[Vision2020] He's Baaaaaaack . . .

[Andreas Schou]

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:31 AM, g. crabtree <jampot at roadrunner.com> wrote:

>  Once again I'm confused. I thought I was directly addressing your
> argument. Perhaps I misunderstood. It looked to me as though you were trying
> to assert that since no one had yet to attach a dollar value to the matter
> that "it is not clear what the worry is about." I was merely pointing out
> a potential flaw in that line of reasoning.
>
> For the record, I have no idea of the specifics of Mr. Glasebooks
> complaint. I have not spoken to him or anyone else about the matter. My
> point is, was, and will continue to be that IF a university employee was
> using taxpayer time and resources to advance a personal agenda then a
> private citizen is well within their rights to bring the matter up and have
> it addressed. Period.
>

Maybe what you don't understand what's going on. "Bring it up and have it
addressed" is not the same as "have a court order the governor to fire
whomever Glasebrook believes was involved," which is what he's requesting.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20090119/7808fe8a/attachment.html