[WSBAPT] Amendment to RLT

[Tom Stuen]

You could do a "Complete Restatement", but calling the amendment a First
seems to me to be a misrepresentation.  It would need to revoke the original
First anyway, and by mentioning it, the change would be emphasized.
Thomas Stuen

-----Original Message-----
From: wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbapt-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Melinda
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 2:20 PM
To: wsbapt at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: [WSBAPT] Amendment to RLT

Is it ever appropriate/ acceptable to replace a "First Amendment with a new
"First Amendment"?  I would always just do a 2d Amendment but in this case
client is very concerned that the problem son for whom the second amendment
reduces a gift will see that there was a change and be angry - causing him
to seek to challenge it. 

Misspelled from my iPhone

Melinda

Law Office of Melinda K Grout
PO Box 1360
Monroe, WA 98272
(360) 794-4322. Tel
(425) 744-6745. Fax

Notice:  This message is intended only for the addressee, and may contain
confidential and/or privileged information.  If you are not the intended
recipient, it is too late to stop reading, but please do not use it for any
improper purpose.




_______________________________________________
WSBAPT mailing list
WSBAPT at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbapt