[Vision2020] NSA CUP appeal hearing/Kimmel/Ament/Pall
Donovan Arnold
donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com
Fri Jun 2 07:14:44 PDT 2006
I agree with Jim insofar as that a person should not recuse themselves simply because they have an opinion. However, I do think that someone that is suppose to be making a judgment that impacts many people monetarily should be open minded about the issue. If someone feels that they dislike a group or organization so intently, I think the responsible thing to do is recuse yourself. If you hate or love your neighbor, and you are called to jury duty to hear a case against them, do you think you could openly listen to all the facts and make a fair unbiased decision? If so, you are fine, if you could never vote not guilty, or guilty if you love your neighbor, regardless of the facts presented, you need to step aside.
Take Care,
_DJA
Jim Meyer <m1e2y3e4 at moscow.com> wrote: All,
What short memory some of us have...Remember Paul Kimmel and his alleged
conflicts of interest having to do with Christ Church?
The legal definition of conflict of interest means FINANCIAL conflict of
interest, not conflict of opinions. I would be very, very disappointed
to see Aaron Ament recuse himself (as I was with Linda Pall when she
recused herself concerning Wal-Mart (1).
I say to both Aaron and Linda, be leaders, don't be wimps. I didn't vote
for a wimp. I didn't vote for someone who doesn't have the courage of
his or her belief. The kind of person I voted for would stand up against
those who would take advantage of the community for selfish gain. The
kind of person I voted for wouldn't back down in the face practiced
lying and subtle manipulation. Like a good parent, the person I voted
for would call out a lie and cause discomfort rather than be party to
the lie and thus encouraging more lies. I urge you both to continue to
fight for what you believe is right for the community. Keep up the good
work both of you.
I'll end by saying that it is personal belief of mine that to be
unnecessarily antagonistic is to be polarizing without being productive.
Lack of tact is not, however, a problem solved by recusal. I am sure
tact is gained through experience; that is the solution. Let us put
experience to work and recusal to rest unless, of course, you want to
revisit Paul Kimmel's past alleged conflicts of interest.
Jim Meyer
(1) / Daily News By Ryan Bentley, Daily News staff writer
Published: 05-27-2006/ "Councilwoman Linda Pall recused herself due to a
previous comment she had made while discussing Wal-Mart with a member of
the Gene Thompson family.I said, Boy, I sure hope youre not planning
a Wal-Mart out there and in no uncertain terms I said it was a
terrible idea, Pall said."
_____________________________________________________
List services made available by First Step Internet,
serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
http://www.fsr.net
mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060602/0bafce99/attachment.htm
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list