[Vision2020] no, he really IS a NBC

[No Weatherman]

Ms. Mix,

Please show me where I "raised the spectre of a shadowy man running
for President who probably isn't even eligible in the first place,"
where I did not qualify the "spectre" as an issue raised by a big name
Democrat that the msm has refused to cover.

Please, respectfully, I raised the issue in my second email to Joe (I
think) to point out that the msm has not vetted Barack Obama.

This particular spectre took a new turn a week or two ago when Obama's
attorneys asked the judge to toss the case. As I told ACS: "Good
lawyering, bad politics."

At that point Barack Obama gave me reason to doubt his NBC.

You don't doubt his NBC. I get it.

M Malkin doesn't doubt it. I get it.

But your arguments for not doubting his NBC are all ad homs.

Read your longest paragraph below and count the fallacies. Not once
did you try to separate the merits of the question from the person or
persons asking or answering it.

It's called ad hominem.

Btw, calling you a liar is an ad hominem argument if I use it to
discredit you. It's an ad hom because liars can tell the truth, so
it's not good enough to say, "Ms. Mix is a liar" because while you do
lie too much, it does not mean that you're lying in the given
circumstance.





On 10/15/08, keely emerinemix <kjajmix1 at msn.com> wrote:
>
>  Yes.
>
> You raised the spectre of a shadowy man running for President who probably
> isn't even eligible in the first place.
>
> "Hot Air," a right-wing website, says that the circumstances of his birth
> and the documentation thereof are sufficient for not only the acquisition of
> a passport, voter's registration card, and driver's license, but also for a
> run for the presidency, vanquishing all legal challenges thereto.  Further,
> it points out that Berg, like anyone else in the country, can file suit to
> beg the courts to  "examine" anything he wants, including, for example, who
> you might be, or whether or not my green eyes came from Mum or Daddy.
> Finally, it makes the point that Berg is a less-than-stellar thinker, and
> finishes with a call to defeat Obama on his policies, not because of
> baseless conjecture about his eligibility for office.
>
> No matter who you are -- OK, I'll ask you again:  Any connection to the
> Kirk? -- I wish you a lovely day.
>
> By the way -- those "extenuating circumstances" that you said contribute to
> my lying, hysterical breathlessness?
>
> I believe you'd probably call them "ovaries . . ."
>
> Keely
> http://keely-prevailingwinds.blogspot.com/
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:45:21 -1000
> > From: no.weatherman at gmail.com
> > To: vision2020 at moscow.com
> > Subject: Re: [Vision2020] no, he really IS a NBC
> >
> > Ms. Mix,
> >
> > I don't see where there article refutes any of Berg's claims.
> >
> > Can you please enlighten me?
> >
> >
> > On 10/14/08, keely emerinemix <kjajmix1 at msn.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > With thanks to my new friend, C. --
> > >
> > >
> http://hotair.com/archives/2008/10/12/obama-is-an-american-no-really/
> > >
> > > Keely
> > > http://keely-prevailingwinds.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows
> > > Live. See Now
> > > =======================================================
> > > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > > http://www.fsr.net
> > > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > > =======================================================
> > >
> >
> > =======================================================
> > List services made available by First Step Internet,
> > serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> > http://www.fsr.net
> > mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> > =======================================================
>
> ________________________________
> Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows
> Live. See Now