[Vision2020] Used Condom Found In Doug Wilson's Mailbox
Joan Opyr
joanopyr at moscow.com
Tue Jun 27 12:06:26 PDT 2006
On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Michael wrote:
>
> Friends,
>
> Below is Wilson’s latest public attack on his local critics; he is
> blaming them (or perhaps I should say “us” given his recent attacks on
> me) for the used condom recently placed in his mailbox. I want to
> keep this brief: Wilson is a very good politician and magical in his
> rhetorical ability. And he will stop at nothing to malign anyone that
> gets in his path. I want to therefore encourage everyone interested
> in bringing more publicity to Wilson and criticizing him to play fair
> and play good. Unfortunately, this is because we need to play safe.
> I should also note that when I arrived here over 10 years ago, it was
> understood that Doug Wilson already had a bad reputation with many
> locals and that emotions ran high because of his more cock-sure and
> sarcastic rhetorical style over offensive political issues. If you
> want to publicly criticize Wilson, you need to keep reminding folks of
> these kinds of things. Wilson’s primary strategy is to isolate his
> critic, even if it is only rhetorically and illusionary, and then
> attack. Don’t let him do this.
>
> Michael Metzler
>
Oh, for heavens' sake! Someone put a used or fake-used condom in Doug
Wilson's mailbox? Who would be so silly? Wilson's most vocal critics
are, like me, either rapidly approaching 40 or waving it goodbye in the
rear view mirror. My condoms-filled-cream-rinse days are long over.
Just for the record, I also gave up cow-tipping at the NCSU Vet School
farms at about the same time -- 1985, I think it was.
It's good that you've warned the ridiculous, Michael, but I honestly
don't think that the ridiculous reside among us so-called intoleristas.
When was the last time any of Doug Wilson's middle-aged critics played
a practical joke? And, really, when have any of us have "created an
atmosphere" in which condom-bombing would be encouraged? The Wilson
critics I know are intellectual nerds; we're the kind of people who
read theological, philosophical, political and economic tracts for fun.
We don't alter the Welcome to Moscow signs to read Welcome to
Hooterville. We don't send out fake faxes purporting to be from the UI
English Department offering a symposium on naked boobies. We also
don't mail seven-page anonymous threats to First Step Internet. Those
are all Wilson tricks.
Don't get me wrong: no one should find anything in his or her mailbox
but mail. I am genuinely sorry that Doug found a condom full of Breck
or mayonnaise or Hidden Valley Ranch. But is this really of interest
to the police? Is this of interest to the blogging world? Is this a
sign and wonder of a vast intolerista conspiracy? Or is finding that
you are the butt of a practical joke the likely consequence of playing
far too many such jokes yourself?
Several months ago, someone smeared dog crap in the air intake slits on
my car, just beneath the windshield wipers. What did I do? I washed
it out. And then washed it out some more. What I did not do was climb
onto a blog and denounce my intolerant critics at New St. Andrews and
Anselm House. I didn't and don't blame them because I don't know that
they did it. Why suspect where there is no evidence? I also didn't
call the cops. You speak your mind, and you take your chances. The
doggie doo was a shame -- and it stank like seven hells -- but I didn't
call the rozzers.
Perhaps I should have. But I have real things to worry about. The
Army of God is still on my ass for daring to write unflattering things
about their very own serial bomber, Eric Rudolph. I'm getting bizarre
hate mail from someone pretending to be the late Joey Ramone. And you
want to talk about weird? Free speech cadvocates, Dale Courtney and
Princess Annie Fanny, have accused me of resorting to "brute force
tactics" for removing a comment on the New West website posted by
someone who claimed to an "out pederast" by the name of Camille Saint
Saens. (You may recognize the name. Saint Saens composed Carnival of
the Animals and then died. In 1921.) The comment was removed because
it turns out that "Camille" was posting from a faked-up email address
-- one that caused a real website and a real website owner actual harm.
Bill London wrote a few days ago about spoofed emails using his name.
Is this worse than the old condom in the mailbox trick? I think so.
Considerably worse.
Joan Opyr/Auntie Establishment
www.joanopyr.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 4831 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060627/4746de87/attachment.bin
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list