[Vision2020] 'Obama Tags' Called a Joke

Tue Sep 1 18:43:25 PDT 2009

Au contraire, mon pauvre con fraire! You are incorrect in multiple (read all) instances. 

1. Vague? Please allow me to quote verbatim "I will come to your place of work and punch you right in the nose." Your notion of vague is as sketchy as your self control. One can but wonder what you might consider overt.

2. I reposted your silly, impotent threat directly to the V. Dale picked it up from there. I am under zero obligation to keep unsolicited junk e-mail private.

3. At no time did I assert that you had no right to make moronic threats that you were incapable of carrying out. Should any of the above be in doubt, refresh your failing memory at:

[Vision2020] thin skinned?   g. crabtree Thu May 18 20:07:59 PDT 2006 

4. Hypocrite? My reason for reposting your shining example of poor impulse control was driven by the fact that just a few days prior you had elected to edify our community with an editorial in the local daily paper on your version of proper community dialog and tolerance. When it comes to hypocrites of stature I would think you might search a little closer to home.

On a side note, why is it when this subject comes up via others you shriek like a stiffed strumpet but when you imagine it works for your weak to nonexistent argument you trot it out like a prized pony. Hypocrite indeed!

g
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Joe Campbell 
  To: g. crabtree 
  Cc: Andreas Schou ; Moscow Vision 2020 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:46 AM
  Subject: Re: [Vision2020] 'Obama Tags' Called a Joke

  You certainly cared when I made a vague threat to you a few years back and you shipped a personal letter from me to you to you friend Dale to post on his website. We didn't here much talk about free speech then!

  I have to say, you are the biggest hypocrite and the most one sided zealot I have ever met! Which is funny since you are constantly accusing others of hypocracy.

  Sent from my iPhone

  On Sep 1, 2009, at 7:17 AM, "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com> wrote:

    Truth be told, I don't much care about "vague threats" one way or the other. I believe in the first amendment protection of free speech even if it's distasteful or inflammatory to some. I don't believe that for one group it's "the highest form of patriotism" and for another it's "hate speech." Stupid and ill-considered remarks are an equal right not a "two wrongs don't make a right" as one of our more deranged posters has suggested.

    I am going to have to take your word for the beliefs of "AR-15 toting dude"  and friends. As you probably know, I disagree with most of what you claim they profess. That said, I don't think that exercising a protected right qualifies as a vague threat. Arizona, along with Idaho are open carry states and as such what AR15td was doing was completely legal. If that makes someone "uncomfortable" or scared that is their right as well. Americans are entitled to their feelings. I find your attitude in this regard strange however. This (Idaho) being a concealed carry state as well as open, the number of firearms that surround you on a daily basis is rather large. Every major group you are among contains dozens of lethal pieces of hardware. Do you find this debilitating?

    So, your qualms in order. Where you feel "comfortable" is a purely personal concern. It is not the responsibility of others. Speaking strictly for myself, tie dye and the public display of hacky sacks makes me a little queasy but I suck it up and deal.

    Second and third, the waste of resources issue is a non-starter. The SS and law enforcement is there anyway and the way the government wastes resources, this doesn't even amount to a tiny portion of a drop in the bucket. If this is truly a concern for you, a better, easier, and cheaper solution would be for you to insist that the president stay in the whitehouse and try to accomplish something useful and stop with the 24/7/365 campaign for adulation.

    Your fourth and final point I don't really understand. Are you suggesting that police and responsible firearms owners will suddenly become unhinged and commence with a recreation of the OK corral? That the guns will suddenly develop a mind of their own (shades of the dumbest of Steven King's pap) and turn on their owners? Or are you suggesting, as a great many of those with your "strong and contrary beliefs" do, that one group of peoples rights should be taken away to cover for some vague and unlikely possibility and to make another group a little more at ease?

    g
      From: Andreas Schou 
      To: g. crabtree 
      Cc: Moscow Vision 2020 
      Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 8:17 PM
      Subject: Re: [Vision2020] 'Obama Tags' Called a Joke

      Gary --

      I'm just not sure on your position here. Do you think people should be making vague threats against the President or not? Or are you just accusing the liberals here of being hypocrites without taking a position yourself?

      Here's your way out. I'm a little confused as to why you didn't take it: 

      These aren't my people; I'm not responsible for them. They're crazy; I'm not. The assault rifle guys are from the We The People Foundation, which is an advocacy organization for tax protesters. They're also birthers. They print their own money. They want to return to the gold standard. They believe the Venezuelan government stole the last US election by tampering with US voting machines. They bear little, if any, relationship to you -- by which I mean, "the near side of the far right." I find some of your beliefs distasteful; however, I find them comprehensible. Not so much with these lunatics.

      I also mentioned that I found the protester with the AR-15 a little scary. 

      He showed up at a Presidential rally toting an assault rifle. His pastor's praying for Obama's death. He won't disavow an intent to kill the President while being interviewed on television,. His buddy showed up with a rifle and a threatening sign at the New Hampshire rally. There's a difference between a vague threat delivered by a puppet-wielding sociology undergrad across the country and a threat delivered by a militia gunman a block away.  

      Neither, you might note, is likely to actually to kill the President. That's not, however, what I'm worried about. First, I have a lot of strong and contrary political beliefs. I'm uncomfortable expressing them with my back to military-grade firearms. I think this is reasonable. Second, an armed and licensed person a block away from the President is a waste of resources, given that it's probably a good idea to keep a Secret Service sniper on him at all times. Third, keeping a Secret Service sniper on fifty gun-toting militia members is a logistical nightmare, and there appears to be no good way to prevent fifty gun-toting idiots from showing up. Fourth, the introduction of firearms to a situation with a lot of shouting and pushing, threatening signs, twitchy cops, and security cordons is an awful idea. Someone will get hurt. It is unlikely to be Obama, but that doesn't mean I don't care.

      -- ACS

      On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 5:59 PM, g. crabtree <jampot at roadrunner.com> wrote:

        It seems to me that you and campbell are in a neck and neck competition to post the most addled response to my pointing out yet another spot of hypocrisy with regard to the Rammell quip. Fortunately for you, past experience indicates that the man with a fallacy for all seasons will always ultimately win out in competitions such as this. Just for fun however, why don't you expound a moment upon why "AR-15 toting dude" gives you the vapors and provide an instance or two of my attempts to "claim" him. Who knows, with enough breathless hyperbole, disjointed prose, and outright disregard for truthfulness you might just give the pedantic perfesser a run for his money!

        g
          ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: Andreas Schou 
          To: the lockshop 
          Cc: Moscow Vision 2020 
          Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 11:10 AM
          Subject: Re: [Vision2020] 'Obama Tags' Called a Joke

          Gary --

          Incidentally, I'm more concerned about things like the AR-15-toting dude showing up to the Obama rally while refusing to disavow calling for Obama's assassination. Rex Rammel is a national joke who can't keep his mouth shut. This guy... less so. And, incidentally, Gary, since he's a member of the Libertarian party and a militia crank, I don't think he's "yours," except insofar as you try to keep claiming him.

          -- ACS

          For those of you that haven't seen the follow-up: http://www.abc15.com/content/news/southeastvalley/tempe/story/Tempe-pastor-reiterates-wish-for-President-Obamas/MX2Vzd4unEi9n8PschT50w.cspxu 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

          =======================================================
           List services made available by First Step Internet, 
           serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
                         http://www.fsr.net                       
                    mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
          =======================================================

    =======================================================
    List services made available by First Step Internet, 
    serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
                  http://www.fsr.net                       
             mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
    =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20090901/846b49ae/attachment-0001.html 