[WSBAPT] "Washington Convention" -- validity of Washington Will for property in Canada

Paul pneumiller at hotmail.com
Tue Sep 13 12:42:27 PDT 2016


A quick read of the convention indicates that the adopting jurisdiction needs to appoint an “authorized person” to bless the Will.  If WA hasn’t adopted the convention, then WA hasn’t appointed an “authorized person” so how can you fulfill the requirements of an “International Will” if your jurisdiction doesn’t have an “authorized person” for your WA Will?


From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Sharon Rutberg
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:47 AM
To: 'WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv' <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] "Washington Convention" -- validity of Washington Will for property in Canada

I believe you’re right. The U.S. Senate has ratified it, and some states have adopted it, but not Washington. I’m wondering, though, whether it might be useful to include the requirements if the testator owns property in an country/province that has adopted it.

Law Office of Sharon C. Rutberg, PS
1734 NW Market St.
Seattle, WA 98107
Website: www.sharonrutberglaw.com<http://www.sharonrutberglaw.com/>
206-409-2604
email at sharonrutberglaw.com<mailto:email at sharonrutberglaw.com>
Washington State Bar #47055
D.C. Bar #420576

NOTICES
The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, and/or other applicable protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message. Thank you for your assistance.

IRS Circular 230 Disclaimer: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that to the extent this communication contains advice relating to a Federal tax issue, it is not intended or written to be used, and it may not be used, for (i) the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed on you or any other person or entity under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting or marketing to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Katherine Gamble
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 10:56 AM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] "Washington Convention" -- validity of Washington Will for property in Canada

The last time I checked Washington state had not adopted it.

On Tuesday, September 13, 2016, Sharon Rutberg <email at sharonrutberglaw.com<mailto:email at sharonrutberglaw.com>> wrote:
I have also been looking into what is needed for a U.S. will to be admitted to probate in Canada for purposes of transferring property located there. The Washington Convention on international wills (http://www.unidroit.org/instruments/succession) sets out certain requirements for “international wills.” It appears that Canada has signed the convention and that some of its provinces have adopted it – including British Columbia. Kokie, have you come across this? (It does not appear that Quebec province has adopted the convention, and my client’s property is located there, so I’m still wondering what to do in my case.)

Sharon

Law Office of Sharon C. Rutberg, PS
1734 NW Market St.
Seattle, WA 98107
Website: www.sharonrutberglaw.com<http://www.sharonrutberglaw.com/>
206-409-2604
email at sharonrutberglaw.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','email at sharonrutberglaw.com');>
Washington State Bar #47055
D.C. Bar #420576

NOTICES
The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, and/or other applicable protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the message. Thank you for your assistance.

IRS Circular 230 Disclaimer: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that to the extent this communication contains advice relating to a Federal tax issue, it is not intended or written to be used, and it may not be used, for (i) the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed on you or any other person or entity under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting or marketing to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com');> [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com');>] On Behalf Of Kokie Adams
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 4:11 PM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] validity of Washington Will for BC property

I have successfully transferred a Whistler condo from an Estate to a purchaser – the Condo was part of the residuary estate so it was sold rather than transferred to an heir. I hired a BC lawyer and they told me what they needed (Letters Testamentary, etc.) and they handled all the BC paperwork.

Kokie Adams
[Adams-Logo-Print-300dpi-900wide]

Office:  425.774.0444 | Fax: 425.771.2711
kokie at adamslawgroupnw.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','kokie at adamslawgroupnw.com');>
www.adamslawgroupnw.com<http://www.adamslawgroupnw.com/>




From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com');> [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com');>] On Behalf Of Kate Gamble
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 1:37 PM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com');>>
Subject: [WSBAPT] validity of Washington Will for BC property

Can a Washington will validly dispose of real property located in British Columbia without the need for a separate Washington domiciliary will and a BC supplemental will?  It appears that the BC Wills, Estates & Succession Act allows for the foreign will to be “resealed” for ancillary probate in BC, and that all US states are “prescribed jurisdictions” that can have their grants of letters resealed in the BC courts.  Other than specifically describing the BC real property in a specific bequest, are there any other requirements in order for the Washington will to be recognized by the BC probate court?

Thanks in advance for your shared wisdom!


Kate Gamble

Attorney at Law

Uptown Law PLLC

PO Box 835

Port Townsend, WA 98368

(360) 379-1818




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, including any  attachments, is confidential and subject to legal privilege.  The information contained in this message is intended only for the use of the above named recipient.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, disclosure, or copying of this communication, including all attachments, is strictly prohibited, and subject to penalty.  If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return email and telephone at 360-379-1818; then please destroy this original message and all attachments.  Thank you.



SPECIAL NOTICE TO CLIENT(S): If you are a client and this email is directed to you, DO NOT FORWARD to any other party, or you could be waiving the attorney -client privilege

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20160913/0ed32237/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2906 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20160913/0ed32237/image004.jpg>


More information about the WSBAPT mailing list