[Vision2020] RE: Big Fire from the Low-Lying Atwood with Wilson's approval

[J Ford]

Because of the fact that it was asked about by several people and his 
response was less than Christian.  ONE response was reported in my post.  
Doug made plenty others.

"Low-Lying" is a term like lilly-livered, yellow-bellied, yella-streak up 
the back, etc.  This is an act of a person that has little to recommend him 
- Atwood's chief "attribute."

YES, I would - however, the point is that a letter like that would NEVER had 
been sent by the Fire Department in the first place.

I suppose you consider it ok to harass people, embarrass them, make them 
apologize to two people then pay more than the "ball" tickets were worth?  
Get real.  This was a despicable manner in which a "christian" organization 
acted and YOU, as usual, think this "men's only club" is peachy-keene to do 
this....which says where you stand.  THIS is not how you treat people and 
make a claim of "community mindedness."

The polite and even gentlemanly thing would have been for Atwood, etc. to 
approach these people, QUIETLY, talked the situation over and exacted a 
promise to pay the next day - but certainly not to do this.

But the first step would to be a gentleman....



J  :]




>From: <deaconjames at verizon.net>
>To: privatejf32 at hotmail.com
>Subject: Big Fire from the Low-Lying Atwood with Wilson's approval
>Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:56:59 -0600 (CST)
>
>J,
>
>Just a couple questions for you.
>
>1) How do you know that this "Big Fire" came with Doug Wilson's approval?
>
>2) Why do you say that Atwood is "Low-Lying"?
>
>3) If it was the Fireman's Ball, and Doug Wilson and his wife attended 
>without paying, would you give the same response?
>
>Truly curious,
>
>Deacon James

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/