[WSBAPT] Amendment to RLT

[Katharine P. Bauer]

I just do a second which revokes the first in its entirety and I try to
shred all copies and originals of first one.  If you do another "first" and
copies of that first one surface for some reason, then the dispute is still
there and a claim of incapacity can arise, as in "What?  Didn't client know
he already did one??". If you do a second and copies of first are found
(missed shredding), there is no question of intent.  You can also restate
whole trust....
On Sep 24, 2015 2:22 PM, "Melinda" <mkgroutlaw at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is it ever appropriate/ acceptable to replace a "First Amendment with a
> new "First Amendment"?  I would always just do a 2d Amendment but in this
> case client is very concerned that the problem son for whom the second
> amendment reduces a gift will see that there was a change and be angry -
> causing him to seek to challenge it.
>
> Misspelled from my iPhone
>
> Melinda
>
> Law Office of Melinda K Grout
> PO Box 1360
> Monroe, WA 98272
> (360) 794-4322. Tel
> (425) 744-6745. Fax
>
> Notice:  This message is intended only for the addressee, and may contain
> confidential and/or privileged information.  If you are not the intended
> recipient, it is too late to stop reading, but please do not use it for any
> improper purpose.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBAPT mailing list
> WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbapt/attachments/20150924/19d13007/attachment.html>