<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt">Wow, the thread has already been Godwin'd.<br><br>There are valid reasons why someone might object to this bill, that I think people can relate to even if they aren't a concern for them personally. According to Wikipedia, the ACLU criticized it in it's first incarnation because there were provisions for mandatory HIV testing when only charged with a crime that they thought had privacy concerns. I don't know if those provisions are in the current re-authorization or not. Some people object to it because it has provisions for non-tribal people to be charged in tribal courts, which they think might mean that some of their Constitutional rights of those non-tribal people might not be adequately protected in such a situation. Phyllis Schlafly objects to it because it promotes "divorce, breakup of marriage and
hatred of men." And yes, some people wanted to reduce services to undocumented immigrants and LGBT individuals.<br><br>I was just wondering if anyone knew what he objected to specifically.<br><br>Paul<br><div><span><br></span></div><div><br></div> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Tom Hansen <thansen@moscow.com><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Paul Rumelhart <godshatter@yahoo.com> <br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> Sue Hovey <suehovey@moscow.com>; lfalen <lfalen@turbonet.com>; "vision2020@moscow.com" <vision2020@moscow.com> <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Friday, March 8, 2013 2:38 PM<br> <b><span
style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [Vision2020] Fw:[Spam 3.60] Bipartisan Legislation to SupportVictims of Violence Signed Into Law<br> </font> </div> <br>
<meta http-equiv="x-dns-prefetch-control" content="off"><div id="yiv1585973336"><div><div style="">Paul Rumelhart inquires:</div><div style=""><br></div><div><span style="">"</span><span style="">Has anyone seen any statements made by Raul Labrador as to his reasons for voting against it?"</span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">No. </span></div><div><span style=""><br></span></div><div><span style="">And come to think about it, nobody asked Hitler why he killed six million Jews, either.<br></span><br><div style="">Seeya round town, Moscow, because . . .</div><div style=""><br></div><div style="">"Moscow Cares" (the most fun you can have with your pants on)</div><div style="">http://www.MoscowCares.com</div><div style=""> </div><div style=""><div>Tom Hansen</div><div>Moscow, Idaho</div><div><br></div><div>"<span style="font-size:medium;">There's room at the top they are telling you still</span><span
style="font-size:medium;"> </span></div><span style="font-size:medium;">But first you must learn how to smile as you kill </span><br style="font-size:medium;"><span style="font-size:medium;">If you want to be like the folks on the hill."</span></div><div style=""><font size="3"><span style=""><br></span></font></div><div style=""><font size="3"><span style="">- John Lennon<br></span></font><div> </div></div></div><div style=""><br>On Mar 8, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Paul Rumelhart <<a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:godshatter@yahoo.com">godshatter@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="">Has anyone seen any statements made by Raul Labrador as to his reasons for voting against it?</blockquote></div></div><meta http-equiv="x-dns-prefetch-control" content="on"><br><br> </div> </div> </div></body></html>