[Vision2020] More on Trinitarian "skylarking"

[Chasuk]

On 10/8/05, melyndahuskey at earthlink.net <melyndahuskey at earthlink.net> wrote:
> I have to disagree with Chasuk here--the letter is more confused than it is
> funny.  Since Intelligent Design is simply a version of creationism, it's
> analogous to the older earth-centered cosmology.  Heliocentrism, like
> evolution, is a scientific theory.

I'm not saying that I find the prank uproariously, knee-slappingly
funny (it barely registers a grin), but I do find it funny from the
point of view of the poster: I understand why he or she intended it to
be funny, and I respond automatically, despite the confusion revealed
by the letter (which Rose has correctly diagnosed).  When my children
were younger, I would laugh at their jokes.  Not all of them were
funny, but I couldn't help myself.