[Vision2020] Questions for you legal eagles
deco at moscow.com
Fri May 4 10:38:02 PDT 2007
1. Is the No Contact Order issued by the court prohibiting Sitwell from any contact with the victims and victim's family still in effect?
2. Although there is nothing any of us can do to effect what goes on in the cult, each of us has a small say when the various public officials involved in this poster case for how not to deal with a serial child molester next stand for election. I suspect there will be some vigorous debate on the issues engendered by the Sitler case. If the No Contact order is lifted or modified, I suspect there may be some immediate national publicity on the entire case.
3. Was the court aware of Sitler's trophy website of photos of children, some of whom were his alleged victims? Or was this information withheld from the court? Was this evidence in the possession of the LCSD at the time of sentencing and re-sentencing or did they miss this in their "investigation?"
4. Does it make sense for Prosecuting Attorney and the court to agree to the extremely light conditional sentence for Sitler given that they were presented a letter from the parents of one of Sitler's victims containing the following text?
"Steven has admitted to several incidents of sexual perversion. We personally only know of the full details of his molestation of our daughter, [XXX]. When she was only two years old, Steven offered to take her downstairs and watch her while the adults were taking upstairs. At that time he forced her to kiss his erect penis." http://www.tomandrodna.com/CR%5F2005%5F02027/Private_Letter.htm
5. I wonder how Doug Farris would feel about it if it was his two year old daughter who was defiled in the manner described above. Would Farris still be so anxious to kiss his cultmaster's ass by attempting to run clumsy interference to try to keep the most egregiously perverted details of Sitler's perverted behavior and the subsequent actions of the cultmaster to squelch information and minimize the effects of Sitler's and the cultmaster's own actions?
6. For those of you that have followed the month long series on child abuse and neglect in the Spokesman-Review, I am sure you recognize how horribly and unconscionably this entire case has been handled. I hope that such knowledge will not only inspire you to do more to protect children, but also to make efforts to see that such a miscarriage of justice never happens in Latah County again.
Wayne A. Fox
1009 Karen Lane
PO Box 9421
Moscow, ID 83843
waf at moscow.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "J Ford" <privatejf32 at hotmail.com>
To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Questions for you legal eagles
> Wilson specifically wrote and stated that Sitler would not be allowed in
> church where some of his victims still attend. Now, however, it looks like
> he will be going back even on this point. Just like he did with Jamin.
> What do you tell those victims when they see "the bad man that hurt" them
> sitting in the same pew as they are, watching them? How do you explain to
> the victims, some of which are still under the age of 5, that the "bad man"
> has "repented" (after over 100 victims) and should be forgiven and allowed
> in church? How do you explain to the victims that the "pastor" who was
> never educated in the pastoral arts, much less pedophilia treatment, will be
> the one "counseling" and monitoring this pervert that is now in amongst them
> on a regular basis? And just who will be watching the pervert when the
> "pastor" is up in front of the "church", and the pervert is sitting deeply
> in the audience? And just how is this perverts "pastor" going to monitor
> and maintain this pervert on a daily basis, securing the community and
> church that he and the "pastor" lied to for several months?
> Squirm all you want, Dougie-boy....you lied when this first came up, you
> lied after the story broke, you lied during your "home-town meeting" last
> fall and you are lying to us now. More importantly, you are lying to those
> children who are supposed to be able to look towards the adults in their
> lives to keep them safe.
> Its getting hard to tell who is worse - the pervert or his
> J :]
>>From: "Glenn Schwaller" <vpschwaller at gmail.com>
>>To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>>Subject: [Vision2020] Questions for you legal eagles
>>Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 14:06:10 -0700
>>Well like most legal issues, the answer is "It depends". Strictly
>>if (s)he resides in Idaho, (s)he registers in Idaho; residence in
>>requires registration in Washington. It depends on what Probation and
>>Parole have to say about where this person can live, work, and visit.
>>Depending on the nature of the crime and the person involved, (s)he may not
>>be able to leave the jurisdiction, period. I know of a case in which the
>>offender owns property in rural Latah county, but may not be able to live
>>that property because it is outside of the city limits. Other cases may
>>allow the offender live in Moscow, but work in Pullman, requiring a travel
>>permit to go outside of the state. This would most likely require them to
>>call their probation officer when they leave the state and when they
>>return. They may be given very strict limits on where they can go, or time
>>limits on how long they can spend going from home to the workplace.
>>Attending church, or going shopping will likely require having an approved
>>chaperone accompany them if they are going to be in places that may be "at
>>risk" (lots of definitions on what that means - questions? Just ask).
>>A specific case in point got yer curiousity aroused?
>> List services made available by First Step Internet,
>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> Exercise your brain! Try Flexicon.
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Vision2020