[Vision2020] Time to Recall Al Gore's Oscar

Objective Reason objectivereason at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 22:03:25 PDT 2009


http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/16/recall-al-gores-oscar-stat/

Time to Recall Al Gore’s
Oscar<http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/16/recall-al-gores-oscar-stat/>
by
* James Hudnall <http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/author/jhudnall> *

Al Gore, Jr. has a history of trying to juke stats to get results he wants.
In the 2000 election, he wanted the Florida recount to only look at ballots
in three counties with large Democrat populations and he wanted to block
military votes from soldiers overseas. The reason for this was simple. He
wanted the results that would make him a winner, he did not want to risk
that by including all the votes in the state, especially from conservative
areas like the Panhandle.

[image: al-gore-thumbs-up]

After a court in England decreed that there were 11 “inaccuracies” in “An
Inconvenient Truth”<http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/09/court-identifies-eleven-inaccuracies-al-gore-s-inconvenient-truth>,
many of which could be classified as outright lies and false claims, Gore
did not recut the film. So when film director Phelim McAleer asked him if he
would fix the problem, Gore refused to
answer<http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/annmcelhinney/2009/10/11/al-gore-the-death-of-journalism/>
and
McAleer’s mic was cut.

It’s not surprising that Gore is being evasive. When a “peer reviewed” study
of tree rings used in the UN’s IPCC reports referenced by people like Gore,
was revisited by scientists, guess what they
discovered?<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09/29/yamal_scandal/>

At least eight papers purporting to reconstruct the historical temperature
record times may need to be revisited, with significant implications for
contemporary climate studies, the basis of the IPCC’s assessments. A number
of these involve senior climatologists at the British climate research
centre CRU at the University East Anglia. In every case, peer review failed
to pick up the errors.

Yes, these peer reviewed scientists cherry picked the data to arrive at a
conclusion they liked. Sound familiar? It gets worse, They mysteriously lost
the climate studies they did over the years that were supposed to prove the
climate was warming.<http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTBiMTRlMDQxNzEyMmRhZjU3ZmYzODI5MGY4ZWI5OWM>Oops!

British news sources that once told us Global Warming was real are now
changing their tune.<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1220052/Austria-sees-earliest-snow-history-America-sees-lowest-temperatures-50-years-So-did-global-warming-go.html?ITO=1490#>In
fact, 2009 may become the year that the
Global Warming scam met its “tipping
point.”<http://www.climatedepot.com/a/3310/Losing-Their-Religion-2009-officially-declared-year-the-media-lost-their-faith-in-manmade-global-warming-fears>

It should come as no surprise Gore was made a hero by people who like to
believe in the AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) fantasy. After all, it’s
immensely egotistical to think humans are going to change the climate when
one major volcano eruption can easily eclipse all the industrial output of
the 20th century combined. It’s happened
before<http://www.earlham.edu/%7Ebubbmi/krakatoa.htm>in modern times
and we’re still here.

Considering that Gore based his film on fiction and lies, and has made no
effort to correct his “mistakes,” he deserves neither a Documentary Oscar
nor a Nobel Prize. Of course, the Nobel has been given to other
liars<http://www.upress.umn.edu/Books/A/arias_rigoberta.html>,
terrorists<http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1994/arafat-bio.html>and
frauds <http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/index.html>so
we can focus on the Oscar.

Ann McElhinney’s and Phelim McAleer’s film “Not Evil Just
Wrong<http://www.noteviljustwrong.com/>”
takes apart Gore’s crockumentary piece by piece. It’s part of a growing
movement against the AGW movement as the earth gets colder, not warmer. Gore
was not only wrong, he was scaring people. His motives are purely
avaricious, not humane. Since the film debuted he has made millions and
stands to make millions more from so called “green companies” he put in
place to reap the
windfall<http://www.powermag.com/environmental/Gore-knows-best_1351.html>from
the hysteria.

For this and the fact that documentaries are supposed to be based in some
kind of facts, Al Gore’s Oscar needs to be rescinded.

Let’s start a petition.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20091016/3b42f4e1/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Vision2020 mailing list