[Vision2020] Fw: Mr. Paul's Discredited Campaign

Tue Jan 3 11:25:39 PST 2012

So you' re now suggesting that liberals are the only ones who suggest that Republicans are the only ones who break campaign promises? 

Boy did I miss pointing out how absurd some of this conservative claptrap is!

But don't worry. Unlike Keely I'm not really back. Just having some fun before school starts.

On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:19 AM, "Jay Borden" <jborden at datawedge.com> wrote:

> So… you’re now suggesting that Republicans are the only ones that break campaign promises? 
>  
> I’m sure that with the tiniest of digging, anyone can find scores of examples across the board… and throughout history…. of politicians that didn’t fulfill their assurances to the public while on the campaign trail.
>  
>  
> Jay
>  
> From: Tom Hansen [mailto:thansen at moscow.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:50 AM
> To: lfalen
> Cc: Jay Borden; Sunil Ramalingam; vision 2020
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw: Mr. Paul's Discredited Campaign
>  
> Roger Falen urges:
>  
> "If you make a campaign promise, keep it."
> 
> 
> Ya mean like like the promise, made by the GOP in November '10, of jobs, Jobs, JOBS under a new Republican-majority House of Representatives, Mr. Falen?
> 
> Seeya later, Moscow.
>  
> Tom Hansen
> Spokane, Washington
>  
> "If not us, who?
> If not now, when?"
>  
> - Unknown
> 
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:38 AM, lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com> wrote:
> 
> Nethercurt was a conservatism state legislator from spokane. He campaigned on term limits, saying that he would only run for one term. He then changed his mind  and ran for another term and was defeated. Rightly so. If you make a campaign promise, keep it. Helen Chenowith also campaigned on term liments. She quit when she said she would.
> Roger
> -----Original message-----
> From: "Jay Borden" jborden at datawedge.com
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:13:46 -0800
> To: "Sunil Ramalingam" sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw: Mr. Paul's Discredited Campaign
> 
> 
> No, I don't recall George Nethercutt.  (I Googled him to see if I could
> learn more... but nothing really stands out as far as his record).
>  
>  
>  
> Since (according to the interwebs) he was a Republican, I can only
> assume that he rubbed left-leaning folks the wrong way in his
> politics... perhaps under the guise of "term limits".
>  
>  
>  
> (If I'm missing something major (like he became infamous for driving the
> dodo bird to extinction or something), please send me more information
> before the public lambasting begins).   I only moved back here to Moscow
> in 2005 ... so anything local at the time surrounding him I probably
> missed.
>  
>  
>  
> Of course, the Achille's Heel in the "term limits" plan is that we would
> have to take a potential politician at their word...  I suppose my
> larger point was that if we truly want a government that represents the
> people, then we *all* should set aside whatever individual
> beliefs/agendas that we have and focus on that single issue:  that a
> representative cannot hold office for longer than X terms.  Congeal
> around THAT issue and get it done... and then we can return to our
> megaload riots and NASCAR races.
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Jay
>  
>  
>  
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
> [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf Of Sunil Ramalingam
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 2:02 PM
> Cc: vision 2020
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw: Mr. Paul's Discredited Campaign
>  
>  
>  
> Jay,
>  
> Remember George Nethercutt? He's a good reason not to apply your
> standard. I think we'd better know all their positions before voting
> them in because they say they're for term limits.
>  
> Sunil
>  
> ________________________________
>  
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:02:49 -0800
> From: jborden at datawedge.com
> To: godshatter at yahoo.com; deco at moscow.com
> CC: Vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw: Mr. Paul's Discredited Campaign
>  
> I've been a proponent of term limits for... well, forever.  We limit the
> number of terms for our President, we need to limit the terms in our
> House and Senate.   Having people in office for *decades* does nothing
> but consolidate power and invite corruption.
>  
>  
>  
> If you *truly* want representation in America, we have to rotate through
> our elected representatives... frequently.   
>  
>  
>  
> To do this, Americans are going to have to put aside all other opinions
> until this is achieved.  Environment?  Abortion?  Taxes?  Left-handed
> dentists?  All of these items need to be tabled, and the *one question*
> that needs to be asked of a candidate is "Will you introduce and vote
> for term limits?"  It needs to be the *only* reason to vote for a
> candidate, and until the goal is accomplished, it needs to be the
> *only*reason that a candidate is voted FOR.
>  
>  
>  
> THEN, when term limits come to fruition... when our elected
> representatives cannot stay in office and continue to consolidate power
> and control... then we can dust off our beliefs and take them to a
> government that is as elastic as the population it represents.
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Jay
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
> [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com] On Behalf Of Paul Rumelhart
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 9:47 AM
> To: Art Deco
> Cc: Vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw: Mr. Paul's Discredited Campaign
>  
>  
>  
>  
> If he does what I think he'll do if he gets into office, he'll veto
> anything that he finds to be unconstitutional.  This will, at the very
> least, help stop abuses like the Patriot Act and increases in funding
> for DHS.  Even if Congress can come up with enough votes to override the
> veto, issues like this will suddenly be at the forefront of the
> "national conversation" about what's going on in government.  For this
> alone, I'd like to see him get in there.
>  
> Paul
>  
> On 12/30/2011 09:29 AM, Art Deco wrote:
>  
> I agree with Rumelhart to the extent that things in this country [and
> globally] are broken beyond the traditional politicians' ways of
> repairing them.  We need bold, realistic, non-poll-driven leaders who
> can convince us to re-evaluate our situation, offer feasible solutions,
> and to convince us to make the inevitable selfless sacrifices necessary.
>  
>  
>  
> Though not traditional, I do not think Ron Paul is one of those leaders.
>  
>  
>  
> His view of the world and his positions are too simplistic for the
> complex, diverse, globally competitive world we live in.  The latest
> revelations have shown that his integrity does not rise above the
> minimum standard.  The simplicity of his views are his main attraction
> to many, but reality is the barricade to his views ever producing
> workable solutions -- they would be even more disastrous than the messes
> we now face.
>  
>  
>  
> In addition, some of his views are so abhorrent and/or crackpotty that
> he would not be likely to convince congress to implement them in the
> face of public opinion.
>  
>  
>  
> Having said that, I am unable to suggest any leader or group of leaders
> that seem capable of fixing things.  The best I can hope for is that we
> elect the lesser of the evils, at least by a little, to struggle on.
>  
>  
>  
> I'm glad I'm old and not likely to live too much longer.  I don't not
> want to see the result of where the world is heading and the foolishness
> of those in power resisting what needs to be done to change that
> direction.
>  
>  
>  
> w.
>  
>  
>  
> From: Sunil Ramalingam <mailto:sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
>  
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 7:54 AM
>  
> Cc: vision 2020 <mailto:vision2020 at moscow.com>  
>  
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw: Mr. Paul's Discredited Campaign
>  
>  
>  
> Why doesn't the NYT address Paul's stances on foreign policy? On defense
> spending?
>  
> Sunil
>  
> ________________________________
>  
> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:38:24 -0800
> From: godshatter at yahoo.com
> To: deco at moscow.com
> CC: Vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw: Mr. Paul's Discredited Campaign
>  
>  
> I'm beginning to believe that Ron Paul is our only hope to stop the
> downslope this country is on.  For example, the Transportation Security
> Administration just got an extra $7.85 billion in funding for 2012,
> including several hundred million dollars of funding for whole body
> imagers.  This passed both the House and the Senate.  Does anyone here
> actually believe that terrorism is a personally actionable danger?  Do
> you change your behavior at all due to the threat?  Do you think all the
> security theater is worth the money?
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20120103/e7318649/attachment-0001.html>