[Vision2020] discharging firearms
Craine Kit
kcraine at frontier.com
Fri Nov 5 19:12:14 PDT 2010
Since languages change over time, perhaps the question should be "how
was 'bear' defined when the constitution was written"?
Kit Craine
On Nov 5, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Garrett Clevenger <garrettmc at frontier.com>
wrote:
> I got my definition at dictionary.com. It was the last definition
> for the verb "bear"
>
> "22. to have and use; exercise: to bear authority; to bear sway."
>
> Perhaps it's a gun lover conspiracy to change the word to fit their
> favor?
>
>
> If "to use" is not a legitimate definition of the word, I apologize.
> If that's the case, all government would have to do is heavily
> regulate ammunition if they really wanted to limit death by fire-arm.
>
> Although probably not in Idaho since its firearm amendment says:
>
> "No law shall impose licensure, registration or special taxation on
> the
> ownership or possession of firearms or ammunition."
>
> In otherwords, good luck regulating Idaho's 'militia.'
>
> I doubt the founders intended for every person to be able to keep
> and bear arms. At least they wouldn't want slaves and women to have
> that right considering the disparity of the day. But they may have
> wanted militias to have access to the best weapons available.
>
>
> gclev
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list