[Vision2020] Fw:[Spam 3.60] Bipartisan Legislation to SupportVictims of Violence Signed Into Law
Paul Rumelhart
godshatter at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 8 15:13:56 PST 2013
Wow, the thread has already been Godwin'd.
There are valid reasons why someone might object to this bill, that I think people can relate to even if they aren't a concern for them personally. According to Wikipedia, the ACLU criticized it in it's first incarnation because there were provisions for mandatory HIV testing when only charged with a crime that they thought had privacy concerns. I don't know if those provisions are in the current re-authorization or not. Some people object to it because it has provisions for non-tribal people to be charged in tribal courts, which they think might mean that some of their Constitutional rights of those non-tribal people might not be adequately protected in such a situation. Phyllis Schlafly objects to it because it promotes "divorce, breakup of marriage and hatred of men." And yes, some people wanted to reduce services to undocumented immigrants and LGBT individuals.
I was just wondering if anyone knew what he objected to specifically.
Paul
________________________________
From: Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com>
To: Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com>
Cc: Sue Hovey <suehovey at moscow.com>; lfalen <lfalen at turbonet.com>; "vision2020 at moscow.com" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Fw:[Spam 3.60] Bipartisan Legislation to SupportVictims of Violence Signed Into Law
Paul Rumelhart inquires:
"Has anyone seen any statements made by Raul Labrador as to his reasons for voting against it?"
No.
And come to think about it, nobody asked Hitler why he killed six million Jews, either.
Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .
"Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)
http://www.MoscowCares.com
Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho
"There's room at the top they are telling you still But first you must learn how to smile as you kill
If you want to be like the folks on the hill."
- John Lennon
On Mar 8, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com> wrote:
Has anyone seen any statements made by Raul Labrador as to his reasons for voting against it?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130308/65506cbd/attachment.html>
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list