[Vision2020] Moscow City Council Ignores Due Process

[Donovan Arnold]

Mr. Huskey,

You wrote, "I did not see the city take any property
away from anyone."

If you own a repair shop in Moscow and the government
says you still own all the stuff in the plant, the
building, and the rights to the building, but you can
no longer operate as a repair shop, or any shop, you
lost property. You lost your income, you lost all the
money you paid for permits, you lost the furnishings,
all the installation of equipment, anything with an
address and phone number on it, etc. Income is
property, including any permits, and are property
according to state law Mr. Huskey. So what you really
meant was, you do not understand what property or loss
of value of property means.

Second, I do not see the point of bringing up
Cleveland if you agree that it is wrong to take
property without giving the property owner the ability
to present their case and protect their property. You
once again, made my case. Might I also point out, this
instance, and the instance in the recent Supreme Court
Ruling, are not the same.

Finally, you never answered the question of if you
thought me and city(or county to please Mary Opyr as
though the city could not annex your property and most
likely will in the next few years) had the right to
decide how you could use your property without you
being involved with the decision as due process. Is
there a reason for this?

Donovan J Arnold 

--- DonaldH675 at aol.com wrote:

> Mr. Arnold,
>  
> Clearly we were at different hearings. I did not see
> the city take any  
> property away from anyone. All they said was that
> NSA cannot be in the central  
> business district. Clearly they still own the
> property.
>  
> Secondly had you been following the Supreme Court
> decisions you would have  
> seen that last week the United States Supreme Court
> upheld Cleveland, Ohio's  
> right to take private property, i.e. private
> residences, and give/sell it to  
> another private entity i.e. ,a developer, for a
> development that the city  
> deemed a higher public interest. So much for a
> private citizens "inalienable  
> right" to his property. By the way I strongly
> disagree with the decision but  that 
> doesn't hold much water against the power of the U.
> S. Supreme Court.
>  
> Don Huskey
> >
_____________________________________________________
>  List services made available by First Step
> Internet, 
>  serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994. 
>  
>                http://www.fsr.net                   
>    
>           mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com