[Vision2020] Donovan's allegations

[Sunil Ramalingam]

Donovan,

I won't bore everyone with the variety of jobs I've had, or the different 
ones I've done at the same time.  I don't call others simpletons or asses 
because they're not lawyers.  If you were a lawyer, based on your comments 
and behavior, you'd qualify as both.

Now, since you keep making these comments about my defense of terrorists and 
sworn enemies of the US, please explain what you mean, using specific 
examples from my posts.

If you can't do that, perhaps you should wait till you have evidence before 
running your mouth.

I really don't know what you mean by your accusation.  Let me see, I oppose 
the war in Iraq.  So do you.  I think our middle east policy is a disaster.  
Is that a defense of terrorists?

I oppose the Administration's refusal or unwillingness to apply the Geneva 
Conventions to its prisoners.  I think the Guantanamo prison is deplorable.  
I don't know how that translates into your allegations.  Explain to me. 
Perhaps I'm the simpleton.

Sunil


>From: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
>To: Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com>,  'Sunil Ramalingam' 
><sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>, vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Minimum wage
>Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Tom Hansen writes:
>
>   "I can honestly state that Sunil  Ramalingam DOES NOT restrict his 
>services to terrorists and/or enemies of the United States."
>
>   "RESTRICT".  You are stating  than that he does lend his services to 
>terrorists  and enemies of the state? Oh course I wasn't talking about 
>Sunil's  professionalism as a lawyer, I was talking about his behavior on  
>Vision2020. Perhaps if you have built a lifetime buddy relationship  with 
>Sunil you should not be on a jury where he is a lawyer on the  case.
>
>  Sunil, seems as though even your "defenders" are  admitting as much. 
>Also, yes I am a simpleton. Unfortunately, not all  of us can be lawyers, 
>most of us "dumb asses" or "simpletons" as you  refer to us, have to have 
>jobs that produce something positive in  society. I am also happy that you 
>are able to have a conversation and  not be a smart ass to someone you know 
>that doesn't hate Mr. Wilson ( I  only hope this person wasn't someone that 
>named Jackie, because she  isn't pro-Wilson.) That must be a big step for 
>you. Congratulations!
>
>   I Wish the Best for You,
>
>   _DJA
>
>   PS. Hansen, I cannot believe you were unable to get out of jury duty  
>four times. Just say you think the guy is GUILTY cause you saw the  whole 
>thing. It works everytime. : )
>
>  PSS Hansen, don't write  back saying how you wanted to serve because you 
>thought it was your  patriotic duty, blah blah blah, etc.
>