[WSBARP] Who signs a corrected quit claim deed?

[nestor at pplsweb.com]

Thanks for the analysis.

 

I personally have taken the strict position based on the other jurisdiction
I am licensed in, that once a document has been signed and notarized, the
document cannot be changed or altered in any manner. Minor alterations or
changes need to be initialed, resigned, notarized and the document recorded.

 

Typically I request a new document titled "Corrective ."  and refer to the
original recorded document.

 

 

Nestor Gorfinkel, Attorney at Law

Licensed in Washington & Florida

Florida Civil-Law (International) Notary

 

ATTENTION - This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message
may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are
not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard
copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return
e-mail or by telephone at the phone numbers provided herein and delete this
message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded
message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of
this message or any attachments may not have been produced by the sender.

 

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 

 

 

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
On Behalf Of Bickel, Dwight
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 10:31 AM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Who signs a corrected quit claim deed?

 

Kary - You are wise. The "scrivener's error" theory that a document can be
changed without requiring a signature (or initial) of the grantor PLUS a new
acknowledgement is very, very limited.  It has to be a patent error, which
means you can see from the erroneous document that there was an error.  It
has to be in the legal chain of title without the correction. 

 

A "typographical error of the legal description" can be a scrivener's error
that can be corrected by a new corrected recording that is done by the title
company. An obvious misspelling of words is clearly a scrivenor's error,
which probably does not need correcting at all.  A call to go "12.7 feet to
a pint on the Wset lin of the secshun" is an example. 

 

However, a mistaken lot number is also a typographical error [lot 4 was
intended but Lot 40 is on the deed]. Often that cannot be corrected without
a grantor signature and acknowledgement. Lot 40 of a 4-lot short plat is a
patent error. But if there is both a lot 4 and 40, then the error is not
patent. If the grantor also owns Lot 40, then the mistake is latent and not
a scrivener's error that can be done without a new grantor signature and
acknowledgement. There is no indication on the incorrect document that Lot
40 is an error.

 

A typo to the grantee's spelling of the name is an easy and clear
scrivener's error. But a significant error on the grantor's spelling means
that the deed is not in the legal chain of title. Our chain of title is
based on a grantor-grantee name search.  A deed from Schmitz is not in the
chain of title from Schmidt. 

 

A typo on the name of the subdivision can be a scrivener's error if there is
no other plat of that name.  A call in a legal description to go 1.27' feet
to a point on the west line of the subdivision is a scrivener's error if it
is 12.7' feet to that point. But a call in a legal description to go East
instead of West probably puts that outside the chain of title. Clearly not
possible if the grantor owns the mistaken land too. 

 

Too many people think that a new recording can done of an altered deed
without a new acknowledgment. Even if a title company uses the scrivener's
error theory and insures validity, a wise and appropriately conservative
real property lawyer might want a new document with a new grantor signature
and acknowledgement. Getting the document recorded does not mean it is in
the legal chain of title. Getting the document recorded does not ensure it
will withstand a Statute of Frauds challenge.

 

 

  _____  

NOTICE: The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of
this communication, you are hereby notified to: (i) delete the message and
all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any
manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20181008/6c175132/attachment.html>