[WSBAPT] TEDRA Question

Rob Wilson-Hoss rob at hctc.com
Tue Apr 19 10:45:43 PDT 2016


Family Settlement Agreement Doctrine. Heirs may enter into an agreement that disposes of the estate in a plan different from that provided by a will. Collins v. Collins, 151 Wash. 201, 215, 275 P. 571 (1929). Family settlement agreements are favored and honored in Washington law to resolve a dispute among heirs if the agreement is made without fraud or injustice, and where the creditors do not have the right to intervene. Id. The policy behind upholding family settlement agreement is to avert family disputes, adjust doubtful rights, protect the honor of a family, and avoid litigation. In re Estate of Witte, 25 Wash.2d 487, 498, 171 P.2d 183 (1946) (quoting Warner v. Warner, 124 Conn. 625, 631, 1 A.2d 911 (1938)). Family settlements “should be accorded finality to the fullest extent possible, and should be encouraged and fostered as a matter of public policy.” Hadley v. Cowan, 60 Wash.App. 433, 438–39, 804 P.2d 1271 (1991).

In re Estate of Washburn, 168 Wash. App. 1043 (2012)

 

 

Robert D. Wilson-Hoss 
Hoss & Wilson-Hoss, LLP 
236 West Birch Street 
Shelton, WA 98584 
360 426-2999

www.hossandwilson-hoss.com
rob at hctc.com

 

This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or by telephone (call us collect at the number listed above) and immediately delete this message and any and all of its attachments.  Thank you.

 

This office does debt collection and this e-mail may be an attempt to collect a debt, Any information obtained will be used for that purpose.  To the extent the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. § 1692) applies this firm is acting as a debt collector for the condominium/homeowners' association named above to collect a debt owed to it. Any information obtained will be used for collection purposes. You have the right to seek advice of legal counsel.

 

From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Ross Gardner
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 10:02 AM
To: WSBA Probate & Trust Listserv
Subject: [WSBAPT] TEDRA Question

 

Good Morning All,

 

I am working on an intestate probate case where the only asset in the estate is a heavily leveraged home.  The decedent passed in 2011, and her grandson has been making upgrades to and paying for the upkeep on the home.  He has gotten it fixed up to the point that he has started to rent it out.  The decedent had 5 children, all still living and in their 50's and 60's, although most are out of state and independently wealthy.  The children have a desire to keep the property in the family, but none of them can manage the property. They want to transfer the property to the grandson outright, but cannot just waive their interest in the property because there are other grandchildren who would inherit the property along with the grandson.

 

I am wondering what the best course of action would be to handle this.  Can the estate simply quitclaim the property to the grandson?  Is a TEDRA action necessary?  Any and all thoughts are welcome.

 

Thank you so much!


 

Best Regards,

Ross Gardner
Attorney

Phone: 425-870-4430

E-Mail: Ross at rossgardnerlaw.com

Online: www.rossgardnerlaw.com <http://www.rossgardnerlaw.com/>  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20160419/3731627e/attachment.html>


More information about the WSBAPT mailing list