[Vision2020] Doing Kai's work for him

[Donovan Arnold]

Mr. Hansen writes,

"According to Mr. Dickison, attorney for NSA. . ."

WOW! Mr. Hansen is using Mr. Dickison as a factual
source of information!

Mr. Hansen is now admitting that Mr. Dickison is
correct. What a 180 degree turn around from all the
rhetoric he has been spewing over the last two years.
Which ever way the wind it blowing right Mr. Hansen? 
 
Mr. Dickison is a liar and a crook when he says
something you disagree with. But when he says
something that validates your point, well then, he is
a sterling reference of indisputable information
supporting the facts. How convenient! 

So Mr. Hansen, why don't you publish the entire NSA
zoning meeting, and reconnect the link on you website
by Nick Gier concerning NSA accreditation?

I got a sneaking suspicion as to why you do not? Care
to guess what that suspicion might be?

Take Care,

Donovan J Arnold
 


--- Tom Hansen <thansen at moscow.com> wrote:
> Let's put this to rest, ok?
> 
> According to Mr. Dickison, attorney for NSA (as
> recorded in April 2003 at
> the Latah County Board of Equalization hearing
> concerning NSA's application
> for tax-exempt status):
> 
> http://www.tomandrodna.com/temp/NSA_Accred.mp3
> 
> (approximately 100 kilobytes)
> 
> This shouldn't leave any doubts about . . . well . .
> . judge for yourself.
> 
> Tom Hansen
> Moscow, Idaho
> 
> 
> 
> We could learn a lot from crayons: some are sharp,
> some are pretty, some are
> dull, some have weird names, and all are different
> colors....but they all
> exist very nicely in the same box. 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vision2020-bounces at moscow.com
> [mailto:vision2020-bounces at moscow.com]
> On Behalf Of Donovan Arnold
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 4:41 PM
> To: joanopyr at earthlink.net; Vision2020 Moscow
> Subject: Re: [Vision2020] Doing Kai's work for him
> 
> Joan,
> 
> When did NSA become accredited??
> 
> Huh? Are you ever going to answer that with anything
> other then they have the same certificate as Logos
> and
> St. Mary's Elementary school, therefore all of their
> classes are approved even though they are not?
> 
> There is only ONE reason for being for this
> interpretation of the law, and that is BIGOTRY.
> 
> Further, it certainly is discrimination in terms of
> enforcement.
> 
> Take Care,
> 
> Donovan J Arnold
> 
> 
> 
> 


		
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html