[Vision2020] V2020 Question: RE: Wilsonvile in trouble?

[Deacon James]

Wayne,

Thanks for bringing out the crazy fonts again. Your emails aren't nearly as
fun to read when you leave them out.

Deacon

On 8/25/06, Art Deco <deco at moscow.com> wrote:
>
>  Saundra writes:
>
> "...but my concern and questions is:  isn't there *anything* we can do
> about this shameful tactic of naming/identifying underage children on V2020
> in an attempt to intimidate by these two reprobates."
> We are just seeing the mindless ovine cult toadies following the
> Cultmaster's manipulations which he learned from author Robert Greene (*The
> 48 Laws of Power* and* Seduction*), a most immoral writer and one whose
> urgings and advice are about as unchristian as it gets.
>
> *Advice:  Ignore the cult toadies and their dumbs.*  *Be very, very
> thankful your children will not grow up to be like them or the Cultmaster.
> *
>
> W.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Saundra Lund" <sslund at adelphia.net>
> To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 10:15 AM
> Subject: [Vision2020] V2020 Question: RE: Wilsonvile in trouble?
>
> > [My apologies in advance if this shows up twice -- the first seems to
> have
> > disappeared into cyberspace.  SL]
> >
> > Visionaries:
> >
> > Is it just me, or is anyone else disturbed by the Kirk contingent's
> newest
> > strategy of snarkily trotting out the names of underage children (they
> > aren't the parents of) on V2020 to attack V2020 posters?
> >
> > To me, it seems absolutely despicable and inappropriate and downright
> creepy
> > . . . and not just because they've never produced a shred of evidence
> here
> > to support their accusations that J Ford and Jackie Woolf are one and
> the
> > same.
> >
> > I understand that V2020 is an open unmoderated forum and it's something
> > we've discussed more than once over the past few years, but this new
> trend
> > of the Kirk's to name/identify children not their own is just about a
> bridge
> > too far, IMHO.
> >
> > This behavior seems particularly loathsome given the Kirk's bloated
> whining
> > right here on V2020 during our recent discussions following the
> revelations
> > of the crimes of two child molesters affiliated with the Kirk.  It was
> > wrong, we were told, to even *discuss* the crimes because it would
> somehow
> > cause harm to the many unnamed victims and their families.
> >
> > This seems to me yet another example of the double-standard the Kirk had
> > become infamous for:  Kirk children are more worthy of being protected
> and
> > treated appropriately than are the children of the rest of the
> community.
> >
> > Personally, I *know* God is most unhappy with their tactic (and any
> > religious leader worth his/her salt would offer appropriate counsel
> > regarding the error of their ways), but my concern and questions is:
> isn't
> > there *anything* we can do about this shameful tactic of
> naming/identifying
> > underage children on V2020 in an attempt to intimidate by these two
> > reprobates?
> >
> >
> > Saundra Lund
> > Moscow, ID
> >
> > The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to
> do
> > nothing.
> > - Edmund Burke
> >
> >>
>
> =======================================================
>  List services made available by First Step Internet,
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
>               http://www.fsr.net
>          mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
> =======================================================
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060825/036a3aba/attachment.htm