[WSBARP] Single Quitclaim?

[Jim Doran]

I concur and I must have been hearing the Auditor's voice in my head.  As
long as it is one transaction it will be fine.

James R. Doran
Attorney at Law
100 E. Pine Street -  Suite 205
Bellingham, WA 98225
(360)393-9506
jim at doranlegal.com
www.doranlegal.com

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Josh Grant <jgrant at accima.com> wrote:

> I agree with Jeanne., I regularly put numerous parcels on one deed. I am
> thinking of an estate which had dozens of parcels on one deed. Why do more
> than one deed?
>
> Joshua F. Grant, PS
> Attorney at Law
> P. O. Box 619
> Wilbur, WA 99185
> tel 509 647 5578
> fax 509 647 2734
>
> *From:* Jeanne Dawes <jjdawes at goregrewe.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 03, 2016 3:49 PM
> *To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [WSBARP] Single Quitclaim?
>
>
> I realize different counties do things differently, but I do not believe
> the statute would allow them to charge double just because there are two
> different legal descriptions in the document.  I routinely will include
> more than one piece of noncontiguous property in a single deed, and have
> not had any issues when recording in Spokane County.
>
>
>
> *Jeanne*
>
>
>
> *Jeanne J.* *Dawes*
>
> Attorney at Law
>
> Gore & Grewe, P.S.
>
> 103 E. Indiana Avenue, Suite A
>
> Spokane, WA 99207-2317
>
> Voice:  509-326-7500
>
> Fax:      509-326-7503
>
> jjdawes at goregrewe.com
>
> INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL TRANSMISSION IS PRIVILEGED AND
> CONFIDENTIAL.
>
>
>
> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:
> wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] *On Behalf Of *Jim Doran
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 03, 2016 3:08 PM
> *To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [WSBARP] Single Quitclaim?
>
>
>
> Funny.  We just heard a presentation by the Whatcom County Auditor.  She
> was very clear that they will charge you for two filings in this
> situation.  It would also keep the records clearer if you filed two deeds.
>
> She,of course, blames the State Legislator for all these fees and
> demands.
>
>
> James R. Doran
>
> Attorney at Law
>
> 100 E. Pine Street -  Suite 205
>
> Bellingham, WA 98225
> (360)393-9506
>
> jim at doranlegal.com
>
> www.doranlegal.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:17 PM, David Faber <david at faberfeinson.com>
> wrote:
>
> A client has two parcels of non-contiguous real property, both of which
> are to be quitclaimed into an LLC with my client as the sole member. Is
> there a reason why I wouldn't use a single quitclaim deed to transfer both
> parcels?
>
>
> Best,
>
> David J. Faber
>
> Faber Feinson PLLC
>
> 210 Polk Street, Suite 1
>
> Port Townsend, WA 98368
> (360) 379-4110 <%28360%29%20379-4110>
>
>
>
> *** NOTICE: ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION - PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL.
> This communication may contain privileged or other confidential
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you
> have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy,
> retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also, please
> indicate to the sender that you have received this communication in error,
> and destroy the copy you received.***
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20160303/23d2692b/attachment.html>