<font style="color: rgb(102, 0, 204);" size="4">Wayne,</font><br><br><font style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-style: italic;" size="6">Thanks</font> <font style="color: rgb(51, 51, 255); text-decoration: underline;" size="4">
for bringing out</font> <span style="color: rgb(204, 51, 204);">the</span> <font style="font-weight: bold;" size="6"><span style="color: rgb(255, 153, 0);">crazy fonts</span></font> <font style="color: rgb(102, 102, 204);" size="4">
again. Your</font> <font style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" size="6"><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">emails</span></font> <font style="color: rgb(102, 255, 255); font-weight: bold;" size="4">aren't nearly as fun to read
</font> <font style="text-decoration: underline; color: rgb(153, 153, 0); font-style: italic;" size="6">when you leave them out.</font><br><br><font style="color: rgb(255, 102, 0); font-weight: bold;" size="4">Deacon</font>
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/25/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Art Deco</b> <<a href="mailto:deco@moscow.com">deco@moscow.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<div>
<div><font size="4">Saundra writes:</font></div>
<div><font size="4"></font> </div>
<div><font size="4">"...but my concern and questions is: isn't there
*anything* we can do about this shameful tactic of naming/identifying underage
children on V2020 in an attempt to intimidate by these two
reprobates."<br></font></div>
<div><font size="4">We are just seeing the mindless ovine cult toadies following
the Cultmaster's manipulations which he learned from author Robert Greene
(<em>The 48 Laws of Power</em> and<em> Seduction</em>), a most immoral writer
and one whose urgings and advice are about as unchristian as it gets.
</font></div>
<div><font size="4"></font> </div>
<div><font size="4"><strong><font color="#ff0000"><font color="#000000">Advice:</font> Ignore the cult toadies and their
dumbs.</font></strong> </font><font color="#0000ff" size="5"><strong>Be very,
very thankful your children will not grow up to be like them or the
Cultmaster.</strong></font></div>
<div><font size="4"></font> </div>
<div><font size="4">W.</font></div>
<div><font size="4"></font> </div>
<div><font size="4"></font> </div>
<div></div><div><span class="q">----- Original Message -----
<div>From: "Saundra Lund" <<a href="mailto:sslund@adelphia.net" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">sslund@adelphia.net</a>></div>
<div>To: <<a href="mailto:vision2020@moscow.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">vision2020@moscow.com</a>></div></span></div><div><span class="e" id="q_10d4689635b24a5e_2">
<div>Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 10:15 AM</div>
<div>Subject: [Vision2020] V2020 Question: RE: Wilsonvile in
trouble?</div></span></div><div></div></div><div><span class="e" id="q_10d4689635b24a5e_4">
<div><br></div><font size="4"><font size="3">> [My apologies in advance if this
shows up twice -- the first seems to have<br>> disappeared into
cyberspace. SL]<br>> <br>> Visionaries:<br>> <br>> Is it just
me, or is anyone else disturbed by the Kirk contingent's newest<br>> strategy
of snarkily trotting out the names of underage children (they<br>> aren't the
parents of) on V2020 to attack V2020 posters?<br>> <br>> To me, it seems
absolutely despicable and inappropriate and downright creepy<br>> . . . and
not just because they've never produced a shred of evidence here<br>> to
support their accusations that J Ford and Jackie Woolf are one and the<br>>
same.<br>> <br>> I understand that V2020 is an open unmoderated forum and
it's something<br>> we've discussed more than once over the past few years,
but this new trend<br>> of the Kirk's to name/identify children not their own
is just about a bridge<br>> too far, IMHO.<br>> <br>> This behavior
seems particularly loathsome given the Kirk's bloated whining<br>> right here
on V2020 during our recent discussions following the revelations<br>> of the
crimes of two child molesters affiliated with the Kirk. It was<br>>
wrong, we were told, to even *discuss* the crimes because it would
somehow<br>> cause harm to the many unnamed victims and their
families.<br>> <br>> This seems to me yet another example of the
double-standard the Kirk had<br>> become infamous for: Kirk children
are more worthy of being protected and<br>> treated appropriately than are
the children of the rest of the community.<br>> <br>> Personally, I *know*
God is most unhappy with their tactic (and any<br>> religious leader worth
his/her salt would offer appropriate counsel<br>> regarding the error of
their ways), but my concern and questions is: isn't<br>> there
*anything* we can do about this shameful tactic of naming/identifying<br>>
underage children on V2020 in an attempt to intimidate by these two<br>>
reprobates?<br>> <br>> <br>> Saundra Lund<br>> Moscow, ID<br>>
<br>> The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to
do<br>> nothing.<br>> - Edmund Burke<br></font>> <br>></font><font size="4">></font></span></div><div></div>
</div><br>=======================================================<br> List services made available by First Step Internet,<br> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.<br> <a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://www.fsr.net" target="_blank">
http://www.fsr.net</a><br> mailto:<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:Vision2020@moscow.com">Vision2020@moscow.com</a><br>=======================================================
<br><br></blockquote></div><br>