[Vision2020] Dale has a backbone? & George W. Vader?

Steven Simmons lowman at lowbatteries.com
Thu May 26 20:55:10 PDT 2005


I think you have to worry when you make a movie about a stereotypically 
deceitful, evil emperor destroying an age-old republic and establishing 
military rule, and people think you are insulting their president.

Just a thought.

Steven Simmons


tbertruss at aol.com wrote:

>  
> Joan et. al.
>  
> I ignored Dale's blog for a long time thinking to even respond to some 
> of the crap there not worth it.  But his web site keeps coming up on 
> V2020 as a topic of discussion.
>  
> There has been some controversy about the new Star Wars movie 
> regarding what some think is thinly veiled political jabs at the Bush 
> administration.  Lucas denies this was his intention. 
>  
> George W. Vader?
>  
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20050522/ts_alt_afp/afpentertainmentfilm_050522202005
>  
> Ted Moffett
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joan Opyr <joanopyr at earthlink.net>
> To: Vision2020 Moscow <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Sent: Thu, 26 May 2005 15:11:14 -0700
> Subject: [Vision2020] Dale has a backbone? Where? Is that it wiggling 
> in the Rosauer's fish counter?
>
> Hello Ted, 
>  
> First, I read the article you posted on election fraud, Ted -- the one 
> Dale took as evidence of your paranoia. I, too, had hoped that it 
> would stimulate discussion, but I didn't start the ball rolling 
> because I quite simply found the facts too grim. I'm no political 
> ostrich, as most here will attest, but good grief -- our last two 
> presidential elections have been profoundly depressing for the 
> democrats (note the small "d") among us. This will mark me forever as 
> a geek, but there's a line in the new Star Wars movie that just about 
> sums it up: Padme, watching the galactic republic devolve into a 
> monarchy under the cover of endless war, remarks something along the 
> lines of "Thus dies Liberty, to a thunderous applause." 
>  
> Dale is disingenuous. He'! s manipulative. He's unprofessional, 
> discourteous, he is shallow and a wimp. Yes, a wimp. Despite his 
> claims to have acquired a backbone in the Navy, Dale chooses to 
> "debate" us not on Vision 2020, among the elbowing, jostling 
> hoi-polloi, but from the safe distance of his self-moderated weblog. 
> There, Dale sets the agenda and controls the discourse. He's never in 
> danger of having his ass handed to him on a plate, as are the active 
> participants of Vision 2020, myself included. This danger of being 
> shown up, of being corrected, of having to admit to being wrong, or 
> losing an argument, or making a mistake is the reason why Doug Wilson 
> and Doug Jones, et al., left us in late 2003, the Winter of Their 
> Discontent. They found that they were losing too many arguments making 
> too few converts. Vision 2020 was not good hunting ground for 
> lock-step thinkers. 
>  
> If! you'll all excuse my language, Dale is a classic chickenshit. He 
> nitpicks from a safe distance, tossing little bits of gravel at the 
> big boys and girls. It's clear that he reads 2020 religiously, and 
> then posts like mad about what he encounters here, but he does this in 
> the guise of the tattle-tale tit. Dale nitpicks and runs away, living 
> to pick another day. Backbone my fanny. Dale snatched a tentacle off a 
> passing jellyfish and stuffed that wiggling length of slime down where 
> his vertebrae ought to be. 
>  
> For all his faults (and they are many), Donovan, Dale's designated Roy 
> Cohn, remains on Vision 2020. He fawns all over Dale on right-mind.us 
> (have you considered a good tongue-scraping, Donovan? preferably with 
> bleach?) but he hasn't run away or hidden his ignorant belligerence 
> behind Mama Courtney's skirts.&nbs! p;
>  
> Which isn't to say that I read Donovan's posts -- 15 per day and 
> counting -- because I don't. I have other hobbies, like breathing. 
>  
> Joan Opyr/Auntie Establishment 
> www.joanopyr.com <http://www.joanopyr.com> 
>  
>  
> On May 26, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Tbertruss at aol.com 
> <mailto:Tbertruss%40aol.com> wrote: 
>  
> > 
> > Hello Julie: 
> > 
> > Anyone on the web can go to: 
> > 
> > http://vision2020.moscow.com 
> > 
> > and see the archives of Vision2020 which should have every 
> Vision2020 > post for years back accessible. 
> > 
> > Here are the first two hits from a simple Google web search using my 
> > name "ted moffett"& nbsp;
> > 
> > Ted Moffett on Pacifism 
> > ... Ted Moffett on Pacifism. Ted Moffett writes:. What amazes me, 
> has > always amazed 
> > me, since I was a teeny tiny person, is how this moral directive is 
> > so ... 
> > right-mind.us/archive/2004/11/04/560.aspx - 43k - Cached - > 
> Similar pages 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Ted Moffett's Paranoia 
> > ... Ted Moffett's Paranoia. Ted Moffet posted an article called “I > 
> smell a Rat”. 
> > Ted, how do you reply to Anne Applebaum's post about having faith in 
> > ATMs, ...&nb! sp;
> > right-mind.us/archive/2004/11/17/678.aspx - 42k - Cached - > 
> Similar pages 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > As you can see, both of these hits are from Dale's web site where he 
> > used Vision2020 posts I authored to create or attempt to create > 
> discussion on his site. 
> > 
> > I can only conclude Dale is desperate to draw others to his site, so 
> > he must steal controversy, as it were, from Vision2020. 
> > 
> > Below is a forwarded Vision2020 post I sent recently about Dale > 
> Courtney's web site that generated zero comments on the Vision2020 > 
> list. 
> > 
> > Subj: [Vision2020] Dale Courtney's Oversimplifications  
> > Date: 5/21/2005 9:48:21 PM Pacific Daylight Time 
> > From: Tbertruss at aol.com <mailto:Tbertruss%40aol.com> 
> > To: dmcourtn at moscow.com <mailto:dmcourtn%40moscow.com>, 
> vision2020 at moscow.com <mailto:vision2020%40moscow.com> 
> > Sent from the Internet (Details) 
> > 
> > Mr. Dale Courtney et. al. 
> > 
> > Shortly after last fall's presidential election, I posted to V2020 
> an > article about the possibility of voting fraud and/or tampering.  
> I > consider this a nonpartisan issue that anyone who cares in the > 
> slightest bit about the integrity of the electoral process would wish 
> > to see explored and exposed.  I merely posted the article, without > 
> writing any text, just signing my name. 
> > 
> > So how does Dale Courtney respond?  He places on his web site a post 
> > in bold font announcing "Ted Moffett's Paranoia," suggesting that I 
> > respond to another article about computer systems and paper trails. 
>> 
>> Regardless of the facts and arguments on the issue of computerized > 
> voting, what kind of morality is behind placing on a public web site a 
> > derogatory statement about the psychology of someone you don't know 
> > who was merely making information available about a critical issue?  
> > If Dale did not post the statement in question, perhaps he needs to 
> > moderate the content on his website?  But my best guess is that this 
> > statement was authored by him. 
>> 
>> When I first discovered this juvenile and rude conduct on his web > 
> site, I decided to ignore it. 
>> 
>> But today I found more nonsense on Mr. Courtney's web site.  > 
> Apparently, he feels a need to lump together under the words "left! " 
> > and/or "lefty" a large group of people with widely varying view s on 
> > government.  Dale wrote in answer to a Joan Opry V2020 post: 
>> 
>> "First, I'm not Faul, or Stigmatta, or Fiat, or... That's not me. No 
> > need. I don't play "hide-and-seek" games. I sign everything that's > 
> mine. 20 years in the navy teaches one to have a backbone/spine. So > 
> don't assign the methods of the Left (Ivan Brewski, Art Deco, JeanC, > 
> Captain Kirker, R2 Privacy, Shelly, Tbertruss, DPQ, hayfields, LRR, > 
> Nebar, Wocsom, ! etc) onto someone who behaves right (pun intended). 
> Go > look somewhere else for your bogeymen. 
>> 
>> As I said previously, I do find it the height of hypocrisy that the > 
> Left doesn't get bent out of shape when Lefties are anonymous. But let 
> > someone they don't agree with try and be anonymous? Ah! The > 
> intolerance of the Tolerant. I've come to expect nothing less." 
>> 
>> First off, Mr. Courtney, you need to follow the V2020 list more > 
> closely if you are going to assume all those on the "left" are one > 
> group that marches in lock step.  Tom Hansen, no doubt in your mind > 
> one of those nefarious members of the "left," once chided on V2020 > 
> yours truly for not signing a V2020 post.  So in fact on V2020 a > 
> "lefty" chided a fellow "lefty" (this designa! tion is only in Mr. > 
> Courtney's mind, because I do not describe myself as a "lefty" or a > 
> member of the "left") for not signing a V2020 post.  I argued once on 
> > V2020 that perhaps not signing a V2020 post with a "real" name can 
> in > some cases be justified.  Bill London, another individual I 
> suspect > you would label "leftist," argued otherwise.   
>> 
>> I have occasionally not signed a V2020 post when using my AOL e-mail 
> > address "tbertruss," but I nearly always do.  I am not trying to 
> hide > behind "tbertruss."  Everyone who follows V2020 knows that "Art 
> Deco" > is Wayne Fox, and "Nebar" is Jasper Nance.  The V2020 posts by 
> these > individuals do not represent a deliberate attempt to hide 
> their > identity, as Dale Courtney implied. 
>> 
>> "Faul," "Sigmatta" and "Fiat" were attempting to hide their > 
> identities from the V2020 list, as far as I know. 
>> 
>> Who is looking for "bogeymen," as Dale Courtney wrote in response to 
> > Joan Opry?  It seems Dale Courtney's stereotyping oversimplifying > 
> views of this large and varied group of individuals he regards as > 
> being members of the "left" qualify these "Lefty's" as his own > 
> "bogeymen." 
>> 
>> Perhaps Mr. Courtney is so enamored of marching in lock step > 
> utilizing a form of "group think" that he projects this manner of > 
> thinking onto those he imagines oppose him. 
>> 
>> I will let the immortal words of Dale Courtney written to Joan Opry > 
> on Mr. Courtney's web site express what I think about his statement > 
> "Ted Moffett's Paranoia:"  
>> 
>> "So instead of trying to project your bias and venom on someone you > 
> don't know, why don't you go do something useful." 
>> 
>> Links to the info on Dale Courtney's web site mentioned above: 
>> 
>> http://right-mind.us/archive/2004/11/17/678.aspx 
>> 
>> http://right-mind.us/archive/2005/01/27/1375.aspx ! ;
>> 
>> http://right-mind.us/archive/2005/01/27/1377.aspx 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------- 
>> 
>> V2020 Post by Ted Moffett 
>> _____________________________________________________ 
>> List services made available by First Step Internet, 
>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
>> lank> 
>> <http://www.fsr.net>mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com 
> <mailto:Vision2020%40moscow.com> 
>> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ 
>> 
> Joan Opyr/Auntie Establishment 
> ! www.joanopyr.com <http://www.joanopyr.com>&n bsp;
>
>_____________________________________________________
> List services made available by First Step Internet, 
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
>               http://www.fsr.net                       
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com <mailto:Vision2020%40moscow.com>
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_____________________________________________________
> List services made available by First Step Internet, 
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
>               http://www.fsr.net                       
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20050526/ea25b1c7/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list