<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:31 AM, g. crabtree <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jampot@roadrunner.com">jampot@roadrunner.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff">
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">Once again I'm confused. I thought I was directly
addressing your argument. Perhaps I misunderstood. It looked to me as though you
were trying to assert that since no one had yet to attach a dollar value to
the matter that "<font size="3" face="Times New Roman">it is not clear what
the worry is about." <font face="Arial">I</font><font face="Franklin Gothic Medium"> </font><font size="2" face="Arial">was merely
pointing out a potential flaw in that line of
reasoning.</font></font></font></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">For the record, I have no idea of the specifics of
Mr. Glasebooks complaint. I have not spoken to him or anyone else about the
matter. My point is, was, and will continue to be that IF a university employee
was using taxpayer time and resources to advance a personal agenda then a
private citizen is well within their rights to bring the matter up and have it
addressed. Period. </font></div></div></blockquote><div><br>Maybe what you don't understand what's going on. "Bring it up and have it addressed" is not the same as "have a court order the governor to fire whomever Glasebrook believes was involved," which is what he's requesting. <br>
</div></div><br>