[Vision2020] responding to No Weatherman

[Bev Bafus]

Thank you Bill.  I cannot believe the number of people who are arguing with
this anonymous person.  If someone doesn't have the guts to sign their name,
they cannot be taken seriously.

Bev


-----Original Message-----
From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
[mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]On Behalf Of Bill London
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:54 AM
To: No Weatherman
Cc: vision2020 at mail-gw.fsr.net
Subject: [Vision2020] responding to No Weatherman


No Weatherman:
Until today, I have not responded to your posts for several reasons:
1. you do not have the integrity to sign your opinions
2. you stretch and mangle the truth to suit your perspectives
3. your tone and message is strident, mean-spirited, angry, and offensive

However, I am going to respond this one time -- just to gloat.
The joke, you see, is all on you.  The more you sputter and bellow, the
worse it gets for you.
The national numbers clearly show this is happening in all parts of this
country -- Americans are finally awakening to the reality of your kind of
divisive rhetoric.
The more the Republican spin-meisters try to compare a single sixty-year old
professor of education with a horde of bomb-throwing Islamic warriors the
worse it gets for the Republicans.  More and more voters are turned off by
what they (correctly) perceive as the  desperation of the Republican
true-believers.
One reason is that Americans are getting tired of this empty anger, and
another reason is that Obama has been masterful at reframing the issue.

So, continue if you wish, I'll be laughing as you dig your hole deeper.
BL



----- Original Message -----
From: "No Weatherman" <no.weatherman at gmail.com>
To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Election Fraud


> Chas:
>
> Dave absolutely made an argument and he premised it on the law — "they
> have to turn in fraudulent ballots, it's the law!"
>
> However, his premise neglected to consider that tiny little fact that
> ACORN broke the law when they committed felonies by knowingly
> registering dead people to vote with the intent to turn in those
> fraudulent registrations because according to them the law requires
> them to.
>
> You can't have it both ways.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Chasuk <chasuk at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:19, No Weatherman <no.weatherman at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You're arguing that once ACORN commits fraud by registering dead
>>> voters, they have a legal obligation to submit those fraudulent
>>> registrations to the state.
>>
>> Dave wasn't arguing anything.  He was stating a matter of law, which
>> you didn't refute, but twisted into an "argument," solely for the
>> purpose of making an ad hominem accusation.
>>
>
> =======================================================
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>


=======================================================
 List services made available by First Step Internet,
 serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
               http://www.fsr.net
          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
=======================================================