[WSBARP] WSBARP Digest, Vol 82, Issue 17

Wed Jul 14 23:05:21 PDT 2021

Thank you to all for the aerial photo sources! I will save the info this time in its own folder.

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> on behalf of STEPHEN WHITEHOUSE <swhite8893 at aol.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 6:12:58 PM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] WSBARP Digest, Vol 82, Issue 17

Craig,
      If it is salt waterfront, the DOE Coastal Zone Atlas. DNR and DOT have a number going back to the mid 60’s. You access them through Terry Curtis at DNR. I have his contact information if you want to call. Google has some. I don’t have the details but Terry Curtis can access. There is also a series from the US Department of Agraculture from the mid-50’s.

Steve Whitehouse

Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 14, 2021, at 6:42 PM, wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com wrote:
>
> Send WSBARP mailing list submissions to
>    wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    wsbarp-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of WSBARP digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: New Division III Published Opinions (Ann Marshall)
>   2. Aerial photos (Craig Gourley)
>   3. Re: Aerial photos (scott at scottgthomaslaw.com)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 19:21:50 +0000
> From: Ann Marshall <AMarshall at jamsadr.com>
> To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: Re: [WSBARP] New Division III Published Opinions
> Message-ID:
>    <MW3PR18MB3484BE3D2556AB92D64B81C1B2139 at MW3PR18MB3484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> Hi Rod:
>
> This was my takeaway. The court discussed a Texas case where the waiver or delay in accrual of the statute of limitations was for a "specific and reasonable time"?namely, a pre-determined length. In the Texas case, a 4-year statute replaced a 2-year statute by agreement, and that was enforceable. And then after discussing that, the court in Gunzel also said the below (which I admittedly find a bit more difficult to summarize!):
>
>
> We might uphold the contractual modification if it read that the limitation period for any suit to enforce the obligation on the guaranty shall not commence to run until the last payment on the debt or guaranty made by the lender or the guarantor. As already analyzed, this latter language is not in the form of a waiver. Oregon law generally upholds a contract change to the statute of limitations. Thus, our ruling may promote form over substance, because the same result follows from our hypothetical language as from the actual language in the guaranty.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [cid:image005.png at 01D46634.8C1313A0]
>
> Ann T. Marshall, Esq.
> Mediator/Arbitrator
>
>
>
> JAMS - Local Solutions. Global Reach.TM
>
> 1420 Fifth Ave. | #1650 | Seattle, WA  98101
>
> Cell/Text: 206.619.8043
>
> Office: 206.292.0441
>
> E-mail: amarshall at jamsadr.com
>
> www.jamsadr.com<https://www.jamsadr.com/marshall/>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> on behalf of Rod Harmon <rodharmon at msn.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 10:04 AM
> To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: Re: [WSBARP] New Division III Published Opinions
>
>
> Makes me curious as to how the court suggested the waiver could have been written so as to be enforceable.
>
>
>
> Rod Harmon
>
>
>
> RODNEY T. HARMON
>
>       Attorney at Law
>
>         P.O. Box 1066
>
>      Bothell, WA   98041
>
>     Tel:   (425) 402-7800
>
>     Fax:  (425) 458-9096
>
>    www.rodharmon.com<http://www.rodharmon.com>
>
>   rodharmon at msn.com<mailto:rodharmon at msn.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com On Behalf Of Ann Marshall
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 12:23 PM
> To: wsbarp at LISTS.WSBARPPT.COM
> Subject: Re: [WSBARP] New Division III Published Opinions
>
>
>
> Hi Cat, and All:
>
>
>
> I wrote a summary of that case?here it is in case it's helpful to anyone:
>
>
>
> Umpqua Bank v. Gunzel, No. 37400-9-III, 2021 WL 1134956 (Wash. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2021)
>
>
>
> Applying Oregon law, the court held that a claim against the guarantor of a commercial loan was barred by the statute of limitations. The court held that the statute of limitations commenced on the first default by the borrower and, unlike the statute of limitations for the promissory note itself, was not extended by periodic payments on the obligation that were made after the first default.
>
>
>
> FACTS: Cornerstone, a corporation, obtained a loan from Umpqua. Mr. Gunzel, the president and owner of Cornerstone, guaranteed the loan and signed a guaranty. The maturity date passed, and the note was not paid in full. The corporation dissolved, but some partial payments continued for approximately 4 years after the maturity date. Umpqua brought suit on the guaranty 9 years after the maturity date/first default passed. The guaranty provided that Oregon law governed.
>
>
>
> ANALYSIS: Oregon has a 6-year statute of limitations for breach of contract. Another statute provides that the limitation period on a debt owed does not commence until the last payment made by the borrower. The court stated that the accrual date on the statute of limitations on the promissory note versus the guaranty are different. The court discussed that a guarantor's liability generally arises at the time of the default of the borrower on the obligations which the guaranty covers. The court further stated that it is the majority, if not universal, rule that a payment by a principal debtor will not toll the statute of limitations as to a guarantor.
>
>
>
> The guaranty provided the statute of limitations was waived in the event that ?there was an outstanding Indebtedness not barred by any applicable statute of limitations.? The court noted that, as a general proposition, parties can agree to a statute of limitations different from that provided by statute, but whether to enforce the waiver turns on Oregon public policy. In analyzing public policy, the court, along with a discussion of the general rule in other jurisdictions, relied upon an Oregon supreme court case from 1886 that analogized a waiver of the statute of limitations to an agreement forgoing the defense of usury. As written, the court held the partial waiver of the protection of the statute of limitations was unenforceable. The court also discussed alternative language that would result in expanding the time to enforce the guaranty to match the enforceability of the promissory note. The court also awarded attorney?s fees and costs to Gunzel.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [cid:image001.png at 01D5C70D.13C5A580]
>
> Ann T. Marshall, Esq.
> Mediator/Arbitrator
>
>
>
> JAMS - Local Solutions. Global Reach.TM
>
> 1420 Fifth Ave. | #1650 | Seattle, WA  98101
>
> Cell/Text: 206.619.8043
>
> Office: 206.292.0441
>
> E-mail: amarshall at jamsadr.com<mailto:amarshall at jamsadr.com>
>
> www.jamsadr.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jamsadr.com%2Fmarshall%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cfa489a30029644a771a808d94634784c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637618013436317559%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=NlJLz7aYKWH1lWiqVEoBwXBf9PcaQrx0Pn%2F6UuyLnfY%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> on behalf of Catherine Clark <Cat at loccc.com<mailto:Cat at loccc.com>>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 11:05 AM
> To: wsbarp at LISTS.WSBARPPT.COM<mailto:wsbarp at LISTS.WSBARPPT.COM> <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
> Subject: [WSBARP] FW: New Division III Published Opinions
>
>
>
> All:
>
> This is an interesting case on statutes of limitation and defaults on loans under Oregon law and suit on the personal guarantee.
>
> Mar. 25, 2021 - 37400-9 - Umpqua Bank v. Charles A. Gunzel III, et al
> https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/?fa=opinions.disp&filename=374009MAJ<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.courts.wa.gov%2Fopinions%2F%3Ffa%3Dopinions.disp%26filename%3D374009MAJ&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cfa489a30029644a771a808d94634784c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637618013436317559%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=kg9StBw3o9hm2Ndboj0OvhVgP0N8pX3lDMlwhm0nnz4%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Catherine ?Cat? Clark
> Law Office of Catherine C. Clark PLLC
> 2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1250
> Seattle, WA 98121
> Phone:  (206) 838-2528
> Cell:  (206) 409-8938
> Fax: (206) 374-3003
> Email:  cat at loccc.com<mailto:cat at loccc.com>
>
> NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic information transmission is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited.  If you received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone at (206) 838-2528. Thank you.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: COA DIV III Published Opinions - Self Subscribe <COADIVIIIPUBLISHEDOPINIONS at LISTSERV.COURTS.WA.GOV<mailto:COADIVIIIPUBLISHEDOPINIONS at LISTSERV.COURTS.WA.GOV>> On Behalf Of Court Notifications
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 9:40 AM
> To: COADIVIIIPUBLISHEDOPINIONS at LISTSERV.COURTS.WA.GOV<mailto:COADIVIIIPUBLISHEDOPINIONS at LISTSERV.COURTS.WA.GOV>
> Subject: New Division III Published Opinions
>
> Washington Courts Opinion Notification Email
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> New Division III Published Opinions as of Tuesday, July 13
>
> Mar. 25, 2021 - 37400-9 - Umpqua Bank v. Charles A. Gunzel III, et al
> https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/?fa=opinions.disp&filename=374009MAJ<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.courts.wa.gov%2Fopinions%2F%3Ffa%3Dopinions.disp%26filename%3D374009MAJ&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cfa489a30029644a771a808d94634784c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637618013436327512%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=LBDvOXPnZS1jjNiJyrmqHRqI3XaDEQTZL2ZbXtohwH0%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> All opinions filed within the last 14 days can be viewed at https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/index.cfm?fa=opinions.recent<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.courts.wa.gov%2Fopinions%2Findex.cfm%3Ffa%3Dopinions.recent&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cfa489a30029644a771a808d94634784c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637618013436327512%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=BdwZ%2BCEQgyks%2BTdqmXnUgpi55UGLl0BIOvxfQsTTTOc%3D&reserved=0>
> All opinions filed within the last 90 days can be viewed at https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/index.cfm?fa=opinions.displayAll<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.courts.wa.gov%2Fopinions%2Findex.cfm%3Ffa%3Dopinions.displayAll&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cfa489a30029644a771a808d94634784c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637618013436327512%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=yuKQF2fge8jZTbhB%2BRU%2F57Kh6CgfjnXInvr6EdrhlpA%3D&reserved=0>
>
> These opinions are slip opinions which do not necessarily represent the court's final decision in the case since they are subject to reconsideration, modification orders, editorial corrections, and withdrawal. The official reports advance sheets and bound volumes supersede the slip opinions. To subscribe to the official reports, call 800-223-1940 or visit www.lexisnexis.com/waofficialreports<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lexisnexis.com%2Fwaofficialreports&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cfa489a30029644a771a808d94634784c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637618013436337469%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=xJ2NV2HR0L0ubUWrIqSun87yZsgRRiA%2FHzWi%2F9lOXf0%3D&reserved=0<http://www.lexisnexis.com/waofficialreports<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lexisnexis.com%2Fwaofficialreports&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cfa489a30029644a771a808d94634784c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637618013436337469%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=xJ2NV2HR0L0ubUWrIqSun87yZsgRRiA%2FHzWi%2F9lOXf0%3D&reserved=0>>.
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> If you have any questions about this notification, or any difficulties accessing the opinions, please contact our customer support center at https://AOC.custhelp.com/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faoc.custhelp.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cfa489a30029644a771a808d94634784c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637618013436337469%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=%2BJ8DlkatY2NXMSA%2F%2BmCWT8TObgPwQRMC%2BG0Ft2e%2BXTc%3D&reserved=0>.
>
> To update or remove your account, log in at https://www.courts.wa.gov/notifications/?fa=notifications.updateaccount<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.courts.wa.gov%2Fnotifications%2F%3Ffa%3Dnotifications.updateaccount&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cfa489a30029644a771a808d94634784c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637618013436546545%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=AliE34BVBiD%2FuTNSuEM41iFTZrS94wNpOM%2Bq03DedRA%3D&reserved=0>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> This e-mail has been sent to everyone in the COADIVIIIPUBLISHEDOPINIONS at LISTSERV.COURTS.WA.GOV<mailto:COADIVIIIPUBLISHEDOPINIONS at LISTSERV.COURTS.WA.GOV> mailing list.  To reply to the sender, click Reply.  To reply to the sender and the mailing list, click Reply All.
>
> You can remove yourself from this mailing list at any time by sending a "SIGNOFF COADIVIIIPUBLISHEDOPINIONS" command to LISTSERV at LISTSERV.COURTS.WA.GOV<mailto:LISTSERV at LISTSERV.COURTS.WA.GOV>.
>
> This message mailed to cat at LOCCC.COM<mailto:cat at LOCCC.COM>
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmailman.fsr.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fwsbarp&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cfa489a30029644a771a808d94634784c%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637618013436556501%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=pvV39H2%2FTNo2adICOLMpYqHSKYsByMCLR7hifvVGd9w%3D&reserved=0>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210714/a824df92/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 21:42:14 +0000
> From: Craig Gourley <craig at glgmail.com>
> To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: [WSBARP] Aerial photos
> Message-ID:
>    <MW3PR12MB4362671EB5AE6F7E82364E79AE139 at MW3PR12MB4362.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Listmates, I know this has been discussed before but I can't locate the discussion. Other than the county what is a good source for old aerial photos?  Thanks, Craig
>
> GOURLEY LAW GROUP
> THE EXCHANGE CONNECTION
> SNOHOMISH ESCROW
> P.O. Box 1091
> Snohomish, WA 98291
> PH:  (360) 568-5065 (800) 291-8401
> Fax: (360) 568-8092
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may contain legally privileged, confidential information belonging to the sender. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action based on the contents of this electronic mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail in error, please contact sender and delete all copies.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210714/43d5d2f6/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 18:41:18 -0700
> From: <scott at scottgthomaslaw.com>
> To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Aerial photos
> Message-ID: <005101d7791a$82756040$876020c0$@scottgthomaslaw.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I seem to have saved several of those tips.
>
>
>
> From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> On Behalf Of Craig Gourley
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 2:42 PM
> To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> Subject: [WSBARP] Aerial photos
>
>
>
> Listmates, I know this has been discussed before but I can't locate the
> discussion. Other than the county what is a good source for old aerial
> photos?  Thanks, Craig
>
>
>
> GOURLEY LAW GROUP
>
> THE EXCHANGE CONNECTION
>
> SNOHOMISH ESCROW
>
> P.O. Box 1091
>
> Snohomish, WA 98291
>
> PH:  (360) 568-5065 (800) 291-8401
>
> Fax: (360) 568-8092
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may contain
> legally privileged, confidential information belonging to the sender. The
> information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named
> above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action based on the
> contents of this electronic mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this electronic mail in error, please contact sender and delete all
> copies.
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210714/b210b611/attachment.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210714/b210b611/ReWSBARPAerialPhotography3.htm>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210714/b210b611/ReWSBARPAerialPhotography4.htm>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210714/b210b611/ReWSBARPAerialPhotography.htm>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210714/b210b611/ReWSBARPAerialPhotography2.htm>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
> Name: Re WSBARP Aerial Photography4.txt
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210714/b210b611/ReWSBARPAerialPhotography4.txt>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210714/b210b611/ReWSBARPAerialpicturescirca19902.htm>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210714/b210b611/ReWSBARPAerialpicturescirca1990.htm>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: Sources of aerial photography.pdf
> Type: application/pdf
> Size: 642995 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210714/b210b611/Sourcesofaerialphotography.pdf>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
> End of WSBARP Digest, Vol 82, Issue 17
> **************************************

***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***

_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210715/4b5265e8/attachment.html>