[Vision2020] A Plea to Saundra Lund

lfalen lfalen at turbonet.com
Wed Oct 29 15:27:40 PDT 2008 

I do not think that the associations in themselves are a problem. The fact that he denies  them is. If you are referring to McCain's association with Keeting 25 years ago, he has not denied it. In fact he said "it was the biggest mistake he ever made". Please note I am not overly enamored with McCain either.
Roger
-----Original message-----
From: "Saundra Lund" sslund_2007 at verizon.net
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:03:03 -0700
To: "'Sunil Ramalingam'" sunilramalingam at hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] A Plea to Saundra Lund

> Hi Sunil,
> 
>  
> 
> I agree with you, however . . . 
> 
>  
> 
> If Roger thinks an acceptable distinction is adulthood vs childhood
> associations, then he should rightly start discussing McCain's unsavory
> and/or unethical adult associations.  Lord knows there's enough there to
> keep us all busy for a very long time  J
> 
>  
> 
> And, perhaps we should all be discussing McCain's adult behavior no matter
> how long ago it was.  Given his adult age, there's a heck of a lot there
> McCain would rather not have dug up . . . again.
> 
>  
> 
> Of course, I prefer to focus on issues, but if that's the game Roger wants
> to play, then I'm sure we can trust that he'll start in on McCain.
> 
>  
> 
> Otherwise, his complaints about Obama's adult associations are empty.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Saundra Lund
> 
> Moscow, ID
> 
>  
> 
> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do
> nothing.
> 
> ~ Edmund Burke
> 
>  
> 
> ***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2008 through life plus
> 70 years, Saundra Lund.  Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce outside
> the Vision 2020 forum without the express written permission of the
> author.*****
> 
>  
> 
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> On Behalf Of Sunil Ramalingam
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 1:08 PM
> Cc: Vision 2020
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] A Plea to Saundra Lund
> 
>  
> 
> I disagree completely, Roger.  It's malarkey to make an issue out of it now,
> given that Obama's association with Ayers is completely removed from the
> activities that lead to people labeling Ayers a 'terrorist.'  
> 
> If they were planning the present-day bombing of buildings, then it would be
> an issue.
> 
> Sunil
> 
> > Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:24:37 -0700
> > From: lfalen at turbonet.com
> > To: godshatter at yahoo.com; no.weatherman at gmail.com
> > CC: vision2020 at moscow.com
> > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] A Plea to Saundra Lund
> > 
> > Paul
> > Forget the 8 years old malarkey. The point is, his associate with him when
> he was an adult.
> > Roger
> > -----Original message-----
> > From: Paul Rumelhart godshatter at yahoo.com
> > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:05:28 -0700
> > To: No Weatherman no.weatherman at gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] A Plea to Saundra Lund
> > 
> > > So what is your thesis, here? That Barack Obama is a closet domestic 
> > > terrorist? That he wants to take down the government from the top 
> > > down? That he wants to open our defenses and invite the terrorists in 
> > > to trash our country as they please? I don't get what the implications 
> > > are of Obama knowing someone else who was a "domestic terrorist" when 
> > > Obama was eight years old.
> > > 
> > > What's the actual point you're trying to make?
> > > 
> > > Paul
> > > 
> > > No Weatherman wrote:
> > > > Ms. Lund:
> > > >
> > > > I made it clear from the beginning that I had only one objective in
> > > > this exercise - to force the question of Barack Obama's long-standing
> > > > personal and professional relationship with domestic terrorists.
> > > >
> > > > Joe Campbell accused my of making a "guilt by association" argument
> > > > while he pronounced me "guilty by association" because of his
> > > > delusional perception that I belong to a local church. He called me a
> > > > "neo-Nazi" even though I have decried anti-Semitism with every other
> > > > post or so.
> > > >
> > > > My objective changed early on when the name calling began in concert
> > > > with the continued gang banging of Gov Palin. Now I consider myself
> > > > balance to your catty, shrill, dishonest, disingenuous, and
> > > > discombobulated and hormonally imbalanced posts as well as Mr.
> > > > Hansen's and Dr. Gier's.
> > > >
> > > > You now claim that you object to the "***quantity***" of my posts. But
> > > > this was not the case last month when you wrote this literary
> > > > masterpiece:
> > > >
> > > > http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/2008-October/057066.html
> > > >
> > > > Let's see, you called me a "monster," a "racist monster . . . puffed
> > > > with pathetic notions of grandiosity." You called me a "troll," a
> > > > "piece of moral slime properly to be shunned by all decent people."
> > > > You declared that shunning me was a religious duty of yours lest you
> > > > be "bad Samaritans" who add to my "hate-mongering propensities."
> > > >
> > > > Funny, though, you never mentioned the "***quantity***" of my posts.
> > > >
> > > > Personally, I think you're unhinged by Palin envy though I would not
> > > > begin to speculate why.
> > > >
> > > > They say that friends don't let friends drive drunk. You seem to me to
> > > > be inebriated by hate for Palin. If I was your friend I'd pull you off
> > > > the road ASAP before you end up hurting yourself.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Saundra Lund
> <sslund_2007 at verizon.net> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >> Roger,
> > > >>
> > > >> I think you're completely wrong on this. I think what Tom and many,
> many,
> > > >> many other forum members really object to is the ***quantity*** of
> the
> > > >> troll's posts. The anonymous coward made it clear from the beginning
> that
> > > >> he wasn't interested in honest dialogue or debate but rather in
> simply
> > > >> hurling invective and insulting those who disagree with him. When
> someone
> > > >> pointed out to him that the convention in the V2020 living room was
> to try
> > > >> to limit posts to 2-3 per day, he said he'd post as much as he
> wanted. And,
> > > >> he's proceeded to do so: just in October, he's posted OVER THREE
> HUNDRED
> > > >> TIMES. Get a clue: he's nothing more than a cowardly rude troll with
> an
> > > >> agenda to disrupt and destroy this forum with his invective.
> > > >>
> > > >> While I refuse to interact with nameless cowards, I also refuse to
> allow
> > > >> this troll to turn this COMMUNITY forum into his own one-sided
> playground.
> > > >> Only when it became undeniable that the troll has absolutely no
> respect for
> > > >> the way the V2020 community works did I start standing up to the
> bully by
> > > >> posting news from the other side, and even then, my "count" is still
> way
> > > >> under a hundred for this month -- and barely over a daily average of
> three
> > > >> posts per day. And, I'll add that I've received more than a few
> offlist
> > > >> responses from folks all along the political spectrum thanking me for
> the
> > > >> articles I've been posting in response to the troll's firestorm.
> > > >>
> > > >> I see your subsequent post where you suggest that people apply
> Donovan's
> > > >> (joking or not) suggestion about dealing with the troll's record
> posting
> > > >> frequency by doing the same to me. Shame on you, Roger -- you've been
> > > >> around here long enough to know that I am a genuine participant who
> has
> > > >> posted according to our "on our honor" posting guidelines for years
> now.
> > > >>
> > > >> I do find it telling that you once again come out in defense of those
> with
> > > >> whom you agree while ignoring their multitude transgressions and
> insults
> > > >> against those with whom you disagree.
> > > >>
> > > >> So, what -- if any -- suggestions do you have to deal with trolls
> like the
> > > >> one trick pony No Weatherman's attempts to take over this forum for
> his own
> > > >> anti-Obama agenda by posting OVER THREE HUNDRED TIMES in fewer than
> 20 days?
> > > >> He's drowning out legitimate conversation and driving away list
> members and
> > > >> their participation in this COMMUNITY forum, which is indisputably
> one of
> > > >> his goals.
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes, you're completely wrong Roger -- those of us who object to the
> cowardly
> > > >> anonymous troll's attempt to take over this forum would be just as
> > > >> frustrated by the volume regardless of the topic or political
> direction.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Saundra Lund
> > > >> Moscow, ID
> > > >>
> > > >> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people
> to do
> > > >> nothing.
> > > >> ~ Edmund Burke
> > > >>
> > > >> ***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2008 through
> life plus
> > > >> 70 years, Saundra Lund. Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce
> outside
> > > >> the Vision 2020 forum without the express written permission of the
> > > >> author.*****
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
> [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> > > >> On Behalf Of lfalen
> > > >> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 11:09 AM
> > > >> To: No Weatherman; vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > >> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] A Plea to Visionaires
> > > >>
> > > >> Tom apparently only wants left wing views to be aired. Anything else
> is
> > > >> racist and profane. I would like Ton to demonstrate where No
> Wheathermans
> > > >> posts have been any more objectionable than some of his. I submit
> that they
> > > >> are objectionable and profane because he disagrees with the veiws
> > > >> expressed. No Wheatherman seems to me to do a petty good job of
> > > >> documentation when listing facts. Everyone have the right to an
> > > >> opinion(within reason) without documentation as long as it not
> presented as
> > > >> fact.
> > > >> Roger
> > > >>
> > > >> =======================================================
> > > >> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > > >> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > > >> http://www.fsr.net
> > > >> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > >> =======================================================
> > > >>
> > > >> 
> > > >
> > > > =======================================================
> > > > List services made available by First Step Internet, 
> > > > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
> > > > http://www.fsr.net 
> > > > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > > =======================================================
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > =======================================================
> > > List services made available by First Step Internet, 
> > > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
> > > http://www.fsr.net 
> > > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > =======================================================
> > > 
> > 
> > =======================================================
> > List services made available by First Step Internet, 
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
> > http://www.fsr.net 
> > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > =======================================================
> 
> 
>

More information about the Vision2020 mailing list