[WSBARP] House Constructed Over Lot Line

John McCrady j.mccrady at pstitle.com
Fri Aug 19 14:16:37 PDT 2022


What I have done in similar circumstances is to create the easement and record it while the properties are in unified ownership.  Then when one of the parcels sells the grantor reserves the easement in their deed, or excepts it from the covenants of warranty.
I would like to hear any contrary viewpoints though.


John McCrady
Counsel
Puget Sound Title Company
5350 Orchard Street West
University Place WA 98467
253-476-5721
j.mccrady at pstitle.com



Beginning July 26, 2021, recording fees for most documents recorded in Washington will increase by $100. Please be sure to collect recording fees accordingly. Due to the above increase, our Reconveyance fees will also be increased by $100.00

WARNING-FRAUDULENT FUNDING INSTRUCTIONS 
Email hacking and fraud are on the rise to fraudulently misdirect funds.  Please call your escrow officer immediately using contact information found from an independent source, such as the sales contract or internet, to verify any funding instructions received.  We are not responsible for any wire sent by you to an incorrect bank account.


-----Original Message-----
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of David
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2022 12:59 PM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: [WSBARP] House Constructed Over Lot Line

Listmates—a few days ago there was a post about an property owner who owned three contiguous lots who built his house on Lot B that extended 10 feet into Lot C. The consensus of how to deal with that issue was for the owner to grant an easement on Lot C for the benefit of Lot B. That was my thought as well. 
Later, I recalled something for Stoebuck’s Washington Practice where he states that an easement appurtenant “implies at least two parcels of land…and these parcels must be in separate ownership; one person who owns two separate parcels of land cannot have an easement across one that serves the other.” He cites a 1918 case.102 Washi. 608, 173 P. 508.
Is the solution to clearly make the easement “in gross” or has there been a case that reverses the 1918 result?




***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***

_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp







More information about the WSBARP mailing list