[WSBAPT] Wells Fargo refusal to accept POA

Douglas Bratt djbratt at mbavancouverlaw.com
Fri Jun 3 15:07:31 PDT 2016


I agree with Heather, but give it 50/50, at best, to work.  The big banks consider themselves immune from having their decisions questioned.

The tragedy is that the only alternative is then guardianship, despite the Principal's clear wish to use a DPOA.

So many of the "do it yourself" forms on the Internet, which provide for no backups, cause huge problems when the Attorney-in-Fact, much younger, of course, than the Principal, meets a tragic end, or a debilitating injury, such that no one is left who can assist the now-incompetent Principal.

I had a recent case involving a (now) 87 year old who had appointed her son to be A-I-F about ten years ago, using an Internet-obtained DPOA form, with no back-up named (since the form didn't have a blank that needed to be filled in).  The son died had the nerve to die of a heart attack at 65.  The only other child, a resident of Arizona, was, himself in bad shape and could not help.

I had a terrible time trying to find a modest means attorney willing to establish a Guardianship (since I don't do Guardianships any more) since the Principal was on Medicaid, but still needed to have medical decisions to be made for her and monthly checks to be prepared for the portion of her Social Security that she was required to pay towards her assisted living costs.

BUT - Good News - they surely saved a bunch of money by using a form they found on the Internet, ten years ago, so they did not have to pay some crummy lawyer to simply fill out an easy form for them.  After all, if they found the form on the Internet, it must be a good and legal form and it will most certainly protect them.

Good luck.

Regards,

Doug Bratt

Douglas J. Bratt
Lawyer

[Envelope scaled Terry]

Office: (360) 213-2040
 Fax: (360) 213-2030

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email message may contain confidential or privileged information.  If you have received this message by mistake, please do not review, disclose, copy, or distribute the email. Instead, please notify us immediately by replying to this message or telephoning us.  Thank you.

NOTE:  I do not use encrypted email.  Messages sent to or from my office via email are not secure and may not be protected by attorney-client privilege.  This email address is not monitored at all times.  If your matter is urgent, please phone my office during regular business hours.

TAX ADVICE NOTICE: IRS Circular 230 requires us to advise you that, if this communication or any attachment contains any tax advice, the advice is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. A taxpayer may rely on professional advice to avoid federal tax penalties only if the advice is reflected in a comprehensive tax opinion that conforms to stringent requirements. Please contact us if you have any questions about Circular 230 or would like to discuss our preparation of an opinion that conforms to these IRS rules.






From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Heather deVrieze
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 1:14 PM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
Subject: Re: [WSBAPT] Wells Fargo refusal to accept POA

I would be inclined to start with a letter to Wells Fargo with the 11.94.040 statement of daughter (notarized) included. In my letter I would indicate that I prepared the document, believed mom to be competent (as the law defines) to execute the document.

Heather

Heather S. de Vrieze
Attorney-at-Law
[cid:image001.jpg at 01D013C2.30F35160]
3909 California Avenue SW
Seattle, WA 98116-3705
(206)938-5500
heatherd at westseattlelaw.com<mailto:heatherd at westseattlelaw.com>
www.westseattlelaw.com<http://www.westseattlelaw.com/>

Click here to connect with de Vrieze | Carney on Facebook:   [FB Logo] <https://www.facebook.com/DeVriezeCarney>

CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED. This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this e-mail message and any attachment.

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Marilyn J Kliman Law
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 12:00 PM
To: 'WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv' <wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
Subject: [WSBAPT] Wells Fargo refusal to accept POA

Guardianship seems to loom as the only viable option under circumstances explained below. Question is, is there any sense to/support for first attempting to petition to compel a third-party to accept a POA under these circumstances?

Client's mother has fairly advanced dementia and lives in a memory care facility.   Mom's son/Client's brother holds POA and has been managing Mom's affairs for a few years. Son has now suffered a severe stroke and is markedly incapacitated - remains in the hospital; cannot communicate and prognosis is not good.  No alternate AIF named - he was already the alternate to the deceased dad.

Client/Daughter and brother's wife brought Mom in to execute new POA. Mom needs funds from her brokerage account to pay for her care.  I met with Mom privately and though dementia is quite advanced, she knew who her children were, where she lived, and knew son was in the hospital. She understood that son had been taking care of her affairs. Seemed surprised but understood when I told her son was unable to help her now. When asked if she wanted her daughter to help her instead said "I guess so... I guess someone has to." I briefly explained POA, underscoring daughter's complete control and access to Mom's money.  Admittedly that didn't get a firm acknowledgment, but Mom's response was to ask for her daughter to join the meeting.  Okay. Marginal. But Mom did understand that the POA was necessary and was able to decide that that was okay with her.

Cut to Wells Fargo. For reasons unknown, brother had earlier provided them with a letter from Mom's doctor saying that she was unable to manage her affairs or make financial decisions. Go figure. So Wells Fargo is refusing to accept new POA insisting letter shows she was not competent to execute.      I do have a call in to WF's legal rep to try to go over medically versus legally pronouncing , but it's not looking hopeful.   Thoughts?






Marilyn J. Kliman, Attorney at Law
Marilyn J. Kliman Law, PLLC
510 Bell Street
Edmonds, WA 98020
206.499.0993<tel:206.499.0993>
Marilyn at MarilynJKlimanLaw.com<mailto:Marilyn at MarilynJKlimanLaw.com>
www.MarilynJKlimanLaw.com<http://www.marilynjklimanlaw.com/>
NOTICE: Information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally protected from disclosure. Our understanding is that intended recipients consent to use of e-mail unless we are notified otherwise in writing. If you are not the intended recipient, nor an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.


[https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/2016/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange_184x116-v1.png]<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>

Virus-free. www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20160603/2103443a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 7108 bytes
Desc: image005.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20160603/2103443a/image005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9370 bytes
Desc: image006.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20160603/2103443a/image006.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6775 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20160603/2103443a/image001.jpg>


More information about the WSBAPT mailing list