[Vision2020] Debate or Coward?

[Tom Hansen]

No, gc -

That is not what was said (or even implied).  What was suggested was a
simple on-air debate.  The part about impugning Doug Wilson's character,
that's pretty much up to him now, isn't it?

Joe stated that he would like to debate Doug Wilson.  I suggested that this
could be arranged by contacting Steve McGehee of KRFP.

Here, let me refresh your memory:
http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/2006-October/036165.html

Now, whether or not this debate becomes reality is (just like the impugning
thing) up to Doug Wilson.

Enough said.

Seeya round town, Moscow.

Tom Hansen
Vandalville, Idaho


*********************************************************************

"The greatness of every mighty organization embodying an idea in this world
lies in the religious fanaticism and intolerance with which, fanatically
convinced of its own right, it intolerantly imposes its will against all
others."

-	Adolf Hitler (1939)

*********************************************************************

-----Original Message-----
From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
On Behalf Of g. crabtree
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 6:35 AM
To: Matt Decker; privatejf32 at hotmail.com; metzler at moscow.com;
vision2020 at moscow.com
Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Debate or Coward?

Let's see if I've got this straight. Mike, Ralph, Joe, Tom, & Jackie all 
seem to think that it would be as amusing as a barrel of monkeys to get 
together with Doug Wilson and impugn his character, ministry and general 
overall fitness to draw breath and call it a debate. Generally debates 
revolve around a clearly defined topic. Here there appears to be no topic 
other than "we hate you and would like to cast aspersions at you in a public

forum." It's not a debate when someone is made to stand and answer for 
whatever silly, spurious charge someone can conjure up. Imagine my surprise 
if Doug doesn't fall all over himself in an effort to accept your generous 
offer. I mean really, what would be the up side for him? It's not like there

is an open mind in the group so achieving consensus would appear to be out 
of the question and any greater enlightenment for the community at large 
would be vanishingly small. Barrel of monkeys is correct. Wilson vs.

gc