<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV>1. Is the No Contact Order issued by the court
prohibiting Sitwell from any contact with the victims and victim's family still
in effect?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>2. Although there is nothing any of us can do to effect
what goes on in the cult, each of us has a small say when the various public
officials involved in this poster case for how not to deal with a serial child
molester next stand for election. I suspect there will be some vigorous
debate on the issues engendered by the Sitler case. If the No Contact
order is lifted or modified, I suspect there may be some immediate national
publicity on the entire case.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>3. Was the court aware of Sitler's trophy website of
photos of children, some of whom were his alleged victims? Or was this
information withheld from the court? Was this evidence in the possession
of the LCSD at the time of sentencing and re-sentencing or did they miss this in
their "investigation?"</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>4. Does it make sense for Prosecuting Attorney and the
court to agree to the extremely light conditional sentence for Sitler given that
they were presented a letter from the parents of one of Sitler's victims
containing the following text?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT color=#ff0000>"Steven has admitted to several
incidents of sexual perversion. We personally only know of the full
details of his molestation of our daughter, [XXX]. When she was only two
years old, Steven offered to take her downstairs and watch her while the adults
were taking upstairs. At that time he forced her to kiss his erect
penis."</FONT> <A
href="http://www.tomandrodna.com/CR%5F2005%5F02027/Private_Letter.htm">http://www.tomandrodna.com/CR%5F2005%5F02027/Private_Letter.htm</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>5. I wonder how Doug Farris would feel about it if it was
his two year old daughter who was defiled in the manner described above.
Would Farris still be so anxious to kiss his cultmaster's ass by attempting
to run clumsy interference to try to keep the most egregiously perverted details
of Sitler's perverted behavior and the subsequent actions of the
cultmaster to squelch information and minimize the effects of Sitler's
and the cultmaster's own actions?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>6. For those of you that have followed the month long
series on child abuse and neglect in the <EM>Spokesman-Review</EM>, I am sure
you recognize how horribly and unconscionably this entire case has been
handled. I hope that such knowledge will not only inspire you to do more
to protect children, but also to make efforts to see that such a miscarriage of
justice never happens in Latah County again.</DIV>
<DIV><BR>Wayne A. Fox<BR>1009 Karen Lane<BR>PO Box 9421<BR>Moscow, ID
83843</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>(208) 882-7975<BR><A href="mailto:waf@moscow.com">waf@moscow.com</A></DIV>
<DIV><BR> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message -----
<DIV>From: "J Ford" <<A
href="mailto:privatejf32@hotmail.com">privatejf32@hotmail.com</A>></DIV>
<DIV>To: <<A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A>></DIV>
<DIV>Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 10:23 PM</DIV>
<DIV>Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Questions for you legal eagles</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>> Wilson specifically wrote and stated that Sitler would not
be allowed in <BR>> church where some of his victims still attend. Now,
however, it looks like <BR>> he will be going back even on this point.
Just like he did with Jamin.<BR>> <BR>> What do you tell those victims
when they see "the bad man that hurt" them <BR>> sitting in the same pew as
they are, watching them? How do you explain to <BR>> the victims, some
of which are still under the age of 5, that the "bad man" <BR>> has
"repented" (after over 100 victims) and should be forgiven and allowed <BR>>
in church? How do you explain to the victims that the "pastor" who was
<BR>> never educated in the pastoral arts, much less pedophilia treatment,
will be <BR>> the one "counseling" and monitoring this pervert that is now in
amongst them <BR>> on a regular basis? And just who will be watching
the pervert when the <BR>> "pastor" is up in front of the "church", and the
pervert is sitting deeply <BR>> in the audience? And just how is this
perverts "pastor" going to monitor <BR>> and maintain this pervert on a daily
basis, securing the community and <BR>> church that he and the "pastor" lied
to for several months?<BR>> <BR>> Squirm all you want, Dougie-boy....you
lied when this first came up, you <BR>> lied after the story broke, you lied
during your "home-town meeting" last <BR>> fall and you are lying to us
now. More importantly, you are lying to those <BR>> children who are
supposed to be able to look towards the adults in their <BR>> lives to keep
them safe.<BR>> <BR>> Its getting hard to tell who is worse - the pervert
or his <BR>> guard-dog-that-isn't?<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> J
:]<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>>>From: "Glenn
Schwaller" <<A
href="mailto:vpschwaller@gmail.com">vpschwaller@gmail.com</A>><BR>>>To:
<A
href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com">vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>>>Subject:
[Vision2020] Questions for you legal eagles<BR>>>Date: Thu, 3 May 2007
14:06:10 -0700<BR>>><BR>>>Well like most legal issues, the answer is
"It depends". Strictly <BR>>>speaking,<BR>>>if (s)he resides
in Idaho, (s)he registers in Idaho; residence in
<BR>>>Washington<BR>>>requires registration in Washington. It
depends on what Probation and<BR>>>Parole have to say about where this
person can live, work, and visit.<BR>>>Depending on the nature of the
crime and the person involved, (s)he may not<BR>>>be able to leave the
jurisdiction, period. I know of a case in which the<BR>>>offender
owns property in rural Latah county, but may not be able to live
<BR>>>on<BR>>>that property because it is outside of the city
limits. Other cases may<BR>>>allow the offender live in Moscow, but
work in Pullman, requiring a travel<BR>>>permit to go outside of the
state. This would most likely require them to<BR>>>call their
probation officer when they leave the state and when
they<BR>>>return. They may be given very strict limits on where they
can go, or time<BR>>>limits on how long they can spend going from home to
the workplace.<BR>>>Attending church, or going shopping will likely
require having an approved<BR>>>chaperone accompany them if they are going
to be in places that may be "at<BR>>>risk" (lots of definitions on what
that means - questions? Just ask).<BR>>><BR>>>A specific case
in point got yer curiousity aroused?<BR>>><BR>>>Schwaller<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>>=======================================================<BR>>>
List services made available by First Step Internet,<BR>>> serving
the communities of the Palouse since
1994.<BR>>>
<A
href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A><BR>>>
<A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>>>=======================================================<BR>>
<BR>>
_________________________________________________________________<BR>>
Exercise your brain! Try Flexicon. <BR>> <A
href="http://games.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_hmemailtaglineapril07">http://games.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_hmemailtaglineapril07</A><BR>>
<BR>>
=======================================================<BR>> List
services made available by First Step Internet, <BR>> serving the
communities of the Palouse since 1994.
<BR>>
<A
href="http://www.fsr.net">http://www.fsr.net</A>
<BR>> <A
href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com</A><BR>>
=======================================================<BR>></BODY></HTML>