[Vision2020] Don't change the subject DOUG

[J Ford]

Besides, isn't Polygamy a step BACKWARDS?  I mean, isn't that the way things 
USED to be in as in Abraham's day?

Or is it possible the Doug's have rewritten THAT part of his-story as well?


J  :]





>From: Joe Campbell <joekc at adelphia.net>
>To: vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: [Vision2020] Don't change the subject DOUG
>Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:38:16 -0700
>
>Doug,
>
>You didn't answer my question. I'll rephrase it since you changed the 
>subject.
>
>Is the denial of the Holocaust a "natural progression" after the rewriting 
>of the history of American slavery? Stay on topic, boy!
>
>For the record, in your post on polygamy you wrote only one sentence: 
>"Religious convictions aside, it seems like a natural progression of
>the 'marriage movement'."
>
>What is the marriage movement if it has nothing to do with gay marriage, 
>nor polygamy since that is the "progression"? So your claim that I "made a 
>rather illogical jump" by assuming that you were "attributing plural 
>marriage as next in a sequence of marriage progression, following gay 
>marriage" is just another lie in a tiresome sequence of lies. But since 
>there are four of you, I understand how difficult it is to keep your posts 
>straight.
>
>Nor did I say that I found the article on pologamy to be offensive. I 
>didn't read it. What I said was that I found you to be offensive. This last 
>post doesn't change my opinion on that matter either.
>
>--
>Joe Campbell
>
>=======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>                http://www.fsr.net
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>=======================================================

_________________________________________________________________
Get a preview of Live Earth, the hottest event this summer - only on MSN 
http://liveearth.msn.com?source=msntaglineliveearthhm