<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
The good faith rule is just fine and dandy until their 'good faith' gets them into your house. <br><br>Sunil<br><br>> To: ophite@gmail.com; kjajmix1@msn.com; vision2020@moscow.com<br>> From: thansen@moscow.com<br>> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:37:39 +0000<br>> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] condemning rape redux/FLDS<br>> <br>> The potential for "contaminated" evidence gathered subsequent to a phone <br>> call that was determined to have originated from a falsely claimed source <br>> has been discussed on several news sources, one of which was Nancy Grace <br>> on Headline News when she interviewed several of the compound's attorneys.<br>> <br>> Texas, apparently, has what is referred to as a "good faith" rule. This <br>> rule stipulates that, at the time of the search, if the police seriously <br>> believe the source, which had led them to that location at that point and <br>> time, to be honest and not misleading, evidence gathered as a result of <br>> that search is valid and within Texas' rules of evidence.<br>> <br>> Nancy Grace, and several other attorneys (to include a couple Texas <br>> judges) feel that the argument is moot concerning non-admissability of the <br>> evidence gathered from the compound.<br>> <br>> Point, set, match.<br>> <br>> Tom Hansen<br>> Moscow, Idaho<br>> <br>> <br>> ---------------------------------------------<br>> This message was sent by First Step Internet.<br>> http://www.fsr.com/<br>> <br>> <br>> =======================================================<br>> List services made available by First Step Internet, <br>> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. <br>> http://www.fsr.net <br>> mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com<br>> =======================================================<br></body>
</html>