykBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABMUHarR4NFQIJRQWOQ9gi8AQAAAAA=@meylerlegal.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks, Marc. Yes, I have done that and seen what they attach to their
REETAs. I am looking for some other examples as well.
They have definitely come a long way in a short period of time. They have a
good amount of investment to back them up. It's a very interesting model.
Samuel M. Meyler
Meyler Legal, PLLC
1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
Seattle, Washington 98109
Tel: 206.876.7770
Fax: 206.876.7771
Email: <mailto:samuel at meylerlegal.com> samuel at meylerlegal.com
NOTICE:
This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or
Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is
intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the
sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments.
Thank you.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
On Behalf Of marc holmeslawgroup.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 4:51 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
I am familiar with FlyHomes and have been very impressed with how far
they've come since I first met the founders when they were just getting
started.
You can probably find a home they've sold in King County on their website
and then search the county recorder's website for the excise affidavits
filed in that transaction.
Marc Holmes, JD
Holmes Law Group PLLC
2303 W. Commodore Way, Suite 306
Seattle, WA 98199
<mailto:marc at holmeslawgroup.com> marc at holmeslawgroup.com
(206) 357-4224 (ofc)
(206) 849-0853 (cell)
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
<wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> > On Behalf Of Samuel M. Meyler
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 6:26 PM
To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
Listmates,
WAC 458-61A-214 provides an excise tax exemption for the subsequent transfer
of property by a "nominee" to a third-party (the intended buyer). My
understanding is that FlyHomes uses this exemption to purchase properties
for cash on behalf of its clients and subsequently sell the property to the
client, without having to pay excise tax on the subsequent transfer.
For those who are unfamiliar, FlyHomes is a real estate firm with a lending
arm that allows its buyer-clients to present an "all cash offer" by
purchasing the home for the client for all cash and then selling it to the
client, allowing the client to essentially present an extremely competitive,
all-cash offer. This is not a promo for FlyHome's services. I just find it
to be an interesting model and I am researching it.
Is anyone familiar with this type of transaction and how to document it? I
know that the WAC provides examples and "explains" what documentation is
necessary, but I am wondering if someone may have actually prepared
materials documenting a transaction involving a nominee that have been
accepted when recording and if you would be able to share those materials
for review. TIA
Sam
Samuel M. Meyler
Meyler Legal, PLLC
1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
Seattle, Washington 98109
Tel: 206.876.7770
Fax: 206.876.7771
Email: <mailto:samuel at meylerlegal.com> samuel at meylerlegal.com
NOTICE:
This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or
Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is
intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the
sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/06e5964c/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:44:26 -0800
From: "Robert R. Cole" <cole-gilday at stanwoodlaw.net>
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
Message-ID: <cc47ea15-d49f-d466-becd-8274afcff6ef at stanwoodlaw.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"
Just because the treasurer allows it doesn't mean it works.? I had one
that DOR notified us 2 years later that they had problems.? Have to do
all the details.
Very Truly Yours,
Robert R. Cole
Law Office of Cole & Gilday, P.C.
10101 - 270th St. NW
Stanwood, WA 98292
(360) 629-2900 (Telephone)
(360) 629-0220 (Fax)
This message contains confidential and privileged information that is
intended only for the named recipient(s).Unless you are the named
recipient or authorized agent thereof, you are prohibited from reading,
copying, distributing or otherwise disseminating such information.If you
receive this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately.
On 3/9/2021 5:05 PM, Samuel M. Meyler wrote:
>
> Thanks, Marc.? Yes, I have done that and seen what they attach to
> their REETAs.? I am looking for some other examples as well.
>
> They have definitely come a long way in a short period of time.? They
> have a good amount of investment to back them up.? It?s a very
> interesting model.
>
> **
>
> *Samuel M. Meyler*
>
> *Meyler Legal, PLLC *
>
> 1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
>
> Seattle, Washington 98109
>
> *Tel:*206.876.7770
>
> *Fax:*206.876.7771
>
> *Email:*samuel at meylerlegal.com <mailto:samuel at meylerlegal.com>
>
> *NOTICE:*
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential
> or Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the
> meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The
> information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity
> named above.? If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
> this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in
> error, please notify the sender and delete the copy you received
> together with any attachments.? Thank you.
>
> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> *On Behalf Of *marc holmeslawgroup.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 9, 2021 4:51 PM
> *To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
>
> I am familiar with FlyHomes and have been very impressed with how far
> they?ve come since I first met the founders when they were just
> getting started.
>
> You can probably find a home they?ve sold in King County on their
> website and then search the county recorder?s website for the excise
> affidavits filed in that transaction.
>
> Marc Holmes, JD
> Holmes Law Group PLLC
>
> 2303 W. Commodore Way, Suite 306
>
> Seattle, WA 98199
> marc at holmeslawgroup.com <mailto:marc at holmeslawgroup.com>
> (206) 357-4224?(ofc)
> (206) 849-0853?(cell)
>
> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
> <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
> <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> *On Behalf Of *Samuel M.
> Meyler
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 9, 2021 6:26 PM
> *To:* 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
> <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
> *Subject:* [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
>
> Listmates,
>
> WAC 458-61A-214 provides an excise tax exemption for the subsequent
> transfer of property by a ?nominee? to a third-party (the intended
> buyer).? My understanding is that FlyHomes uses this exemption to
> purchase properties for cash on behalf of its clients and subsequently
> sell the property to the client, without having to pay excise tax on
> the subsequent transfer.
>
> For those who are unfamiliar, FlyHomes is a real estate firm with a
> lending arm that allows its buyer-clients to present an ?all cash
> offer? by purchasing the home for the client for all cash and then
> selling it to the client, allowing the client to essentially present
> an extremely competitive, all-cash offer.? This is not a promo for
> FlyHome?s services? I just find it to be an interesting model and I am
> researching it.
>
> Is anyone familiar with this type of transaction and how to document
> it?? I know that the WAC provides examples and ?explains? what
> documentation is necessary, but I am wondering if someone may have
> actually prepared materials documenting a transaction involving a
> nominee that have been accepted when recording and if you would be
> able to share those materials for review.? TIA
>
> Sam
>
> **
>
> *Samuel M. Meyler*
>
> *Meyler Legal, PLLC *
>
> 1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
>
> Seattle, Washington 98109
>
> *Tel:*206.876.7770
>
> *Fax:*206.876.7771
>
> *Email:*samuel at meylerlegal.com <mailto:samuel at meylerlegal.com>
>
> *NOTICE:*
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential
> or Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the
> meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The
> information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity
> named above.? If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
> this information is prohibited.? If you received this transmission in
> error, please notify the sender and delete the copy you received
> together with any attachments.? Thank you.
>
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/be179df3/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 18:20:30 -0800
From: "Samuel M. Meyler" <samuel at meylerlegal.com>
To: <cole-gilday at stanwoodlaw.net>, "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'"
<wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
Message-ID:
<!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAACbHoCsc1ItKmJ4fEYgZbykBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAAAm4tRX0tnJQImbC5RFZxceAQAAAAA=@meylerlegal.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Robert,
Yes, that's a concern and why I am asking for examples of transaction docs
that other have used.
Does the issue with DOR that you are dealing with relate to the use of a
nominee to purchase property and the exemption under WAC 458-61A-214? It
would be good to know what issues DOR has with such transactions.
Sam
Samuel M. Meyler
Meyler Legal, PLLC
1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
Seattle, Washington 98109
Tel: 206.876.7770
Fax: 206.876.7771
Email: <mailto:samuel at meylerlegal.com> samuel at meylerlegal.com
NOTICE:
This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or
Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is
intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the
sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments.
Thank you.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
On Behalf Of Robert R. Cole
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 5:44 PM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
Just because the treasurer allows it doesn't mean it works. I had one that
DOR notified us 2 years later that they had problems. Have to do all the
details.
Very Truly Yours,
Robert R. Cole
Law Office of Cole & Gilday, P.C.
10101 - 270th St. NW
Stanwood, WA 98292
(360) 629-2900 (Telephone)
(360) 629-0220 (Fax)
This message contains confidential and privileged information that is
intended only for the named recipient(s). Unless you are the named
recipient or authorized agent thereof, you are prohibited from reading,
copying, distributing or otherwise disseminating such information. If you
receive this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately.
On 3/9/2021 5:05 PM, Samuel M. Meyler wrote:
Thanks, Marc. Yes, I have done that and seen what they attach to their
REETAs. I am looking for some other examples as well.
They have definitely come a long way in a short period of time. They have a
good amount of investment to back them up. It's a very interesting model.
Samuel M. Meyler
Meyler Legal, PLLC
1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
Seattle, Washington 98109
Tel: 206.876.7770
Fax: 206.876.7771
Email: <mailto:samuel at meylerlegal.com> samuel at meylerlegal.com
NOTICE:
This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or
Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is
intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the
sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments.
Thank you.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
<wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of marc holmeslawgroup.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 4:51 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
<wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
I am familiar with FlyHomes and have been very impressed with how far
they've come since I first met the founders when they were just getting
started.
You can probably find a home they've sold in King County on their website
and then search the county recorder's website for the excise affidavits
filed in that transaction.
Marc Holmes, JD
Holmes Law Group PLLC
2303 W. Commodore Way, Suite 306
Seattle, WA 98199
<mailto:marc at holmeslawgroup.com> marc at holmeslawgroup.com
(206) 357-4224 (ofc)
(206) 849-0853 (cell)
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
<wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> > On Behalf Of Samuel M. Meyler
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 6:26 PM
To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
Listmates,
WAC 458-61A-214 provides an excise tax exemption for the subsequent transfer
of property by a "nominee" to a third-party (the intended buyer). My
understanding is that FlyHomes uses this exemption to purchase properties
for cash on behalf of its clients and subsequently sell the property to the
client, without having to pay excise tax on the subsequent transfer.
For those who are unfamiliar, FlyHomes is a real estate firm with a lending
arm that allows its buyer-clients to present an "all cash offer" by
purchasing the home for the client for all cash and then selling it to the
client, allowing the client to essentially present an extremely competitive,
all-cash offer. This is not a promo for FlyHome's services. I just find it
to be an interesting model and I am researching it.
Is anyone familiar with this type of transaction and how to document it? I
know that the WAC provides examples and "explains" what documentation is
necessary, but I am wondering if someone may have actually prepared
materials documenting a transaction involving a nominee that have been
accepted when recording and if you would be able to share those materials
for review. TIA
Sam
Samuel M. Meyler
Meyler Legal, PLLC
1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
Seattle, Washington 98109
Tel: 206.876.7770
Fax: 206.876.7771
Email: <mailto:samuel at meylerlegal.com> samuel at meylerlegal.com
NOTICE:
This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or
Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is
intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you
are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the
sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments.
Thank you.
***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys,
law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/54becf4c/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 22:04:04 -0500
From: Scott Osborne <scott.osborne2 at gmail.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
Message-ID: <8949BA0F-061A-4A57-85E1-275686AAA78A at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Does the ultimate owner receive a title policy insuring against the potential excise tax?
Scott Osborne
scott.osborne2 at gmail.com
scott.osborne at foster.com
206 447-6293 - Direct Line
206 359-5454 Cell
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 9, 2021, at 9:24 PM, Samuel M. Meyler <samuel at meylerlegal.com> wrote:
>
> ?
> Robert,
>
> Yes, that?s a concern and why I am asking for examples of transaction docs that other have used.
>
> Does the issue with DOR that you are dealing with relate to the use of a nominee to purchase property and the exemption under WAC 458-61A-214? It would be good to know what issues DOR has with such transactions.
>
> Sam
>
>
> Samuel M. Meyler
> Meyler Legal, PLLC
> 1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
> Seattle, Washington 98109
> Tel: 206.876.7770
> Fax: 206.876.7771
> Email: samuel at meylerlegal.com
>
> NOTICE:
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments. Thank you.
>
> From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Robert R. Cole
> Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 5:44 PM
> To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
> Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
>
> Just because the treasurer allows it doesn't mean it works. I had one that DOR notified us 2 years later that they had problems. Have to do all the details.
>
>
> Very Truly Yours,
> Robert R. Cole
> Law Office of Cole & Gilday, P.C.
>
> 10101 - 270th St. NW
> Stanwood, WA 98292
> (360) 629-2900 (Telephone)
> (360) 629-0220 (Fax)
>
> This message contains confidential and privileged information that is intended only for the named recipient(s). Unless you are the named recipient or authorized agent thereof, you are prohibited from reading, copying, distributing or otherwise disseminating such information. If you receive this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately.
>
> On 3/9/2021 5:05 PM, Samuel M. Meyler wrote:
> Thanks, Marc. Yes, I have done that and seen what they attach to their REETAs. I am looking for some other examples as well.
>
> They have definitely come a long way in a short period of time. They have a good amount of investment to back them up. It?s a very interesting model.
>
>
> Samuel M. Meyler
> Meyler Legal, PLLC
> 1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
> Seattle, Washington 98109
> Tel: 206.876.7770
> Fax: 206.876.7771
> Email: samuel at meylerlegal.com
>
> NOTICE:
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments. Thank you.
>
> From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of marc holmeslawgroup.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 4:51 PM
> To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
>
> I am familiar with FlyHomes and have been very impressed with how far they?ve come since I first met the founders when they were just getting started.
>
> You can probably find a home they?ve sold in King County on their website and then search the county recorder?s website for the excise affidavits filed in that transaction.
>
>
>
> Marc Holmes, JD
> Holmes Law Group PLLC
> 2303 W. Commodore Way, Suite 306
> Seattle, WA 98199
> marc at holmeslawgroup.com
> (206) 357-4224 (ofc)
> (206) 849-0853 (cell)
>
> From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Samuel M. Meyler
> Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 6:26 PM
> To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: [WSBARP] Nominees; WAC 458-61A-214; Flyhomes
>
> Listmates,
>
> WAC 458-61A-214 provides an excise tax exemption for the subsequent transfer of property by a ?nominee? to a third-party (the intended buyer). My understanding is that FlyHomes uses this exemption to purchase properties for cash on behalf of its clients and subsequently sell the property to the client, without having to pay excise tax on the subsequent transfer.
>
> For those who are unfamiliar, FlyHomes is a real estate firm with a lending arm that allows its buyer-clients to present an ?all cash offer? by purchasing the home for the client for all cash and then selling it to the client, allowing the client to essentially present an extremely competitive, all-cash offer. This is not a promo for FlyHome?s services? I just find it to be an interesting model and I am researching it.
>
> Is anyone familiar with this type of transaction and how to document it? I know that the WAC provides examples and ?explains? what documentation is necessary, but I am wondering if someone may have actually prepared materials documenting a transaction involving a nominee that have been accepted when recording and if you would be able to share those materials for review. TIA
>
> Sam
>
>
>
> Samuel M. Meyler
> Meyler Legal, PLLC
> 1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
> Seattle, Washington 98109
> Tel: 206.876.7770
> Fax: 206.876.7771
> Email: samuel at meylerlegal.com
>
> NOTICE:
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments. Thank you.
>
>
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/682a612b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 03:48:12 +0000 (UTC)
From: Stephen Whitehouse <swhite8893 at aol.com>
To: "wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com"
<wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com>, "wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com"
<wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] WSBARP Digest, Vol 78, Issue 6
Message-ID: <1534247728.2034431.1615348092421 at mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Jeff,? ? ? Your facts are not fully clear. Is the trail in the easement? Are there any restrictions on the short plats? Is the easement exclusive?? ? ? So let me hazard a guess that the trail is over the easement and is solely over the property on the right, ?there are no restrictions and it is not exclusive. As a general rule, the owner on?the right can allow other people to use the easement area, but only the part on his/her lot and the other people cannot restrict it unless it is interfering with the use of the easement rights?by the other easement holders, or is creating a nuisance.?? ? ? Where does the easement go to? Who controls the property at the end of the easement? That may be an issue as well.
Steve? ? ??
Stephen WhitehouseWhitehouse & Nichols, LLPP.O. Box 1273601 W. Railroad Ave.Shelton, Wa. 98584360-426-5885
swhite8893 at aol.com
-----Original Message-----
From: wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Sent: Tue, Mar 9, 2021 12:00 pm
Subject: WSBARP Digest, Vol 78, Issue 6
Send WSBARP mailing list submissions to
??? wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
??? http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
??? wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
??? wsbarp-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of WSBARP digest..."
Today's Topics:
? 1. HOA dues foreclosure under covid (Craig Gourley)
? 2. Adjoining Short Plat Lot Owner Opens Walking Trail and??? allows
? ? ? Public Use (Jeff at bellanddavispllc.com)
? 3. lfp problem (Roger Hawkes)
? 4. Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury (Rob Rowley)
? 5. Re: Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
? ? ? (Tom Westbrook)
? 6. Re: Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
? ? ? (Bryce Dille)
? 7. Re: Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
? ? ? (Tom Westbrook)
? 8. Re: Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
? ? ? (Kaitlyn Jackson)
? 9. Re: Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
? ? ? (Kaitlyn Jackson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 13:50:38 +0000
From: Craig Gourley <craig at glgmail.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] HOA dues foreclosure under covid
Message-ID:
??? <MW3PR12MB43468D436EBF8CA63620B43DAE929 at MW3PR12MB4346.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Listmates. Has anyone had experience with Condo dues foreclosure under covid? I don't recall it being addressed in any moratorium but am wondering about real world enforcement by the courts. Thanks to all.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/a2fb96b6/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:39:02 -0800
From: <Jeff at bellanddavispllc.com>
To: <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Adjoining Short Plat Lot Owner Opens Walking Trail
??? and??? allows Public Use
Message-ID: <00f201d71513$7aed6860$70c83920$@bellanddavispllc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Listmates,
Two separate, but adjoining short plats share a common ingress/egress
easement.? An owner, in the? "short plat on the right" opened a walking
trail through his lot and allows the general public to use it.? This allows
people from outside the two short plats to go through lots and resulted in
increased litter and pet problems.? Questions are: 1)? can the other lots
owners require the one to block access through his property, or 2) can other
lot owners block non-easement holders access through their properties?? I
think the answer is yes, at least to #2, but in today's uncertain world, I
would like your opinions.
Jeff Davis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/52553b9c/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 18:50:53 +0000
From: Roger Hawkes <Roger at law-hawks.com>
To: Real Property Listserve <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] lfp problem
Message-ID:
??? <MN2PR16MB2750E525EBF72A5EF5CC6627E9929 at MN2PR16MB2750.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I am looking to refer a good client to a lawyer who has dealt with Lake Forest Park before and knows about respective rights and obligations between landowner and government.? It appears that my client's home is threatened by erosion created by faulty construction of a sewer on her property , by the city.
Roger Hawkes, WSBA # 5173? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? [cid:image001.jpg at 01D714D2.135145A0]
Shoreline Office: 19944 Ballinger Way NE
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Shoreline, WA 98155
Sultan Office:? ? ? ? 423 Main
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Sultan, WA 98294
Phone: 206 367 5000; fax: 206 367 4005
Email: roger at law-hawks.com<mailto:roger at law-hawks.com>
Web site: www.hawkeslawfirm.com<http://www.hawkeslawfirm.com/>
.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/0056b7e7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6963 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/0056b7e7/image001-0001.jpg>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:03:01 -0800
From: Rob Rowley <rob at rowleylegal.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
Message-ID: <23e9565525bef269332c28dbddcbdb2b at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling
which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon
owner's intent to sell or occupy.? Dealing with the federal CDC eviction
moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district
court.? Oral argument on May 13.
https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction
hearings.
*Robert R Rowley*
Attorney & Counselor at Law
(509) 252-5074? (509) 994-1143
(509) 928-3084 <fax:(509)%20928-3084>? rowleylegal.com
<http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
rob at rowleylegal.com
Helping You Protect What Matters Most
<https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>
<https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
*Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters
in Washington and Idaho. *
NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected
by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable
protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this
message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message.
Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that
responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or
face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal
inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal
opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image017.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image017-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image018.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image018-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image019.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image019-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image020.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image020-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image021.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image021-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image022.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image022-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image023.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image023-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image024.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image024-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:14:10 -0800
From: Tom Westbrook <tjw at w3net.net>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v
??? Drury
Message-ID: <6723db35fef3107f7d249651d238309e at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Yes???Ugh!
Sincerely,
Tom
Thomas J. Westbrook
Attorney at Law
Rodgers Kee Card & Strophy, P.S.
324 West Bay Drive NW, Suite 201
Olympia, Washington? 98502
Phone: 360-352-8311
Facsimile: 360-352-8501
Email: tjw at buddbaylaw.com
Skype: thomas.westbrook
www.buddbaylaw.com
The information contained in this email and attachment(s) are for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain private, privileged
and/or confidential information.? If you are not the addressee, you are
strictly prohibited from reading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise
using this email or its contents in any way. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at
360-352-8311 or by e-mail to reception at buddbaylaw.com, and destroy the
original message from your electronic files.
COVID-19 UPDATE:
s Rodgers Kee Card & Strophy will no longer maintain ?open? hours at the
physical office.
s All the staff is working remotely.? We are routinely monitoring our voice
mail and email, which is the best way to communicate during this period.
s We are still taking new clients but consultations will be telephonic or
via video conferencing, and any in-person meetings will be by appointment
and only if necessary to execute documents.
s Please provide necessary documents to us by scan and email, where
possible, or by mail if not.
s We anticipate these changes will be effective for the foreseeable
future.? We are doing everything we can to maintain the level of service
and professionalism we?ve always provided, even in the face of this public
health crisis. Thank you in advance for your patience and understanding.
We look forward to the soonest possible return to full operations and
continued service to our clients.
*From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
*On Behalf Of *Rob Rowley
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 09, 2021 11:03 AM
*To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
*Subject:* [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling
which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon
owner's intent to sell or occupy.? Dealing with the federal CDC eviction
moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district
court.? Oral argument on May 13.
https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction
hearings.
*Robert R Rowley*
Attorney & Counselor at Law
(509) 252-5074? (509) 994-1143
(509) 928-3084 <fax:(509)%20928-3084>? rowleylegal.com
<http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
rob at rowleylegal.com
Helping You Protect What Matters Most
<https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>
<https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
*Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters
in Washington and Idaho. *
NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected
by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable
protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this
message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message.
Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that
responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or
face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal
inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal
opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 15390 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image002-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image003-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image005-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image006-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image007-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image008-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image009-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 19:33:23 +0000
From: Bryce Dille <Bryce at dillelaw.com>
To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v
??? Drury
Message-ID:
??? <MW3PR11MB45883E6BBE53B7B9C5C45C23C8929 at MW3PR11MB4588.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
What about evictions arising out of non landlord tenant situations where PR is attempting to evict a family member from decedents house after 60 day notice to sell was given and we are in action for ejectment.
Bryce H. Dille
Dille Law, PLLC
2010 Caton Way SW Ste. 101
Olympia, WA 98502
Office: 360-350-0270
Cell: 253-579-5561
** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**
This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s).? If this matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender immediately.
Business Entity Creation and Management, Business, Government and Tax Law, Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Rob Rowley
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:03 AM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon owner's intent to sell or occupy.? Dealing with the federal CDC eviction moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district court.? Oral argument on May 13.
https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction hearings.
[cid:image001.jpg at 01D714D8.0334EA90]
Robert R Rowley
Attorney & Counselor at Law
[cid:image002.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90] (509) 252-5074<tel:(509)%20252-5074>? [cid:image003.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90]? (509) 994-1143<tel:(509)%20994-1143>
[cid:image004.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90] (509) 928-3084<fax:(509)%20928-3084>? [cid:image005.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90]? rowleylegal.com<http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
[cid:image006.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90] rob at rowleylegal.com<mailto:rob at rowleylegal.com>
Helping You Protect What Matters Most
[cid:image007.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90]<https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>? [cid:image008.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90] <https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters in Washington and Idaho.
NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message. Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image002-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image003-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: image005.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image005-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: image006.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image006-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: image007.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image007-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: image008.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image008-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:38:28 -0800
From: Tom Westbrook <tjw at w3net.net>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v
??? Drury
Message-ID: <61e0a6ce1e323385eb9ee9f00cd94de9 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Bryce, I have the same concern time 3 in various stages of the 60 day
period. I guess the question is, how will our Superior Court Judges react
to this?
Sincerely,
Tom
Thomas J. Westbrook
Attorney at Law
Rodgers Kee Card & Strophy, P.S.
324 West Bay Drive NW, Suite 201
Olympia, Washington? 98502
Phone: 360-352-8311
Facsimile: 360-352-8501
Email: tjw at buddbaylaw.com
Skype: thomas.westbrook
www.buddbaylaw.com
The information contained in this email and attachment(s) are for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain private, privileged
and/or confidential information.? If you are not the addressee, you are
strictly prohibited from reading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise
using this email or its contents in any way. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at
360-352-8311 or by e-mail to reception at buddbaylaw.com, and destroy the
original message from your electronic files.
COVID-19 UPDATE:
s Rodgers Kee Card & Strophy will no longer maintain ?open? hours at the
physical office.
s All the staff is working remotely.? We are routinely monitoring our voice
mail and email, which is the best way to communicate during this period.
s We are still taking new clients but consultations will be telephonic or
via video conferencing, and any in-person meetings will be by appointment
and only if necessary to execute documents.
s Please provide necessary documents to us by scan and email, where
possible, or by mail if not.
s We anticipate these changes will be effective for the foreseeable
future.? We are doing everything we can to maintain the level of service
and professionalism we?ve always provided, even in the face of this public
health crisis. Thank you in advance for your patience and understanding.
We look forward to the soonest possible return to full operations and
continued service to our clients.
*From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
*On Behalf Of *Bryce Dille
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 09, 2021 11:33 AM
*To:* 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
*Subject:* Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
What about evictions arising out of non landlord tenant situations where PR
is attempting to evict a family member from decedents house after 60 day
notice to sell was given and we are in action for ejectment.
Bryce H. Dille
Dille Law, PLLC
2010 Caton Way SW Ste. 101
Olympia, WA 98502
Office: 360-350-0270
Cell: 253-579-5561
** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that
sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**
This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and
may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s).? If this
matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender
immediately.
Business Entity Creation and Management, Business, Government and Tax Law,
Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium
Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including
Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate
Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration
Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments
Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures.
*From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
*On Behalf Of *Rob Rowley
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:03 AM
*To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
*Subject:* [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling
which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon
owner's intent to sell or occupy.? Dealing with the federal CDC eviction
moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district
court.? Oral argument on May 13.
https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction
hearings.
*Robert R Rowley*
Attorney & Counselor at Law
(509) 252-5074? (509) 994-1143
(509) 928-3084 <fax:(509)%20928-3084>? rowleylegal.com
<http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
rob at rowleylegal.com
Helping You Protect What Matters Most
<https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>
<https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
*Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters
in Washington and Idaho. *
NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected
by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable
protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this
message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message.
Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that
responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or
face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal
inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal
opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 15390 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image009-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image010.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image010-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image011.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image011-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image012.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image012-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image013.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image013-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image014.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image014-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image015.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image015-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image016.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image016-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image017.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image017-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:41:47 -0800
From: Kaitlyn Jackson <kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v
??? Drury
Message-ID:
??? <CAO+NF_464x2QFfkwAuUJkO0YLS8Sdn9D+b6sW=mC4j-ZjTV6sw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Bryce -
Theoretically, if the occupant submits the CDC Declaration, then under the
current legal justification, the occupant would be protected.
If you look at the CDC's terribly drafted "Order" you will see it applies
to a "landlord, owner of a residential property, or other person with a
legal right to pursue eviction or possessory action" and? "covered persons"
are defined as "tenant, lessee, or resident of a residential property."
The way I read it is that under the broad interpretation being applied, it
even applies to a squatter or a trespasser. The CDC's Order does not (to my
knowledge) even require the person, be on the property legally.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 11:36 AM Bryce Dille <Bryce at dillelaw.com> wrote:
> What about evictions arising out of non landlord tenant situations where
> PR is attempting to evict a family member from decedents house after 60 day
> notice to sell was given and we are in action for ejectment.
>
>
>
> Bryce H. Dille
>
> Dille Law, PLLC
>
> 2010 Caton Way SW Ste. 101
>
> Olympia, WA 98502
>
> Office: 360-350-0270
>
> Cell: 253-579-5561
>
>
>
> ** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that
> sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**
>
>
>
> This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and
> may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s).? If this
> matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender
> immediately.
>
>
>
> Business Entity Creation and Management, Business, Government and Tax Law,
> Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium
> Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including
> Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate
> Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration
> Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments
> Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures.
>
>
>
> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <
> wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> *On Behalf Of *Rob Rowley
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:03 AM
> *To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> *Subject:* [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
>
>
>
> Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling
> which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon
> owner's intent to sell or occupy.? Dealing with the federal CDC eviction
> moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district
> court.? Oral argument on May 13.
>
>
> https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
>
> I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction
> hearings.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Robert R Rowley*
> Attorney & Counselor at Law
>? (509) 252-5074 <(509)%20252-5074>? (509) 994-1143 <(509)%20994-1143>
>? (509) 928-3084? rowleylegal.com <http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
>? rob at rowleylegal.com
> Helping You Protect What Matters Most
> <https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>
> <https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
>
> *Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters
> in Washington and Idaho. *
>
> NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected
> by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable
> protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this
> message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message.
> Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that
> responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or
> face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal
> inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal
> opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
>
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
> others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
--
Thank you,
Kaitlyn R. Jackson | Attorney| DIMENSION LAW GROUP PLLC
130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 | Tukwila, WA 98188
t: *206.973.3500 *| f: *206.577.5090*| e: *kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com*|
www.dimensionlaw.com
Covid-19 Update - Dimension Law Group remains available to serve our
clients and the public during this time, subject to the orders and
recommendations of government authority.
All attorneys and staff are working remotely regular business hours and are
available via email and by phone. Videoconferencing also is available. We
will continue to advise and support our clients throughout this health
emergency.
--
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:??This e-mail (including any attachments) is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may
contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the
intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Attempts to intercept
this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) of the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the interceptor to fines,
imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone;
return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper
and electronic copies.?Any settlement offer contained herein is made
pursuant to Washington ER 408, and without admitting fault or liability on
the part of this firm?s client(s) or its agents.??IRS?CIRCULAR?230
DISCLAIMER:??To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I
inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication
(including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image002-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image003-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image005-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image006-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image007-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image008-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:48:19 -0800
From: Kaitlyn Jackson <kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v
??? Drury
Message-ID:
??? <CAO+NF_77m2aYtTxK+v0eZfHa_8qbmFcJxgirjBQzajVu-cjc3w at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Bryce -
Let me correct. In the Order, they further define "Residential Property" as
"property leased for residential purposes...". So, you might be able to
argue the CDC Order does not apply. However, if there's any evidence that
the occupant *paid *for anything that could be construed to create an
implied contract to rent, then the CDC could be argued to apply.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 11:41 AM Kaitlyn Jackson <kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com>
wrote:
> Bryce -
>
> Theoretically, if the occupant submits the CDC Declaration, then under the
> current legal justification, the occupant would be protected.
>
> If you look at the CDC's terribly drafted "Order" you will see it applies
> to a "landlord, owner of a residential property, or other person with a
> legal right to pursue eviction or possessory action" and? "covered persons"
> are defined as "tenant, lessee, or resident of a residential property."
>
> The way I read it is that under the broad interpretation being applied, it
> even applies to a squatter or a trespasser. The CDC's Order does not (to my
> knowledge) even require the person, be on the property legally.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 11:36 AM Bryce Dille <Bryce at dillelaw.com> wrote:
>
>> What about evictions arising out of non landlord tenant situations where
>> PR is attempting to evict a family member from decedents house after 60 day
>> notice to sell was given and we are in action for ejectment.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bryce H. Dille
>>
>> Dille Law, PLLC
>>
>> 2010 Caton Way SW Ste. 101
>>
>> Olympia, WA 98502
>>
>> Office: 360-350-0270
>>
>> Cell: 253-579-5561
>>
>>
>>
>> ** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that
>> sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**
>>
>>
>>
>> This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications
>> and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s).? If
>> this matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender
>> immediately.
>>
>>
>>
>> Business Entity Creation and Management, Business, Government and Tax
>> Law, Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium
>> Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including
>> Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate
>> Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration
>> Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments
>> Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <
>> wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> *On Behalf Of *Rob Rowley
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:03 AM
>> *To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
>> *Subject:* [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
>>
>>
>>
>> Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling
>> which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon
>> owner's intent to sell or occupy.? Dealing with the federal CDC eviction
>> moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district
>> court.? Oral argument on May 13.
>>
>>
>> https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
>>
>> I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction
>> hearings.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Robert R Rowley*
>> Attorney & Counselor at Law
>>? (509) 252-5074 <(509)%20252-5074>? (509) 994-1143 <(509)%20994-1143>
>>? (509) 928-3084? rowleylegal.com <http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
>>? rob at rowleylegal.com
>> Helping You Protect What Matters Most
>> <https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>
>> <https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
>>
>> *Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters
>> in Washington and Idaho. *
>>
>> NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected
>> by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable
>> protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this
>> message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message.
>> Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that
>> responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or
>> face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal
>> inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal
>> opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
>>
>>
>> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
>> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
>> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
>> others.***
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WSBARP mailing list
>> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
>> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
>
>
> --
> Thank you,
>
> Kaitlyn R. Jackson | Attorney| DIMENSION LAW GROUP PLLC
> 130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 | Tukwila, WA 98188
> t: *206.973.3500 *| f: *206.577.5090*| e: *kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com*|
> www.dimensionlaw.com
>
> Covid-19 Update - Dimension Law Group remains available to serve our
> clients and the public during this time, subject to the orders and
> recommendations of government authority.
>
> All attorneys and staff are working remotely regular business hours and
> are available via email and by phone. Videoconferencing also is available. We
> will continue to advise and support our clients throughout this health
> emergency.
>
--
Thank you,
Kaitlyn R. Jackson | Attorney| DIMENSION LAW GROUP PLLC
130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 | Tukwila, WA 98188
t: *206.973.3500 *| f: *206.577.5090*| e: *kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com*|
www.dimensionlaw.com
Covid-19 Update - Dimension Law Group remains available to serve our
clients and the public during this time, subject to the orders and
recommendations of government authority.
All attorneys and staff are working remotely regular business hours and are
available via email and by phone. Videoconferencing also is available. We
will continue to advise and support our clients throughout this health
emergency.
--
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:??This e-mail (including any attachments) is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may
contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the
intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Attempts to intercept
this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) of the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the interceptor to fines,
imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone;
return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper
and electronic copies.?Any settlement offer contained herein is made
pursuant to Washington ER 408, and without admitting fault or liability on
the part of this firm?s client(s) or its agents.??IRS?CIRCULAR?230
DISCLAIMER:??To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I
inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication
(including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image002-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image003-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image005-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image006-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image007-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image008-0001.png>
------------------------------
***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
End of WSBARP Digest, Vol 78, Issue 6
*************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210310/192b9e85/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:01:26 +0000
From: Craig Gourley <craig at glgmail.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Condo dues foreclosure
Message-ID:
<MW3PR12MB4346A3B6B7D6E475B60BF9D3AE919 at MW3PR12MB4346.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reposting this. Has anyone had an issue with foreclosure on codo dues? I don'tthinkit is covered under the moratorium but.wondering if courts are enforcing these actions in light if covid. Thanks
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210310/30add888/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:31:41 -0800
From: "Samuel M. Meyler" <samuel at meylerlegal.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Condo dues foreclosure
Message-ID: <14B915B7-5A5D-47DD-8BA2-0CD8C0D44051 at meylerlegal.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Craig,
Check out the Governor?s Proclamation 20-51 et seq. The current version prevents condominiums and HOAs from charging late fees for delinquent assessments but does not outright restrict foreclosure. I believe the original version did restrict foreclosure but that has since been amended.
Samuel M. Meyler
Meyler Legal, PLLC
1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
Seattle, WA 98109
Main: 206-876-7770
Fax: 206-876-7771
Direct: 206-876-7772
Email: samuel at meylerlegal.com
NOTICE:
This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments. Thank you.
> On Mar 10, 2021, at 6:09 AM, Craig Gourley <craig at glgmail.com> wrote:
> ?
> Reposting this. Has anyone had an issue with foreclosure on codo dues? I don'tthinkit is covered under the moratorium but.wondering if courts are enforcing these actions in light if covid. Thanks
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
> Get Outlook for Android
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210310/56e9b08d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:37:12 +0000
From: Craig Gourley <craig at glgmail.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Condo dues foreclosure
Message-ID:
<MW3PR12MB43464BF7BD9EED8E7953DF43AE919 at MW3PR12MB4346.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Thank you. I know that courts and in some cases local law enforcement have refused to enforce actions eviction allowed under the moratorium and was wondering if anyone had that same experience with hoa dues actions.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
________________________________
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> on behalf of Samuel M. Meyler <samuel at meylerlegal.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 8:31:41 AM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Condo dues foreclosure
Craig,
Check out the Governor?s Proclamation 20-51 et seq. The current version prevents condominiums and HOAs from charging late fees for delinquent assessments but does not outright restrict foreclosure. I believe the original version did restrict foreclosure but that has since been amended.
Samuel M. Meyler
Meyler Legal, PLLC
1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
Seattle, WA 98109
Main: 206-876-7770
Fax: 206-876-7771
Direct: 206-876-7772
Email: samuel at meylerlegal.com
NOTICE:
This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments. Thank you.
On Mar 10, 2021, at 6:09 AM, Craig Gourley <craig at glgmail.com> wrote:
?
Reposting this. Has anyone had an issue with foreclosure on codo dues? I don'tthinkit is covered under the moratorium but.wondering if courts are enforcing these actions in light if covid. Thanks
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210310/3a97c744/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:54:36 -0800
From: <Jeff at bellanddavispllc.com>
To: "'Stephen Whitehouse'" <swhite8893 at aol.com>, "'WSBA Real Property
Listserv'" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>,
<wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] WSBARP Digest, Vol 78, Issue 6
Message-ID: <006c01d715ce$0e4072f0$2ac158d0$@bellanddavispllc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Steve,
The trail is not in the easement. The easement is a full, 60 foot, roadway easement that comes in from the south and terminates with a turn around that is partially on the south side of the lot on the right side. The trial comes in from the right side lot?s north boundary. It is a walking trail and then people walk, or ride bikes, through that lot until they reach the turn around.
The right lot is in a different short plat than my clients. The easements benefit each lot in the two separate short plats. Although it is a 60 foot easement, it is still a private road. I am of the opinion that individual lot owners cannot open up the easement for use by non-lot owners, except for quests, but not the public in general. Yes, I agree with you that the owner, who opened the trail, can allow people to access his lot, only.
Jeff
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Stephen Whitehouse
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 7:48 PM
To: wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com; wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] WSBARP Digest, Vol 78, Issue 6
Jeff,
Your facts are not fully clear. Is the trail in the easement? Are there any restrictions on the short plats? Is the easement exclusive?
So let me hazard a guess that the trail is over the easement and is solely over the property on the right, there are no restrictions and it is not exclusive. As a general rule, the owner on
the right can allow other people to use the easement area, but only the part on his/her lot and the other people cannot restrict it unless it is interfering with the use of the easement rights
by the other easement holders, or is creating a nuisance.
Where does the easement go to? Who controls the property at the end of the easement? That may be an issue as well.
Steve
Stephen Whitehouse
Whitehouse & Nichols, LLP
P.O. Box 1273
601 W. Railroad Ave.
Shelton, Wa. 98584
360-426-5885
<mailto:swhite8893 at aol.com> swhite8893 at aol.com
-----Original Message-----
From: wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com>
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Sent: Tue, Mar 9, 2021 12:00 pm
Subject: WSBARP Digest, Vol 78, Issue 6
Send WSBARP mailing list submissions to
wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com>
You can reach the person managing the list at
wsbarp-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of WSBARP digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. HOA dues foreclosure under covid (Craig Gourley)
2. Adjoining Short Plat Lot Owner Opens Walking Trail and allows
Public Use (Jeff at bellanddavispllc.com <mailto:Jeff at bellanddavispllc.com> )
3. lfp problem (Roger Hawkes)
4. Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury (Rob Rowley)
5. Re: Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
(Tom Westbrook)
6. Re: Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
(Bryce Dille)
7. Re: Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
(Tom Westbrook)
8. Re: Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
(Kaitlyn Jackson)
9. Re: Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
(Kaitlyn Jackson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 13:50:38 +0000
From: Craig Gourley <craig at glgmail.com <mailto:craig at glgmail.com> >
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: [WSBARP] HOA dues foreclosure under covid
Message-ID:
<MW3PR12MB43468D436EBF8CA63620B43DAE929 at MW3PR12MB4346.namprd12.prod.outlook.com <mailto:MW3PR12MB43468D436EBF8CA63620B43DAE929 at MW3PR12MB4346.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Listmates. Has anyone had experience with Condo dues foreclosure under covid? I don't recall it being addressed in any moratorium but am wondering about real world enforcement by the courts. Thanks to all.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/a2fb96b6/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:39:02 -0800
From: <Jeff at bellanddavispllc.com <mailto:Jeff at bellanddavispllc.com> >
To: <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: [WSBARP] Adjoining Short Plat Lot Owner Opens Walking Trail
and allows Public Use
Message-ID: <00f201d71513$7aed6860$70c83920$@bellanddavispllc.com <mailto:00f201d71513$7aed6860$70c83920$@bellanddavispllc.com> >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Listmates,
Two separate, but adjoining short plats share a common ingress/egress
easement. An owner, in the "short plat on the right" opened a walking
trail through his lot and allows the general public to use it. This allows
people from outside the two short plats to go through lots and resulted in
increased litter and pet problems. Questions are: 1) can the other lots
owners require the one to block access through his property, or 2) can other
lot owners block non-easement holders access through their properties? I
think the answer is yes, at least to #2, but in today's uncertain world, I
would like your opinions.
Jeff Davis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/52553b9c/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 18:50:53 +0000
From: Roger Hawkes <Roger at law-hawks.com <mailto:Roger at law-hawks.com> >
To: Real Property Listserve <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: [WSBARP] lfp problem
Message-ID:
<MN2PR16MB2750E525EBF72A5EF5CC6627E9929 at MN2PR16MB2750.namprd16.prod.outlook.com <mailto:MN2PR16MB2750E525EBF72A5EF5CC6627E9929 at MN2PR16MB2750.namprd16.prod.outlook.com> >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I am looking to refer a good client to a lawyer who has dealt with Lake Forest Park before and knows about respective rights and obligations between landowner and government. It appears that my client's home is threatened by erosion created by faulty construction of a sewer on her property , by the city.
Roger Hawkes, WSBA # 5173 [cid:image001.jpg at 01D714D2.135145A0 <mailto:image001.jpg at 01D714D2.135145A0> ]
Shoreline Office: 19944 Ballinger Way NE
Shoreline, WA 98155
Sultan Office: 423 Main
Sultan, WA 98294
Phone: 206 367 5000; fax: 206 367 4005
Email: roger at law-hawks.com <mailto:roger at law-hawks.com> <mailto:roger at law-hawks.com <mailto:roger at law-hawks.com> >
Web site: www.hawkeslawfirm.com<http://www.hawkeslawfirm.com/>
.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/0056b7e7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6963 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/0056b7e7/image001-0001.jpg>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:03:01 -0800
From: Rob Rowley <rob at rowleylegal.com <mailto:rob at rowleylegal.com> >
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
Message-ID: <23e9565525bef269332c28dbddcbdb2b at mail.gmail.com <mailto:23e9565525bef269332c28dbddcbdb2b at mail.gmail.com> >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling
which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon
owner's intent to sell or occupy. Dealing with the federal CDC eviction
moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district
court. Oral argument on May 13.
https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction
hearings.
*Robert R Rowley*
Attorney & Counselor at Law
(509) 252-5074 (509) 994-1143
(509) 928-3084 <fax:(509)%20928-3084> rowleylegal.com
<http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
rob at rowleylegal.com <mailto:rob at rowleylegal.com>
Helping You Protect What Matters Most
<https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>
<https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
*Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters
in Washington and Idaho. *
NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected
by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable
protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this
message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message.
Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that
responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or
face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal
inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal
opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image017.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image017-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image018.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image018-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image019.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image019-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image020.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image020-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image021.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image021-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image022.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image022-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image023.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image023-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image024.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/eab087d9/image024-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:14:10 -0800
From: Tom Westbrook <tjw at w3net.net <mailto:tjw at w3net.net> >
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v
Drury
Message-ID: <6723db35fef3107f7d249651d238309e at mail.gmail.com <mailto:6723db35fef3107f7d249651d238309e at mail.gmail.com> >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Yes???Ugh!
Sincerely,
Tom
Thomas J. Westbrook
Attorney at Law
Rodgers Kee Card & Strophy, P.S.
324 West Bay Drive NW, Suite 201
Olympia, Washington 98502
Phone: 360-352-8311
Facsimile: 360-352-8501
Email: tjw at buddbaylaw.com <mailto:tjw at buddbaylaw.com>
Skype: thomas.westbrook
www.buddbaylaw.com <http://www.buddbaylaw.com>
The information contained in this email and attachment(s) are for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain private, privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the addressee, you are
strictly prohibited from reading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise
using this email or its contents in any way. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at
360-352-8311 or by e-mail to reception at buddbaylaw.com <mailto:reception at buddbaylaw.com> , and destroy the
original message from your electronic files.
COVID-19 UPDATE:
s Rodgers Kee Card & Strophy will no longer maintain ?open? hours at the
physical office.
s All the staff is working remotely. We are routinely monitoring our voice
mail and email, which is the best way to communicate during this period.
s We are still taking new clients but consultations will be telephonic or
via video conferencing, and any in-person meetings will be by appointment
and only if necessary to execute documents.
s Please provide necessary documents to us by scan and email, where
possible, or by mail if not.
s We anticipate these changes will be effective for the foreseeable
future. We are doing everything we can to maintain the level of service
and professionalism we?ve always provided, even in the face of this public
health crisis. Thank you in advance for your patience and understanding.
We look forward to the soonest possible return to full operations and
continued service to our clients.
*From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
*On Behalf Of *Rob Rowley
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 09, 2021 11:03 AM
*To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
*Subject:* [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling
which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon
owner's intent to sell or occupy. Dealing with the federal CDC eviction
moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district
court. Oral argument on May 13.
https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction
hearings.
*Robert R Rowley*
Attorney & Counselor at Law
(509) 252-5074 (509) 994-1143
(509) 928-3084 <fax:(509)%20928-3084> rowleylegal.com
<http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
rob at rowleylegal.com <mailto:rob at rowleylegal.com>
Helping You Protect What Matters Most
<https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>
<https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
*Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters
in Washington and Idaho. *
NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected
by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable
protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this
message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message.
Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that
responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or
face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal
inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal
opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 15390 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image002-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image003-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image005-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image006-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image007-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image008-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/490e7cce/image009-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 19:33:23 +0000
From: Bryce Dille <Bryce at dillelaw.com <mailto:Bryce at dillelaw.com> >
To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v
Drury
Message-ID:
<MW3PR11MB45883E6BBE53B7B9C5C45C23C8929 at MW3PR11MB4588.namprd11.prod.outlook.com <mailto:MW3PR11MB45883E6BBE53B7B9C5C45C23C8929 at MW3PR11MB4588.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
What about evictions arising out of non landlord tenant situations where PR is attempting to evict a family member from decedents house after 60 day notice to sell was given and we are in action for ejectment.
Bryce H. Dille
Dille Law, PLLC
2010 Caton Way SW Ste. 101
Olympia, WA 98502
Office: 360-350-0270
Cell: 253-579-5561
** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**
This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s). If this matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender immediately.
Business Entity Creation and Management, Business, Government and Tax Law, Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> > On Behalf Of Rob Rowley
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:03 AM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon owner's intent to sell or occupy. Dealing with the federal CDC eviction moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district court. Oral argument on May 13.
https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction hearings.
[cid:image001.jpg at 01D714D8.0334EA90 <mailto:image001.jpg at 01D714D8.0334EA90> ]
Robert R Rowley
Attorney & Counselor at Law
[cid:image002.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90 <mailto:image002.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90> ] (509) 252-5074<tel:(509)%20252-5074> [cid:image003.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90 <mailto:image003.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90> ] (509) 994-1143<tel:(509)%20994-1143>
[cid:image004.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90 <mailto:image004.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90> ] (509) 928-3084<fax:(509)%20928-3084> [cid:image005.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90 <mailto:image005.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90> ] rowleylegal.com<http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
[cid:image006.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90 <mailto:image006.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90> ] rob at rowleylegal.com <mailto:rob at rowleylegal.com> <mailto:rob at rowleylegal.com <mailto:rob at rowleylegal.com> >
Helping You Protect What Matters Most
[cid:image007.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90 <mailto:image007.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90> ]<https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal> [cid:image008.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90 <mailto:image008.png at 01D714D8.0334EA90> ] <https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters in Washington and Idaho.
NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message. Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image002-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image003-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: image005.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image005-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: image006.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image006-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: image007.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image007-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: image008.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/615ee130/image008-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:38:28 -0800
From: Tom Westbrook <tjw at w3net.net <mailto:tjw at w3net.net> >
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v
Drury
Message-ID: <61e0a6ce1e323385eb9ee9f00cd94de9 at mail.gmail.com <mailto:61e0a6ce1e323385eb9ee9f00cd94de9 at mail.gmail.com> >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Bryce, I have the same concern time 3 in various stages of the 60 day
period. I guess the question is, how will our Superior Court Judges react
to this?
Sincerely,
Tom
Thomas J. Westbrook
Attorney at Law
Rodgers Kee Card & Strophy, P.S.
324 West Bay Drive NW, Suite 201
Olympia, Washington 98502
Phone: 360-352-8311
Facsimile: 360-352-8501
Email: tjw at buddbaylaw.com <mailto:tjw at buddbaylaw.com>
Skype: thomas.westbrook
www.buddbaylaw.com <http://www.buddbaylaw.com>
The information contained in this email and attachment(s) are for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain private, privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the addressee, you are
strictly prohibited from reading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise
using this email or its contents in any way. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at
360-352-8311 or by e-mail to reception at buddbaylaw.com, and destroy the
original message from your electronic files.
COVID-19 UPDATE:
s Rodgers Kee Card & Strophy will no longer maintain ?open? hours at the
physical office.
s All the staff is working remotely. We are routinely monitoring our voice
mail and email, which is the best way to communicate during this period.
s We are still taking new clients but consultations will be telephonic or
via video conferencing, and any in-person meetings will be by appointment
and only if necessary to execute documents.
s Please provide necessary documents to us by scan and email, where
possible, or by mail if not.
s We anticipate these changes will be effective for the foreseeable
future. We are doing everything we can to maintain the level of service
and professionalism we?ve always provided, even in the face of this public
health crisis. Thank you in advance for your patience and understanding.
We look forward to the soonest possible return to full operations and
continued service to our clients.
*From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
*On Behalf Of *Bryce Dille
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 09, 2021 11:33 AM
*To:* 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
*Subject:* Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
What about evictions arising out of non landlord tenant situations where PR
is attempting to evict a family member from decedents house after 60 day
notice to sell was given and we are in action for ejectment.
Bryce H. Dille
Dille Law, PLLC
2010 Caton Way SW Ste. 101
Olympia, WA 98502
Office: 360-350-0270
Cell: 253-579-5561
** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that
sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**
This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and
may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s). If this
matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender
immediately.
Business Entity Creation and Management, Business, Government and Tax Law,
Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium
Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including
Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate
Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration
Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments
Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures.
*From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
*On Behalf Of *Rob Rowley
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:03 AM
*To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
*Subject:* [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling
which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon
owner's intent to sell or occupy. Dealing with the federal CDC eviction
moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district
court. Oral argument on May 13.
https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction
hearings.
*Robert R Rowley*
Attorney & Counselor at Law
(509) 252-5074 (509) 994-1143
(509) 928-3084 <fax:(509)%20928-3084> rowleylegal.com
<http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
rob at rowleylegal.com <mailto:rob at rowleylegal.com>
Helping You Protect What Matters Most
<https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>
<https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
*Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters
in Washington and Idaho. *
NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected
by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable
protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this
message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message.
Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that
responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or
face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal
inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal
opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 15390 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image009-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image010.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image010-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image011.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image011-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image012.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image012-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image013.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image013-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image014.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image014-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image015.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image015-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image016.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image016-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image017.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/c75a904a/image017-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:41:47 -0800
From: Kaitlyn Jackson <kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com <mailto:kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com> >
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v
Drury
Message-ID:
<CAO+NF_464x2QFfkwAuUJkO0YLS8Sdn9D+b6sW=mC4j-ZjTV6sw at mail.gmail.com <mailto:mC4j-ZjTV6sw at mail.gmail.com> >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Bryce -
Theoretically, if the occupant submits the CDC Declaration, then under the
current legal justification, the occupant would be protected.
If you look at the CDC's terribly drafted "Order" you will see it applies
to a "landlord, owner of a residential property, or other person with a
legal right to pursue eviction or possessory action" and "covered persons"
are defined as "tenant, lessee, or resident of a residential property."
The way I read it is that under the broad interpretation being applied, it
even applies to a squatter or a trespasser. The CDC's Order does not (to my
knowledge) even require the person, be on the property legally.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 11:36 AM Bryce Dille <Bryce at dillelaw.com <mailto:Bryce at dillelaw.com> > wrote:
> What about evictions arising out of non landlord tenant situations where
> PR is attempting to evict a family member from decedents house after 60 day
> notice to sell was given and we are in action for ejectment.
>
>
>
> Bryce H. Dille
>
> Dille Law, PLLC
>
> 2010 Caton Way SW Ste. 101
>
> Olympia, WA 98502
>
> Office: 360-350-0270
>
> Cell: 253-579-5561
>
>
>
> ** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that
> sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**
>
>
>
> This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and
> may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s). If this
> matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender
> immediately.
>
>
>
> Business Entity Creation and Management, Business, Government and Tax Law,
> Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium
> Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including
> Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate
> Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration
> Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments
> Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures.
>
>
>
> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <
> wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> > *On Behalf Of *Rob Rowley
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:03 AM
> *To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
> *Subject:* [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
>
>
>
> Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling
> which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon
> owner's intent to sell or occupy. Dealing with the federal CDC eviction
> moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district
> court. Oral argument on May 13.
>
>
> https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
>
> I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction
> hearings.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Robert R Rowley*
> Attorney & Counselor at Law
> (509) 252-5074 <(509)%20252-5074> (509) 994-1143 <(509)%20994-1143>
> (509) 928-3084 rowleylegal.com <http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
> rob at rowleylegal.com <mailto:rob at rowleylegal.com>
> Helping You Protect What Matters Most
> <https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>
> <https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
>
> *Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters
> in Washington and Idaho. *
>
> NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected
> by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable
> protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this
> message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message.
> Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that
> responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or
> face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal
> inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal
> opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
>
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
> others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
--
Thank you,
Kaitlyn R. Jackson | Attorney| DIMENSION LAW GROUP PLLC
130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 | Tukwila, WA 98188
t: *206.973.3500 *| f: *206.577.5090*| e: *kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com <mailto:kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com> *|
www.dimensionlaw.com <http://www.dimensionlaw.com>
Covid-19 Update - Dimension Law Group remains available to serve our
clients and the public during this time, subject to the orders and
recommendations of government authority.
All attorneys and staff are working remotely regular business hours and are
available via email and by phone. Videoconferencing also is available. We
will continue to advise and support our clients throughout this health
emergency.
--
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:??This e-mail (including any attachments) is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may
contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the
intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Attempts to intercept
this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) of the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the interceptor to fines,
imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone;
return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper
and electronic copies.?Any settlement offer contained herein is made
pursuant to Washington ER 408, and without admitting fault or liability on
the part of this firm?s client(s) or its agents.??IRS?CIRCULAR?230
DISCLAIMER:??To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I
inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication
(including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image002-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image003-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image005-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image006-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image007-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/73f2e83b/image008-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:48:19 -0800
From: Kaitlyn Jackson <kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com <mailto:kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com> >
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v
Drury
Message-ID:
<CAO+NF_77m2aYtTxK+v0eZfHa_8qbmFcJxgirjBQzajVu-cjc3w at mail.gmail.com <mailto:v0eZfHa_8qbmFcJxgirjBQzajVu-cjc3w at mail.gmail.com> >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Bryce -
Let me correct. In the Order, they further define "Residential Property" as
"property leased for residential purposes...". So, you might be able to
argue the CDC Order does not apply. However, if there's any evidence that
the occupant *paid *for anything that could be construed to create an
implied contract to rent, then the CDC could be argued to apply.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 11:41 AM Kaitlyn Jackson <kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com <mailto:kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com> >
wrote:
> Bryce -
>
> Theoretically, if the occupant submits the CDC Declaration, then under the
> current legal justification, the occupant would be protected.
>
> If you look at the CDC's terribly drafted "Order" you will see it applies
> to a "landlord, owner of a residential property, or other person with a
> legal right to pursue eviction or possessory action" and "covered persons"
> are defined as "tenant, lessee, or resident of a residential property."
>
> The way I read it is that under the broad interpretation being applied, it
> even applies to a squatter or a trespasser. The CDC's Order does not (to my
> knowledge) even require the person, be on the property legally.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 11:36 AM Bryce Dille <Bryce at dillelaw.com <mailto:Bryce at dillelaw.com> > wrote:
>
>> What about evictions arising out of non landlord tenant situations where
>> PR is attempting to evict a family member from decedents house after 60 day
>> notice to sell was given and we are in action for ejectment.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bryce H. Dille
>>
>> Dille Law, PLLC
>>
>> 2010 Caton Way SW Ste. 101
>>
>> Olympia, WA 98502
>>
>> Office: 360-350-0270
>>
>> Cell: 253-579-5561
>>
>>
>>
>> ** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that
>> sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**
>>
>>
>>
>> This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications
>> and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s). If
>> this matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender
>> immediately.
>>
>>
>>
>> Business Entity Creation and Management, Business, Government and Tax
>> Law, Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium
>> Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including
>> Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate
>> Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration
>> Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments
>> Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <
>> wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> > *On Behalf Of *Rob Rowley
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:03 AM
>> *To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
>> *Subject:* [WSBARP] Supreme Court - Eviction Moratorium - McCrea v Drury
>>
>>
>>
>> Any thoughts on the February 4, 2021 Supreme Court commissioners ruling
>> which raised issues with evictions related to terminations based upon
>> owner's intent to sell or occupy. Dealing with the federal CDC eviction
>> moratorium being declared unconstitutional by a Texas federal district
>> court. Oral argument on May 13.
>>
>>
>> https://www.landlordsolutionsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WSC-ruling-staying-eviction.pdf
>>
>> I understand we can still issue notices just not proceed with eviction
>> hearings.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Robert R Rowley*
>> Attorney & Counselor at Law
>> (509) 252-5074 <(509)%20252-5074> (509) 994-1143 <(509)%20994-1143>
>> (509) 928-3084 rowleylegal.com <http://www.rowleylegal.com/>
>> rob at rowleylegal.com <mailto:rob at rowleylegal.com>
>> Helping You Protect What Matters Most
>> <https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>
>> <https://www.twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
>>
>> *Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters
>> in Washington and Idaho. *
>>
>> NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected
>> by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable
>> protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this
>> message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message.
>> Thank you for your assistance. DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that
>> responses provided by e-mail means are akin to ordinary telephone or
>> face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or legal
>> inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal
>> opinion. A formal opinion may very well reach a different conclusion.
>>
>>
>> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
>> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
>> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
>> others.***
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WSBARP mailing list
>> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
>> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
>
>
> --
> Thank you,
>
> Kaitlyn R. Jackson | Attorney| DIMENSION LAW GROUP PLLC
> 130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 | Tukwila, WA 98188
> t: *206.973.3500 *| f: *206.577.5090*| e: *kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com <mailto:kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com> *|
> www.dimensionlaw.com
>
> Covid-19 Update - Dimension Law Group remains available to serve our
> clients and the public during this time, subject to the orders and
> recommendations of government authority.
>
> All attorneys and staff are working remotely regular business hours and
> are available via email and by phone. Videoconferencing also is available. We
> will continue to advise and support our clients throughout this health
> emergency.
>
--
Thank you,
Kaitlyn R. Jackson | Attorney| DIMENSION LAW GROUP PLLC
130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 | Tukwila, WA 98188
t: *206.973.3500 *| f: *206.577.5090*| e: *kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com <mailto:kaitlyn at dimensionlaw.com> *|
www.dimensionlaw.com
Covid-19 Update - Dimension Law Group remains available to serve our
clients and the public during this time, subject to the orders and
recommendations of government authority.
All attorneys and staff are working remotely regular business hours and are
available via email and by phone. Videoconferencing also is available. We
will continue to advise and support our clients throughout this health
emergency.
--
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:??This e-mail (including any attachments) is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may
contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the
intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Attempts to intercept
this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) of the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the interceptor to fines,
imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone;
return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper
and electronic copies.?Any settlement offer contained herein is made
pursuant to Washington ER 408, and without admitting fault or liability on
the part of this firm?s client(s) or its agents.??IRS?CIRCULAR?230
DISCLAIMER:??To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I
inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication
(including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and
cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image002-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 388 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image003-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image005-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image006-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 690 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image007-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.png
Type: image/png
Size: 714 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210309/d3380592/image008-0001.png>
------------------------------
***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
End of WSBARP Digest, Vol 78, Issue 6
*************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210310/93b5f5c1/attachment.html>
------------------------------
***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
End of WSBARP Digest, Vol 78, Issue 7
*************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210310/f1fecb32/attachment.html>
More information about the WSBARP
mailing list