[Vision2020] Wilsonistas Gone Wild!!!!

[News of Christ Cult]

http://patrickpoole.blogspot.com/2006/02/wilsonistas-gone-wild.html


Thursday, February 16, 2006  Wilsonistas Gone Wild!!!! Following up on my
post from yesterday, The Mendacious Mullah of
Moscow<http://patrickpoole.blogspot.com/2006/02/mendacious-mullah-of-moscow.html>,
I've received a torrent of hate mail -- all of which curiously originates
from residents of Moscow, Idaho. The letters all follow along the same
lines, making me wonder if there isn't some "insert the adjective" webmail
form letter over at dougwils.com. The letters generally run as follows:

Dear Reformed Reprobate,

Greetings in Christ! I am a member at Christ Church/I'm a student at New St.
Andrews/I'm on staff at Logos Schools/I'm married to one of the Great
Leader's children, and I wanted you to know how much I would love to put the
serrated edge against your throat for daring to question the wisdom of our
Great Leader, but as a fellow brother/sister in Christ, I will refrain from
doing so (at least at the moment, you presbyterian pig). Our Great Leader
vanquishes his foes merely by the word of his power and pen, so where do you
get off saying negative things without having submitted yourself to the
higher knowledge that proceeds from our Great Leader's mouth and keyboard?

I just read on our Great Leader's blog his recent instructions not to speak,
hear, or think, let alone blog, about anything with reference to the Great
Leader's liquor distributor, friend and future CREC colleague, R.C. Sproul,
Jr.; and if it's on his blog, I believe it and that settles it. If fact, I
didn't even permit myself to think about it as I was just writing about it.
How dare you consider yourself a Christian and believe that you too can blog
on the same topics as the Great Leader!

But you take your spiritual rebellion even one step further and blaspheme
our Great Leader by challenging the infallibility of his version of events
in the matter that I'm not even allowed to remember. And how can you claim
to know any truth living so far away from the Moscow Mecca? Our Great Leader
only speaks truth, only thinks truth, and IS truth, you wretched
revisionist! If you have doubts, you should register your doubts with the
Great Leader's Judicial Committee, who will legitimate anything our Great
Leader says, including verifying any unsigned documents he might provide as
evidence to rebut your witness, in order to quickly dispel your heretical
notions about the Great Leader's unquestioned truthfulness.

If that doesn't convince you, your only recourse is to register an official
complaint with the Cult of Personality Committee of the Confederation of
Reformed Evangelical Cults, who's first task will be to examine if you first
followed Matthew 18 before you dared to question the Great Leader's
veracity. And they will show you no mercy, you covenant-breaking
non-paedo-communionist!

It is people like you that sow seeds of doubt amongst the weaker brothers
and sisters of the True Kirk and feed the evil that dare not be named (*Dr.
Terry Morin <http://www.terrymorin.com/>--ed.*). Since you posted your blog
article after our weekly Wednesday afternoon imprecatory prayer session, we
will have to wait another week before we pray down the Great Leader's
Righteous Justice upon you for your scurrilous sacrilege. My sincerest hope
in life is that you rot in eternal fires of Blog and Mablog for your crimes,
or are at least satirized as a macaroni dish in the forthcoming issue of *
Credenda/Agenda*. But even that terrible fate will not compare to the
eternal horror should the Great Leader set his steely gaze and his poisoned
pen upon you. Prepare to meet your fate, reprobate!

Peace in Christ and death to all infidels,

xxx

Again, this is *generally* how the hate mail runs, so I admit to taking some
literary license here. But anyone who has ever been on the working end of a
Wilsonista jihad will know that I'm not that far off the mark. While the
Great Leader is quite fond of repeatedly noting the "fellowship of the
grievance", aka the *Vast Anti-Doug Conspiracy*, this is far from a strictly
anti-Wilson sect.

It was last year that I began noticing whenever anything that could even be
slightly construed as negative was said on the Internet about the Sultan of
Subjectivity that the same cast of characters would magically appear out of
thin air to fiercely attack not just any criticism of Wilson, but savage the
critics themselves.

The best example I can remember was the hatchet-job that the Great Leader
engineered against Knox Seminary professor Cal Beisner in a WorldMagBlog
discussion <http://www.worldmagblog.com/blog/archives/014287.html>last April
(this is lengthy, but please bear with me).

At issue was a brief article <http://www.worldmag.com/articles/10576>published
by *WORLD* concerning the *Southern Slavery As It Was* plagarism flap
(follow the link and go down to "Doug Wilson and Slavery"). Wilson
immediately showed up on the scene in the comment section
<http://www.worldmagblog.com/blog/archives/014287.html>(Comment #7) to rake
*WORLD* over for daring to mention the flap and for not abiding by his
interpretation of the facts. In his opening comment, he attacked the
credibility of *WORLD* because they chose to quote someone he didn't like.
Here's his opening post in its entirey:
**

*"I have gone back and forth on whether to say anything, but it seems to me
that this is an venue where we can have a courteous discussion about this,
particularly since comments were invited. That said, the article was
extremely disappointing. World magazine weighed into a local controversy
when they simply didn't have the background on it (despite having plenty of
time). For local Christians here in Moscow, it is hard to swallow when our
fellow believers at World quote someone who lives in the Ward Churchill
universe as some kind of authority. I did not take this story as any kind of
attack on us, but as a news story it failed, at a number of points.
Disappointing. I don't want to have to start reading all World articles with
the nagging thought in the back of my mind -- do they do this kind of thing
in their other reporting? I hope not." Doug Wilson (Comment #7)*

Did you catch that sleight-of-hand? Anyone in academia is compared to Ward
Churchill. *WORLD* quotes someone in academia, so he is concerned about the
quality of all their reporting. How's that for charity? But this was just
the beginning.

In short order, Nate Wilson showed up (Comment #30) to attack someone who
questioned his father's very generous definition of plagarism. By the time
the Great Leader made his next significant statement (Comment #55), the
"Suffering Servant" messiah complex was in full bloom. The Wilsonistas had
already laid the rhetorical groundwork for that:

**

*"I'd say pastor Wilson is operating right in the footsteps of the Christ.
And if you had your way, I'll bet there's a nice bald hill somewhere on the
Palouse, where you would end his life just as the Pharisees ended those of
the Christ that he follows!" (Comment #49)*

*Anyone attacking Wilson was now a Pharisee re-crucifying Christ!* But hold
on; I'm not even getting started yet!

No sooner had someone cited the New St. Andrews catalog on plagarism
(Comment #63), then the Great Leader was back armed with a fable to explain
it all away (Comment #69). Ignore the man behind the curtian! When everyone
did not take the bait, he claimed to call it quits (Comment #80).

After that, Cal Beisner arrived (Comments #101 & 103) citing an
*ANTITHESIS*article that Wilson had written, "Wrestling with
Wesley<http://www.reformed.org/webfiles/antithesis/v2n1/ant_v2n1_Wesley.html>,"
where Wilson charged John Wesley with plagarism for treating texts in
exactly the same manner as Wilson/Wilkins had handled the disputed portions
of *SSAIW, *which, he was desperate to explain, was really carelessness, not
plagarism at all. Cal later cited another instance (Comment #132) where
scores of students had been expelled and had degrees revoked for the same
kind of text lifting that had occured with *SSAIW*.

In all fairness, Cal's comments were not an attack on Wilson and the charity
and friendship he has exhibited towards Wilson is well known. If anything,
Cal had been the most reasonable voice in the Auburn Avenue wars and went
out of his way to give Wilson, et al. a fair hearing by raising the funding
and chairing the the Auburn Avenue Colloquium to give those men ample
opportunity to explain their views. Additionally, Cal had a book published a
while ago by Canon Press, *Evangelical Heathenism*. With credentials like
that, it is difficult to cast him into the category of the "fellowship of
the grievance" or an "intolerista".

The plot thickened when Cal made the following statement with reference to
Wilson's book:
*

"Let me make my position clear: SSAIW is historical trash, as demonstrated
by a number of written critiques (including McKenzie's--which, along with
Wilson's response and McKenzie's rejoinder, I have read). It also makes the
stupid error of equating Southern black chattel slavery, which, founded on
manstealing, was sinful, with the types of slavery (bonded servanthood,
slavery to pay debts, slavery as punishment for crime, or slavery as
alternative to death in warfare) countenanced (under carefully regulated
conditions) in the Bible. But by lack of training in historical research, or
by mistakes in logic, or both, one may argue in substance what Wilkins and
Wilson argued while not being vulnerable to serious moral censure.
Plagiarism, for someone who, like Wilson, had demonstrated that he knew
better (in his essay on Wesley and the policies of NSA), is another
matter."(Comment #139)

*

Whether it was Cal's comment, or the appearance of the evil that dare not be
named (Dr. Terry Morin -- Comment #121), that provoked the following attack
on Cal, no one may ever know:

*Hello, I couldn't help it. I tried putting myself in time-out until I
calmed down, but I got loose when I wasn't looking, and so here I come,
cannon balling into the fracas.*

*The real disappointment is Cal Beisner, who ought to know better. How
tedious to see him be so dishonest with the facts. He is manipulating his
definitions to smear Doug. Either that, or he has absolutely no sense of
proportion or wisdom. I have sat on a number of disciplinary hearing
committees for plagiarism, and there is a big difference between someone who
has plagiarized and someone who has made a major gaffe in their citations.
One is carelessness and the other is deceit. I am completely baffled by
Beisner, a college instructor, and his refusal to make this distinction.
What a scary thought to be the student of a man who won't acknowledge the
difference. Or is there another motivation in trying to get a plagiarism
charge to stick against Doug?*

*Does anybody else think it is odd that all the hullabaloo is aimed at Doug,
when the portions of the work that are being featured in our various tirades
were all actually Wilkins' sections? Is it maybe because the point is not
plagiarism, but actually the chance to go after Wilson? Here's an
interesting parallel: Rose Huskey (who posted above) has made herself a
little cottage industry here in Moscow out of bringing charges against
anything that Doug Wilson touches. And she regularly insists that it has
nothing to do with her hatred for Doug Wilson; it is the principle of the
law that she is concerned about. But she has been provided with a number of
other local churches which are violating the same law (as she reads it) and
to the same degree, yet she turns them the blind eye. Beisner's singling out
of Wilson smacks of a similar zeal for righteousness.*

*Very principled.*

*By the way, I don't think there is any need to go after Wilkins. He has
handled the whole thing quite admirably and is a very honorable man. Wilkins
has the sort of wisdom to make the distinctions that Beisner is missing. I
only bring him in to point out the inconsistency of the men with the
Doug-complex.* (Comment #150)

Cal is "dishonest with the facts"; he was "manipulating his definitions to
smear Doug"; he had "no sense of proportion or wisdom"; he couldn't discern
the distinction between carelessness and deceit; he had a "Doug-complex".
The Wilsonista jihad was on.

What made this comment so interesting, apart from its' vicious and
condescending spirit, is that it bore a very familiar name: *Douglas
Wilson*. The email address it bore, however, was also familiar to
those who take
note of the Kirk Krusaders: bmerkle at nsa.edu. This email belongs to Ben
Merkle, Wilson's son-in-law. Remember, Wilson had said that he was taking
his leave of the discussion. What could possibly be going on? Surely some
machination of the *Vast Anti-Doug Conspiracy* was afoot and up to no good!

Immediately, one of Diotrephes Doug's devoted disciples and regular Blog and
Mablog commentors, Valerie <http://www.kyriosity.com/>, began attacking the
commentator who pointed out the bizarre scenario unfolding before the
readers, attempting to provide an explanation as to how such could have
"accidently" happened. In short order, Wilson himself reappeared out of thin
air to explain it all:

*This really is Doug Wilson, and I know I said I wasn't going to post
anymore. Events overtook me. Anyhow, Ben Merkle, my son-in-law, posted from
our computer at our home, and through an unfortunate computer deal, the post
that he wrote from here showed up over my name. Anyhow, I would like to take
this opportunity to accuse Ben of plagiarism, and demand a full
apology.*(Comment #157)

Yep, no coordinated attacks on Cal Beisner from the very heart of Moscow
Mecca to be found here! Just a keystone cops series of events! Following his
father-in-law's laughable lead, Merkle chimed in:

*Yipes. The earlier post, which begins with "Hello, I couldn't help it" was
written by me, Ben Merkle. I was visiting at Doug and Nancy's when I typed
it. I managed to get in my email address, but somehow missed that Doug's
name had automatically appeared in the name slot. It was me. I take full
credit for it. I hang my head way way low. *

*Wait. Hold on a second. Darn it, it happened again! Doug Wilson's name
hanging up there taking credit for somebody else's work. Plagiarist!
Holocaust denier!Horse thief!* (Comment #160)

Can you hear the nervousness in their laughter increasing? Wilson had to
keep the laughter going:

*No, wait. It was his writing, and my name, so I was the one guilty of
plagiarism on this one. Is that right? We need a determination from the line
judge.Seriously, that was not a set-up. Not done on purpose. Pure accident
and computer glitch. But still, my name showed up under Ben's writing.
Should I confess to plagiarism? Given some of the argumentation above, why
not?* (Comment #161)

Ha ha! Chuckle, chuckle! But no apology for the clearly coordinated backstab
to Cal Beisner. Demand all the charity you want--this was a planned hit.

Professional Wilson apologist Tim Bayly
<http://timbayly.worldmagblog.com/timbayly/>(follow the link to his blog and
check out the posts in recent weeks by he and his brother, David, shouting
down any criticsm of Wilson and Sproul, Jr.) showed up to cover-up the
hatchet job with a Wilson lovefest:

My brother, David, and I want to state publicly our support for Christ
Church, her pastors and elders. You may read our fuller comments on our blog
found here: http://timbayly.worldmagblog.com/timbayly/.

May God bless Pastor Doug Wilson as he confesses our most holy Faith.

Wilson is confessing "our most holy Faith", so his opponents must not be.
Confederation of Reformed Evangelical Cult (CREC) members quickly gathered
to join the happy chorus (Comments #222 & 223) to make sure that any
discussion of the bungled attack on Beisner was quickly shoved out of sight.
But the attacks on all members of the *Vast Anti-Doug Conspiracy* continued
over at Blog and Mablog for more than a week afterwards:

Boethius Counting His Toes
<http://www.dougwils.com/index.asp?Action=Anchor&CategoryID=1&BlogID=1040>(where
he describes his critics on WorldMagBlog as *"a weird coalition of lesbians,
evangelicals, secularists, anti-Auburn avenue folks, and pro-abortionists"*)

Can't Tell the Players Without a Scorecard
<http://www.dougwils.com/index.asp?Action=Anchor&CategoryID=1&BlogID=1042>(where
Wilson begins reciting his enemies list of those who posted, and many who
didn't, in the WorldMagBlog fracas)

Son of Can't Tell the Players
<http://www.dougwils.com/index.asp?Action=Anchor&CategoryID=1&BlogID=1044>(where
he spins the discussion and Beisner's comments by stating that *"Cal joined
up with overt enemies of Christ and His gospel, trying to make the same
point they were making, with no apparent sense of who his friends and
enemies actually were"; yeah, real charitable...)*
My Relationship with WORLD
<http://www.dougwils.com/index.asp?Action=Anchor&CategoryID=1&BlogID=1045>(where
he admits to brow-beating *WORLD* publisher, Joel Belz, before the
*WORLD*reporters even interviewed him to avoid having to address the
plagarism
issue; also note the ritual denunciation of "intoleristas", etc.) Me and
Steve
<http://www.dougwils.com/index.asp?Action=Anchor&CategoryID=1&BlogID=1046>(where
he wrings the admission of sloppiness out of Steve Wilkins that he refuses
to give regarding the plagarism in their *SSAIW* book) Gettysburg Do-Over
<http://www.dougwils.com/index.asp?Action=Anchor&CategoryID=1&BlogID=1047>(where
he revisits the criticisms from the WorldMagBlog discussion in an
environment that HE controls) Accuracy and Objectivity
<http://www.dougwils.com/index.asp?Action=Anchor&CategoryID=1&BlogID=1048>(another
sucker-punch to WORLD and the quality of their reporting) Biblical
Absolutism
<http://www.dougwils.com/index.asp?Action=Anchor&CategoryID=1&BlogID=1049>(addressing
Beisner, Wilson says that his interpretation is the only one truly faithful
to Scripture) Kick It Up a Notch
<http://www.dougwils.com/index.asp?Action=Anchor&CategoryID=1&BlogID=1050>(where
he thanks his supporters for doing his dirty work during the WorldMagBlog
brawl and takes his rightful place upon the *Credenda/Agenda* cross to
suffer for the sins of the "intoleristas")

If you've followed me thus far, I hope that I've identified the malicious
methodlogy of the Great Leader and his followers: *de l'attack, encore de
l'attack, et toujours de l'attack; et Le Mullah est sauve!*

When you see it spelled out like this in blow-by-blow detail as I've laid
out examining the coordinated attack on Cal Beisner, the abusive patterns
are easier to see. It truly is heart-breakingly tragic. Really. The blind,
unquestioning faith that the Wilsonistas place in their Great Leader makes
it all acceptable. So I have been hardly surprised by the hate mail I've
been getting from the Wilsonistas. This is the behavior they are taught is
normal; any attack on Wilson is by anti-Christs or those who are only
"objectively" Christian, but have aligned themselves with the forces of pure
evil. Even better, they have the whole theology and ecclesiastical system to
back it all up. Much like the Matrix.

I have some further thoughts and responses to some of issues raised in the
hate mail that I want to respond to, but the hour is late (or early, as the
case may be) and I'm going to take my leave to get some overdue rest. Stay
tuned!



-- 


Juanita Flores
Advocate for the Truth from Jesus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20070208/0c429598/attachment-0001.html