[WSBAPT] Lapsed bequest - Per Capita Question

Carl L. Gay clgay at tfon.com
Thu Sep 15 13:52:00 PDT 2016


I have not read all the responses to Mr. Dolan’s query but merely understand there may be some confusion regarding application of the “per capita” language.  Our firm’s wills and trusts typically use, in place of “per stirpes” (traditional language of representation), the term “per capita at each generation”, as that term is discussed in the commentary to the Uniform Probate Code (Sections 2-103 and 2-106).  Perhaps the lawyer who drafted the subject will intended that interpretation but merely failed to add the language “at each generation”.

 

Best regards,

Carl Gay,

Port Angeles

 

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Wallace
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:07 PM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Lapsed bequest - Per Capita Question

 

The phrase “per capita” doesn’t automatically mean you can ignore the anti-lapse statue. Per capita and per stirpes are methods for describing how inheritances are to be apportioned. It is not a method for answering the question of what happens when a person predeceases the testator. That is left to the anti-lapse statute. 

 

My understanding is that the gift would actually go to A and B and the child of C, with all of them getting one-third share. 

 

That being said, you could certainly make the argument as to the testator’s intent precluding the anti-lapse statute. But I don’t think you’ve got an easily settled case that A & B get everything equally.

 

 

Liz.2

 

Confidentiality Note:  The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, protected by applicable legal privileges, or constitute non-public information. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.  

 

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:  To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we hereby inform you that any U. S. tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments, if any) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matter addressed herein.

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Julie Martiniello
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:47 PM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Lapsed bequest - Per Capita Question

 

This is my understanding:

 

If the Will says Per Capita, then the distribution would go to A and B equally. As Tom said, there is no lapsed gift because he put Per Capita in his Will.

 

C's child must get notice of the probate as he/she is an heir at law by right of representation and notice is required to all heirs at law in Washington. 

 

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:55 AM, James B. Dolan <jbdolan at jbdolan.com> wrote:

Colleagues:

 

Somewhat chagrined to ask the following . . . 

 

Decedent’s Will states in Article pertaining to family:

 

“I am the single father of three children, A, B, and C.  The provisions of this Will shall apply to my child(sic) named above, and their issue and any children who may be hereafter born to or adopted by me.”

 

Decedent’s Will states in Article pertaining to disposition of property:

 

“I give all of my property and estate to be equally divided between my children, A, B and C, per capita.” (Emphasis in original.) That’s it - no other conditions regarding beneficiaries are stated.

 

A and B are alive, C predeceased decedent, leaving one child.

RCW 11.12.120

Lapsed gift—Procedure and proof.

(1) If a will makes a gift to a person on the condition that the person survive the testator and the person does not survive the testator, then, unless otherwise provided, the gift lapses and falls into the residue of the estate to be distributed under the residuary clause of the will, if any, but otherwise according to the laws of descent and distribution.

(2) If the will gives the residue to two or more persons, the share of a person who does not survive the testator passes, unless otherwise provided, and subject to RCW 11.12.110 <http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=11.12.110> , to the other person or persons receiving the residue, in proportion to the interest of each in the remaining part of the residue.

 

The “per capita” language is giving me pause, and I have talked with two different attorneys who have offered two different opinions.

 

Question 1: does estate get divided between A and B only (1/2 each), or does estate get divided between A, B, and child of C (1/3 each)?

 

Question2: regardless of answer to Question 1, does C’s child receive notice of the probate?

 

Thank you for your insights.

 

Jim Dolan

 

===================

 

Jones Butler Dolan, PS

www.jbdolan.com

www.jonesbutlerdolan.com

 

Mount Vernon

 

P.O. Box 2784

415 Pine Street 

Mount Vernon, WA 98273

Telephone: 360-336-2939

Facsimile: 360-336-2949

 

Stanwood

 

P.O. Box 458

10027 - 269th Place NW (SR 532)

Stanwood, WA 98292

Telephone: 360-629-3833

Facsimile: 360-629-6253

 

 

 

 

 


_______________________________________________
WSBAPT mailing list
WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt





 

-- 

-- 

Respectfully,


Julie A. Martiniello | Attorney | DIMENSION LAW GROUP PLLC 
234 SW 43rd St, Suite MA | Renton, WA 98057
t: 206.973.3500 ext 104   |   f: 206.577.5090  | e: Julie@ <http://dimensionlaw.com/> dimensionlaw.com |  <http://www.dimensionlaw.com/> www.dimensionlaw.com

  

*EFFECTIVE APRIL 6, 2015, PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF OUR NEW ADDRESS AND FAX NUMBER*

 

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone; return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper and electronic copies. 


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone; return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper and electronic copies.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20160915/d7d47fbf/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 68600 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20160915/d7d47fbf/image002.png>


More information about the WSBAPT mailing list