[Vision2020] More on Trinitarian "skylarking"
chasuk at gmail.com
Sat Oct 8 17:39:18 PDT 2005
On 10/8/05, melyndahuskey at earthlink.net <melyndahuskey at earthlink.net> wrote:
> I have to disagree with Chasuk here--the letter is more confused than it is
> funny. Since Intelligent Design is simply a version of creationism, it's
> analogous to the older earth-centered cosmology. Heliocentrism, like
> evolution, is a scientific theory.
I'm not saying that I find the prank uproariously, knee-slappingly
funny (it barely registers a grin), but I do find it funny from the
point of view of the poster: I understand why he or she intended it to
be funny, and I respond automatically, despite the confusion revealed
by the letter (which Rose has correctly diagnosed). When my children
were younger, I would laugh at their jokes. Not all of them were
funny, but I couldn't help myself.
More information about the Vision2020