[Vision2020] BACK to the Original Question

bear at moscow.com bear at moscow.com
Fri Apr 17 11:05:13 PDT 2009


Sunil,

I guess what bothers me the most about it becoming a personal attack against you as
opposed 
to a vigorous argument against what the issue at hand is.

He seems to think that defense lawyers should not defend clients with vigor or use all of
the 
tools that are provided by law, which WOULD make them snakes!  Why don't people realize
that 
the most vile offenders are the ones that need a zealous defense the most, and that's the
way 
the system is designed to work! Just because you defend a client, doesn't mean you condone

what they are alleged to have done, nor do you share the same beliefs! 

AND, it seems based on the last election here in Latah County, that the People of Latah
County 
have no problem with the results of the prosecution of the child molester case that he is
so 
upset about. We just had an election back in November and there was a choice between a new

county prosecutor  or the same one that was involved in the child molester case. The
People  
spoke and are happy with the ability of a child molester to walk the streets, or they
would have 
changed the elected officer that enabled that.

And as far as the sun rising in the east is concerned, it shouldn't! Doesn't God know that
means 
the sun comes up over the  slave owning, wife beating, 8 year old bride marrying Moslems 
first? They should be denied sun until they change their evil ways! *S*
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Typical, and predictable as the sun rising in the East. When Donovan is
w> rong he can't admit it, and if I call him on it he will launch into this
> slimy attack. Kind of like a jellyfish.
> 
> He's an interesting case study.  The prolapse has clearly extruded his
enti> re brain, yet he retains sufficient coordination to operate a keyboard.
> 
> Sunil
> 
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:28:46 -0700
> From: donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] BACK to the Original Question
> To: vision2020 at moscow.com; sunilramalingam at hotmail.com;
thansen at moscow.> com; bear at moscow.com
> 
> Sorry, I disagree. 
>  
> I do agree with what the Ten Commandments say. But I think lots of people
d> isagree with what the Ten Commandments intend and imply. 
>  
> What I think is a crock is their release. The reality is, child
molesters>  are free, in part, because of the actions of Sunil. You can call it
wh> atever you want, blame it on anyone else, but that is the reality. 
>  
> And I would not be calling the release of child molesters, "due
process.">  That term is such an injustice to the victims of these people, or shall
> I call these child molesters, at the risk of offending some liberals on
h> ere, monsters. 
>  
> Best Regards,
>  
> Donovan
> 
> --- On Fri, 4/17/09, bear at moscow.com <bear at moscow.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: bear at moscow.com <bear at moscow.com>
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] BACK to the Original Question
> To: "Donovan Arnold" <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>, "vision 2020"
<visio> n2020 at moscow.com>, "Sunil Ramalingam" <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>,
"T> om Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
> Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 8:11 AM
> 
> 
> Donovan, What a CROCK! 
> 
> First you don't believe what the Ten Commandments say, and now you don't
> like the way the 
> law works! IF I read the court documents correctly, there was a JUDGE
tha> t released him,
> not 
> Sunil! I am sorry that the State of Idaho, as represented by a
prosecutor>  didn't prove
> his/her 
> case that the individual was a threat to society. You're pointing the
finge> r in the WRONG 
> direction on how the legal system worked in this case!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________________> 
_________________
> > Hansen,
> >  
> > Certainly not a lawyer with a forked tongue that misleads people to draw
> > the wrong conclusions and to free child molesters.   
> > The child molester can at least claim mental illness for this
endangermen> t
> > of children. But what can Sunil claim? 
> > I remember, if my memory
>  serves me correctly, at how angry Hansen was that
> > our local child molester of an eight year old girl, was allowed to
driv> e,
> w> ithout supervision, to Lewiston. Guess who was, in part,
responsib> le for
> > his release into the Moscow Public?  
> > Best Regards,
> >  
> > Donovan 
> > 
> > --- On Fri, 4/17/09, Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 






---------------------------------------------
This message was sent by First Step Internet.
           http://www.fsr.com/




More information about the Vision2020 mailing list