[Vision2020] Zimmy beams as he tours gun factory

Joe Campbell philosopher.joe at gmail.com
Sun Aug 25 17:01:31 PDT 2013


In a more perfect world than yours either TM would be alive or GZ would be in jail. Reckless is the most diplomatic way to describe his actions. 

On Aug 25, 2013, at 3:36 PM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com> wrote:

> 
> Bullshit.  He was buying a home defense weapon.  If there were death threats against me and mine, I would do the same.  Besides, he was found not guilty.  In a perfect world, he could whatever the fuck he wanted.
> 
> Paul
> 
> On 08/25/2013 02:53 PM, Scott Dredge wrote:
>> Based on photographic evidence, audio evidence, the measurable timeline, GZ's medical report, TM's autopsy report combined with corroborating witness testimony, it's difficult to draw any conclusion other than TM being on top of GZ and hitting him for at least 45 seconds prior to the fatal and only shot.  GZ shouldn't have followed TM and should have stayed in his truck.  TM shouldn't have attacked him.  But TM did what he did and GZ did what he did, so here we are.
>> 
>> This whole thing has already spun as a 'perfect storm'.  And if GZ is going to do things like tour a Kel Tec factory, pose for photo ops, and let it be known he's interested in acquiring more fire power, he's putting himself, his family, and anyone around him in danger.  His actions are tantamount to 'bring it on' taunting.  Don't be surprised if someone takes the bait resulting in more tragedy.  Don't be surprised if GZ blasts someone innocent that he mistakenly believes was coming after him.  Don't be surprised when there is another dead body and GZ claims 'self defense'.
>> 
>> From: sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
>> To: godshatter at yahoo.com; philosopher.joe at gmail.com
>> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 13:11:03 -0700
>> CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Zimmy beams as he tours gun factory
>> 
>> He wasn't 'going out to call the police on criminal activity.' He could have called them from his home and stayed there. Why do you even saying that? 
>> 
>> He was out and about because he wanted to play the cop, and he had a gun. He could have stayed home with his gun, like he was told to do. 
>> 
>> You keep assuming his defense theory is true. It was effective, it led to the verdict, but that doesn't make it true.
>> 
>> Sunil
>> 
>> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 11:55:13 -0700
>> From: godshatter at yahoo.com
>> To: philosopher.joe at gmail.com
>> CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Zimmy beams as he tours gun factory
>> 
>> Do you think that neighborhood watch programs are a bad thing?  If you can posit for a moment that guns can come in handy for self-defense, then going out to call the police on criminal activity might be a time when you have a better chance of needing to protect yourself than when you are, say, just going to get groceries.
>> 
>> If you think it wasn't self-defense, then why was Zimmerman doing his best to lead the cops to the encounter?  Why were there no injuries on Martin consistent with an initial attack by Zimmerman?  Do you think he shot him first?  Then why did witnesses see them on the ground fighting?  To me, it just doesn't add up.
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> From: Joe Campbell <philosopher.joe at gmail.com>
>> To: Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com> 
>> Cc: Scott Dredge <scooterd408 at hotmail.com>; viz <vision2020 at moscow.com> 
>> Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 9:26 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Zimmy beams as he tours gun factory
>> 
>> "... he thought he was going to die and defended himself." First, the only evidence you have for this is that Zimmerman said it was so. There were no witnesses to corroborate this. We don't know what happened. My interpretation of the results of the trial is that there was no reason to disbelieve Zimmerman, so no reason to find him guilty. That does not mean that we should believe him. There is no reason to believe him either. The fact is we don't know what happened in those moments prior to the shooting.
>> 
>> Second, Zimmerman was out looking for "criminals" like some want-a-be cop, stalked a suspected criminal who turned out to be a boy, called to report it and was advised to stop but didn't do so, got out of his car to follow the "suspect," then (supposedly) shot the boy because he feared for his life. 
>> 
>> I'm sorry but if you are not a cop and you leave your house with a gun pretending to "protect" your neighborhood, my sympathy                               level will drop dramatically should something go wrong. 
>> 
>> Zimmerman's actions do not sound like self-defense to me. I am not warped by the                             mainstream media. In fact, I think this is just another example of how fear and guns                             together are more likely to lead to a bad outcome than a good one. Incidents like this are precisely why we need gun control. Some people are just not smart enough to know how to use guns with the required safety and care. The Zimmerman case proves that. 
>> 
>> And saying that folks are dupes just because they happen to share some of the views of the mainstream media is no different from saying that you are a racist just because you happen to share some of the views of racists.
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm not supporting Zimmerman.  I'm just dismayed by the attitudes people have towards him based on nothing but wishful thinking, as far as I can see.  These attitudes are shared across the country, and is making life for this man dangerous.  All because he thought he was going to die and defended himself. His bad luck that he did so at a time when guns are the new boogieman, and that his attacker didn't have the common sense to be a white male.
>> 
>> It's really how quickly and absolutely this narrative I keep talking about solidified that scares the ever-living crap out of me.  It means the main stream media is still king, and that your average American still just soaks it right up apparently uncritically.
>> 
>> Oh, and I don't plan to shut up, thank you anyway.
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> 
>> On 08/25/2013 08:39 AM, Joe Campbell wrote:
>> Of course I don't condone the bounty, or death threats. It is still a mystery to me why you keep condoning Zimmerman. If you want folks to stop talking about him, why don't you start us off? Really, I only post on that guy when you or others try to defend him, or act shocked about the public outrage. Otherwise, I don't really think about him much.
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Paul Rumelhart <godshatter at yahoo.com> wrote:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20130825/16f5b226/attachment.html>


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list