[WSBARP] Commercial Lease Violations

[Maxwell Glasson]

Scott,

Pretty sure, given there is no "incurable" provision, that you would still
have to serve a 10 day cure notice under 59.12.030(4) prior to filing the
summons/complaint.

Regards,

*Maxwell B. Glasson, Esq.*
*Georgetown Legal*
*Post Office Box 80501 | Seattle, WA 98108*
*206.905.7810* |fx *206.259.2722* |* Max at GeorgetownLegalSeattle.com*


THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY BE
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED. THE INFORMATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF
THE INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM OR THE ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED. IF YOU ARE
NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR
DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY
USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY
NOTIFY US AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE.

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Scott Hildebrand <
scott at starboard-strategies.com> wrote:

> Gurus-
>
>
>
> I have a client whose tenant has violated the lease on several occasions.
> The tenant has been served two 10 day notices for non-compliance. The lease
> does not have an “incurable” provision for failing to comply, but it does
> define default in such a way that the tenant appears to be in default.
> Since the action would be under 59.12 and not 59.18, are other preliminary
> notices required, or can I just file a summons and complaint alleging
> default on the lease?
>
>
>
> I do a lot of residential evictions, not so many commercial…
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott Hildebrand
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180223/25a5c85c/attachment.html>