[Vision2020] Debate or Coward?

[g. crabtree]

hansen, sorry if I got the line up wrong. Round one was to be Joe and Ralph 
with a follow up bout consisting of Metzler and his righteousness.(gonna 
need a big arena) Considering your and Jackie's contributions to the idea, I 
didn't think that you'd want to be left out. (perhaps some kind of kind of a 
midget wrestlers warm up bout?) Might I suggest that you seem to have put 
the horse before the cart with your suggestion that someone contact Mr. 
McGehee, shouldn't someone contact Wilson first?

gc
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Hansen" <thansen at moscow.com>
To: "'g. crabtree'" <jampot at adelphia.net>; "'Matt Decker'" 
<mattd2107 at hotmail.com>; <privatejf32 at hotmail.com>; <metzler at moscow.com>; 
<vision2020 at moscow.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 6:47 AM
Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Debate or Coward?


> No, gc -
>
> That is not what was said (or even implied).  What was suggested was a
> simple on-air debate.  The part about impugning Doug Wilson's character,
> that's pretty much up to him now, isn't it?
>
> Joe stated that he would like to debate Doug Wilson.  I suggested that 
> this
> could be arranged by contacting Steve McGehee of KRFP.
>
> Here, let me refresh your memory:
> http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/2006-October/036165.html
>
> Now, whether or not this debate becomes reality is (just like the 
> impugning
> thing) up to Doug Wilson.
>
> Enough said.
>
> Seeya round town, Moscow.
>
> Tom Hansen
> Vandalville, Idaho
>
>
> *********************************************************************
>
> "The greatness of every mighty organization embodying an idea in this 
> world
> lies in the religious fanaticism and intolerance with which, fanatically
> convinced of its own right, it intolerantly imposes its will against all
> others."
>
> - Adolf Hitler (1939)
>
> *********************************************************************
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> On Behalf Of g. crabtree
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 6:35 AM
> To: Matt Decker; privatejf32 at hotmail.com; metzler at moscow.com;
> vision2020 at moscow.com
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Debate or Coward?
>
> Let's see if I've got this straight. Mike, Ralph, Joe, Tom, & Jackie all
> seem to think that it would be as amusing as a barrel of monkeys to get
> together with Doug Wilson and impugn his character, ministry and general
> overall fitness to draw breath and call it a debate. Generally debates
> revolve around a clearly defined topic. Here there appears to be no topic
> other than "we hate you and would like to cast aspersions at you in a 
> public
>
> forum." It's not a debate when someone is made to stand and answer for
> whatever silly, spurious charge someone can conjure up. Imagine my 
> surprise
> if Doug doesn't fall all over himself in an effort to accept your generous
> offer. I mean really, what would be the up side for him? It's not like 
> there
>
> is an open mind in the group so achieving consensus would appear to be out
> of the question and any greater enlightenment for the community at large
> would be vanishingly small. Barrel of monkeys is correct. Wilson vs.
>
> gc
>
>
>
>