[Vision2020] condemning rape redux/FLDS

[Sunil Ramalingam]

The good faith rule is just fine and dandy until their 'good faith' gets them into your house.  

Sunil

> To: ophite at gmail.com; kjajmix1 at msn.com; vision2020 at moscow.com
> From: thansen at moscow.com
> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:37:39 +0000
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] condemning rape redux/FLDS
> 
> The potential for "contaminated" evidence gathered subsequent to a phone 
> call that was determined to have originated from a falsely claimed source 
> has been discussed on several news sources, one of which was Nancy Grace 
> on Headline News when she interviewed several of the compound's attorneys.
> 
> Texas, apparently, has what is referred to as a "good faith" rule.  This 
> rule stipulates that, at the time of the search, if the police seriously 
> believe the source, which had led them to that location at that point and 
> time, to be honest and not misleading, evidence gathered as a result of 
> that search is valid and within Texas' rules of evidence.
> 
> Nancy Grace, and several other attorneys (to include a couple Texas 
> judges) feel that the argument is moot concerning non-admissability of the 
> evidence gathered from the compound.
> 
> Point, set, match.
> 
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------
> This message was sent by First Step Internet.
>            http://www.fsr.com/
> 
> 
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet, 
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.   
>                http://www.fsr.net                       
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20080424/d1ad3ef5/attachment.html