[Vision2020] Election Fraud

[No Weatherman]

ACS:

I appreciate your ability to zero in on exact points, even though some
of them have been off point. In this case you are *almost* on point
but not quite.

I don't care if there's been a dozen confirmed cases of voter fraud or
12 million cases. Your argument assumes that voter fraud can be easily
identified when that's not the case:

"In no state is a voter who cannot produce identification turned away
from the polls — all states have some sort of recourse for voters
without identification to cast a vote."
http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legismgt/elect/taskfc/voteridreq.htm

Loose standards like this are an open invitation to corrupt
organizations like ACORN to commit fraud and I don't know of any
effective way to stop it, especially when we see them laying the
foundation for literally hundreds of thousands of illegal votes in all
of the battleground states:

http://www.electionjournal.org/acorn-fraud-map/

In addition to this I see intent. ACORN intends to do bad things
unless you can give another reason for their felonious actions. They
intend to commit fraud and it's never been more evident than in this
election.

No surprise either that ACORN and Obama, they be peeps:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vJcVgJhNaU

Now, you don't really believe that ACORN is overwhelming the system by
submitting massive numbers of fraudulent registrations because they
want to insure a free and legal election, do you?



On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Andreas Schou <ophite at gmail.com> wrote:
> NW --
>
> Registration fraud bothers me insofar as it translates into voter fraud.
> Eight years of Republican obsession over voter fraud has been unable to
> bring more than a dozen cases. Can you provide any documentation of any
> repeat votes being made in the name of cartoon characters or sports figures?
>
> -- ACS
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:51 PM, No Weatherman <no.weatherman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> ACS:
>>
>> I understand the implicit charge you're laying at my feet and if I'm
>> correct, the other side of the implication is that election fraud
>> doesn't bother you as long as the your party commits it.
>>
>> I do not agree with your first implication and I hope that I've erred
>> in understanding your second.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Andreas Schou <ophite at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:19 AM, No Weatherman
>> > <no.weatherman at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Dave:
>> >>
>> >> You're arguing that once ACORN commits fraud by registering dead
>> >> voters, they have a legal obligation to submit those fraudulent
>> >> registrations to the state.
>> >
>> > Yeah. They have a legal obligation (for instance, under the Pennsylvania
>> > Voter Registration Act) to account for and submit every voter
>> > registration
>> > card they receive from the state of Pennyslvania. This is to avoid the
>> > only
>> > kind of voter fraud there's actually documentation of: failure to submit
>> > voter registration cards of the party you don't like.
>> >
>> > -- ACS
>> >
>> >
>>
>> =======================================================
>>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>>               http://www.fsr.net
>>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>> =======================================================
>
>