[Vision2020] (no subject)

[Michael]

J,

 

I was using sarcasm through much of my post (e.g. Enemy); sorry for not
being more clear.  As for women: I think I remember Gier talking about
Christian missionaries as responsible for the education of women in India
(back when I was his student).  And 'going to school' is a bit separate from
'no education' I would think.  As a side note: I quoted De Tocqueville
months ago about the independency, strength, and education he saw in America
(in comparison to Europe I think). And as for 'not loved': I'm speaking
again sarcastically regarding the private-schooling parent's potential
attitude towards those children in the public schools-not my money!

 

Michael

 

 

Normally, I am very supportive of you and your view points, but:

 

A.  Define "Enemy's"

B.  Did you mean to imply that children of those not "evangelized" are not
loved?

C.  Based on what do you say " Missional Christians have usually been
identified more with educating the women and children of non-Christian and
poverty stricken cultures?" when for a large part of the world women are not
allowed to be educated?  For that matter, in this country there were several
groups of people that were not uniformily allowed to go to school until that
last 100 (+/-) years.

 

I agree that DF is off (when isn't he) with his statements and beliefs, but
your's are confusing this time around.

 

 

J  :]

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060225/413ce910/attachment.htm