[Vision2020] D and Mt.View

[roger hayes]

> I think the city has viewed Mt. View as an arterial for the increasing 
> numbers of houses on the outskirts of Moscow.
> As a person who frequently crosses this intersection on foot and by 
> bicycle, I think a 4 way stop sign at D and Mt. View is a good idea 
> indeed. People tend to really zip through that area. It will, however, 
> change the nature of Mt. View from commuting arterial to urban street. 
> But given all the schools, the pool, and rec. centers in the area, the 
> change will not be a bad thing.

Roger Hayes


> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:03:00 -0700
> From: "Bill London" <london at moscow.com>
> Subject: [Vision2020] 4-ways on D Street
> To: <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> Message-ID: <009c01c6c312$19117540$0200a8c0 at techlab>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> There is a 4-way stop at D and Hayes.
> Why is there not a 4-way stop at D and Mountainview?
> BL
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Tom Ivie
>   To: Tom & Liz Ivie
>   Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 12:19 PM
>   Subject: City Council Meeting (D & Mt. View intersection -4way stop)
>
>
>   It is #8 on the agenda so it may be kind of late.
>
>
>   AGENDA
>   MOSCOW CITY COUNCIL
>   SPECIAL MEETING
>   Monday, August 21, 2006                                              
>                                                 7:00 p.m.
>   City Hall Council Chambers
>    206 East Third Street, Second Floor
>
>   8.       Four-way Stop at D Street and Mountain View - Les MacDonald
>   At City Council request, staff has been reviewing the establishment 
> of a four-way stop at the "D" and Mountain View Road intersection. An 
> in-house traffic study looked at vehicular volumes, accidents, turning 
> movements and level of service at this location to determine if this 
> action is warranted. This item was originally presented to the Public 
> Works Committee in April 2006 as a report.  This was reviewed by the 
> Public Works/Finance Committee who favored a four-way stop but wanted 
> the item to be considered by the full Council.
>
>         ACTION:  Direct staff as deemed appropriate.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 2130 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/vision2020/attachments/20060819/be549915/attachment.bin