[WSBARP] Easement for property in different county

Douglas Scott doug at rainieradvocates.com
Fri Jun 11 15:51:53 PDT 2021


The dominant estate property's future assignees or purchasers should also
be on notice that they have easement rights.

*DOUGLAS W. SCOTT*
Rainier Legal Advocates|LLC

465 Rainier Blvd. N., Suite C
Issaquah, Washington 98027
425.392.8550 (tel)
425.392.2829 (fax)



www.rainieradvocates.com


Notice: This communication, including attachments, may contain information
that is confidential and protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges. It constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed
only to the designated recipient(s). If the reader or recipient of this
communication is not the intended recipient, an employee or agent of the
intended recipient who is responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, or you believe that you have received this communication in
error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and promptly
delete this e-mail, including attachments without reading or saving them in
any manner. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution, or
reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may
be unlawful. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not
a waiver of any attorney/client or other privilege


On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 3:37 PM Kary Krismer <Krismer at comcast.net> wrote:

> Not that I see any harm in two documents recorded in two counties, but . .
> .
>
> 1.  Maybe someone could explain to me why you would need to record in both
> counties, as opposed to just the county with the servient estate--the one
> with property burdened by the easement.  This isn't like a deed of trust
> with property in multiple counties.  Recording is notice to third parties
> and I'm not seeing what recording an easement does in the county of the
> benefited estate.
>
> 2.   In answer your question the only time I've seen a document recorded
> in two counties is where a deed was accidentally recorded in the wrong
> county.   I don't think they created a new deed to fix the error, but that
> was years ago and I wasn't part of that process.  Would the recorder reject
> a document if there wasn't enough space for their stamping?
>
> Kary L. Krismer
> 206 723-2148
>
> On 6/11/2021 1:44 PM, Jeff at bellanddavispllc.com wrote:
>
> Listmates,
>
>
>
> Client’s property is in Clallam County.  Neighbor, whose land is in
> Jefferson County, is granting an easement to Client for a long standing
> encroaching septic drain field.  This may be rhetorical; but I assume I
> need two, identical, easement agreements signed, with one recorded in
> Clallam County and the other in Jefferson County.  Has anyone recorded the
> same document with two different county auditors?
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> *W. Jeff Davis*
>
> *BELL & DAVIS PLLC*
> P.O. Box 510
>
> 720 E. Washington Street, Suite 105
> Sequim WA 98382
> Phone: (360) 683.1129
> Fax: (360) 683.1258
> email: jeff at bellanddavispllc.com
> www.bellanddavispllc.com
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged,
> confidential, and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended
> recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly
> prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in
> error, please e-mail the sender at info at bellanddavispllc.com  or call
> 360.683.1129.
>
>
>
>
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing listWSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.comhttp://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
> others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210611/f592b2ae/attachment.html>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list