[Vision2020] We've All Misunderstood the First Amendment in the World According to Palin

[Saundra Lund]

Gary Crabtree wrote:
"In the post I was responding to you implied that the Republican vice
presidential candidate was inept . . . "

Inept may be the understatement of the century!


Saundra Lund
Moscow, ID

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do
nothing.
~ Edmund Burke

***** Original material contained herein is Copyright 2008 through life plus
70 years, Saundra Lund.  Do not copy, forward, excerpt, or reproduce outside
the Vision 2020 forum without the express written permission of the
author.*****

-----Original Message-----
From: g. crabtree [mailto:jampot at roadrunner.com] 
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 7:03 AM
To: Paul Rumelhart
Cc: Saundra Lund; 'Vision 2020'
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] We've All Misunderstood the First Amendment in the
World According to Palin

I'm nor sure what "innuendo" you might be referring to as I was trying to be

very plain in what it was I was saying. Also, I have no interest in who it 
is that you or others on this list hate, it seems that you have managed to 
miss my point. (a total oversight, I'm sure)

In the post I was responding to you implied that the Republican vice 
presidential candidate was inept because she quiped that when the media 
takes her near every word and spins it as negative campaigning and that it 
puts a crimp in her freedom of speech. But, when your local hero has one 
lonely gomer mildly disagree with him and hauls out what appears to be the 
exact same argument writ small, mentioning it becomes innuendo and hate.

Your consistency is that of shifting sand.

g


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Rumelhart" <godshatter at yahoo.com>
To: "g. crabtree" <jampot at roadrunner.com>
Cc: "Saundra Lund" <sslund_2007 at verizon.net>; "'Vision 2020'" 
<vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2008 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] We've All Misunderstood the First Amendment in the

World According to Palin


> g. crabtree wrote:
>> Didn't one of our most esteemed on again, off again members make the same

>> argument?
>> /"I worry about the V. Of course, I’ve been unable to post without one 
>> pest or another for about two years now, but it seems that since its 
>> worked so well against me, various forces have decided to try it on 
>> everyone else. I lament what seems to me to be the loss of free speech in

>> Moscow."/
>> It appears to me that this fellow feels that his freedom of speech is 
>> being denied because he can't say any damn fool thing he wants without 
>> some peon who is nowhere near as smart or as cool as he is questioning 
>> him or, worse yet, disagreeing. This person has informed us that he is 
>> very intelligent and many of the regulars on this list have expressed 
>> their concurrence. With all this in mind I should think that Mrs. Palin 
>> would be promoted to at least the level of philosophy professor with all 
>> the respect and deference that lofty title entails.
>> g
>
> You'll have to forgive me. I suck at innuendo. I've also lost track of 
> exactly who hates who how much and for what reasons.
>
> Paul
>
>