[Vision2020] Steven James Sitler Marriage (was Response to Website Contact (rec'd from TomandRodna.com)

[Tom Hansen]

Strictly my opinion (as well as many other peeps that have expressed
likewise off list), but I believe the willingness to accept/promote such
an ill-based unity (destined to grow with offspring) can be explained by
one word; M-O-N-E-Y.  One can rightfully assume that "contributions" to a
local organization, by parties concerned, will increase manifold.  I
would, in this case, use the term "tithing", but that would attribute a
religious affiliation with an organization that, in so many many ways it
is not deserving.

Perhaps the "happy couple" will find sanctity in another, less visible
jurisdiction . . . like Nevada for instance, another prayer for tomorrow's
breakfast.

Seeya round town, Moscow.

Tom Hansen
Moscow, Idaho






On Wed, May 4, 2011 11:10 am, Saundra Lund wrote:
> Hi Rose et al,
>
>
>
> Rose, thanks for bringing the discussion back where it belongs:  on the
> upcoming unholy marriage of Steven James Sitler.  Yuppers - I've typed out
> his entire name to help those who may be Goggling this piece of moral
> slime,
> and I suspect there are more than a few people wanting to know more about
> this upcoming perversion of the "sanctity of marriage" to be conducted by
> none other than Doug Wilson.
>
>
>
> I'd also like to thank "Concerned" for contacting Tom Hansen because that
> prompted a renewed interest in this particular perversion.  When I first
> learned of Sitler's upcoming marriage, the thought that plagued me was
> wondering what kind of woman would marry a serial pedophile?  I don't mean
> to be graphic, but what kind of pathetic woman could ever allow the touch
> of
> a man who got his sexual gratification from little kids????
>
>
>
> Personally, I'd be compelled to vomit each time he touched my hand or
> "protectively" put his arm around my shoulder or waist, which has always
> been the reaction of emotionally healthy women to sexual predators,
> pedophiles or otherwise.  As for sex?  Are you kidding me?!  How does a
> woman ever have sex with a man whom she knows is exclusively or primarily
> sexually interested in little kids?!?!  The obvious answer is that only a
> woman with profound issues of her own would ever do so.
>
>
>
> Of course, we know it happens from the news stories:  this country has far
> too many morally & emotionally bankrupt women willing to throw children -
> their own & the children of others -- under the bus for the "love" of a
> man.
>
>
>
> Don't get me wrong:  I absolutely believe in God's grace.  But as a woman
> &
> a mother, there's no way in God's green acres I think it ever appropriate
> to
> give sexual comfort to a man responsible for the murder of who all those
> little children could have become (remember, there were many victims, both
> little boys & little girls, and all were well pre-pubescent).  Anyone a
> part
> of that sick scenario clearly doesn't Know God, no matter how many
> protestations to the contrary.  God's grace-yes; laying down with a
> pedophile monster - no way in hell.
>
>
>
> I'm absolutely gob-smacked and disgusted beyond words by the conspiracy of
> Christ Church's hierarchy to marry off their own serial pedophile to
> another
> of the flock.  Yet another example, perhaps, of folks being deceived by
> claims of piety by wolves in sheep clothing.  OTOH, perhaps we should
> expect
> no better from a group oh, so willing to swallow the drivel of SSAIW.
>
>
>
> I cannot even imagine the absolute glee about the impending unholy union
> by
> Sitler's extremely dysfunctional parents, who undoubtedly think that
> pedophilia -- like "The Gay" - can be prayed away.  It's frankly repugnant
> that these people still haven't figured out that Denial isn't a river in
> Egypt.  They probably think their prayers have been answered when instead,
> they have opened their souls to Satan.
>
>
>
> I also pity the woman - clearly, her parents think so little of her - and
> of
> their potential future grandbabies -- that they think she deserves no
> better
> than marrying a flippin' sex freak who finds little kids "hot."  It is,
> then, perhaps no great surprise that her self-esteem is so desperately low
> to marry a scummy pedophile.  Very sad  L
>
>
>
> On a more local note, one can't help but wonder why the "nuptials" <gag>
> will be taking place here rather than where the bride's family lives or
> even
> the groom's family lives?  Presumably, it's because they don't want to
> defile their own areas, much like a dog doesn't defecate where it sleeps.
>
>
>
> The only saving grace for me is I have faith that each of the people
> involved in this unholy perversion of the sacrament of marriage will have
> to
> answer to God who won't accept the sinful spin that must have permeated
> this
> ungodly lunacy from the inception of the "Get Steven Married" project.
>
>
>
> I will continue to pray that both Sitler and his "bride" <gag> are sterile
> so she doesn't become a breeding factory for Sitler's preferred sexual
> outlet.  Given the importance of "saving face" to that crowd, the
> victimization of those babes would take a distant second to "appearances."
> Don't forget that once Sitler's heinous acts were finally discovered,
> there
> was an unholy conspiracy by our "good Kirk neighbors" not only to get him
> out of the area, but also to keep Sitler's heinous crimes secret from the
> community, a conspiracy that was hugely successful for well over a year.
> I
> remember Doug Wilson's desperation when the story broke - he
> unsuccessfully
> tried to silence discussion here on the Viz.
>
>
>
> Which pretty much says it all, doesn't it?
>
>
>
> And, does anyone remember the blatantly untruthful, arrogant & threatening
> fax sent to First Step
> (http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/2006-June/031027.html) barely
> 72 hours after the Sitler story broke on V2020?  Unfortunately, the link
> in
> Mr. Owen's post is no longer active, but I have an archived copy if anyone
> wants their recollection refreshed -- out of consideration of those still
> on
> dial-up, I'm not attaching the 7 page document.
>
>
>
>
>
> Unlike "Concerned," I have the courage to sign my name to what I write:
>
> Saundra Lund
>
> Moscow, ID
>
>
>
> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do
> nothing.
>
> ~ Edmund Burke
>
>
>
> ***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2011 through life
> plus
> 70 years, Saundra Lund.  Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce
> outside
> the Vision 2020 forum without the express written permission of the
> author.*****
>
>
>
>
>
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> On Behalf Of Rosemary Huskey
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:38 PM
> To: 'Joe Campbell'; 'Paul Rumelhart'
> Cc: 'Moscow Vision 2020'
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Response to Website Contact (rec'd from
> TomandRodna.com)
>
>
>
> At the risk of intruding into what appears to be a two-party conversation
> I
> would like to address the issues you have raised about anonymity, Paul. In
> this particular case, it seems to me that "Concerned" was stating his/her
> opinion, about the posting of photographs of Steven Sitler along with
> related (Legally Obtained) documents.  As far as I can tell, no one on
> V2020
> is suggesting that the anonymous author is defending Steven Sitler's
> horrendous behavior.  In fact, I agreed entirely with Doug Wilson's
> assessment of ChoMo Sitlerm four years ago when he wrote:
> <http://www.dougwils.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2451:J
> oan-Opyr-Cub-Reporter&catid=68:moscow-diversity-cleansing> "I believe that
> if Steven [Sitler] is returned to our community, he should be welcomed as
> a
> criminal and serial pedophile and a dangerous man, as well as a sinner who
> professes repentance."
>
> Consequently, it is absolutely astonishing that Doug and his band of merry
> men can, in the space of four years, completely transformed and reinvent
> Mr.
> Steven Sitler from a criminal, serial pedophile, dangerous man to a
> delightful and godly young man who will be marrying an NSA graduate with
> the
> blessing of the Kirk and the elders. Doug Wilson, will be officiating at
> the
> June 11th wedding.  Who would've thunk it would turn out like this?
>
> Rose Huskey
>
>


"The Pessimist complains about the wind, the Optimist expects it to
changeand the Realist adjusts his sails."

 - Unknown