[Vision2020] Fortunately Phil Roderick and his Allies were Wrong
Carl Westberg
carlwestberg846 at hotmail.com
Wed Jun 1 11:44:26 PDT 2005
Well, Donovan, now that you've straightened the unwashed masses out on
taxes, I need your assistance on a tricky matter. I've going to assist in
an as yet untried, unproven brain transplant procedure. Dr. Sarah Bellum
and I will be replacing the brain of an Ultra-liberal with that of a
thoughtful, extremely knowledgeable young former ASUI senator, hoping it
will help the poor, benighted Ultra-liberal come to his senses. My question
is: would you recommend making the incision near the brainstem, the
cerebellum, the hypothalamus, or the cerebrum? Most importantly, should we
use a phillips or flat-head screwdriver?
Carl Westberg Jr.
>From: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
>To: Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>, predator75 at moscow.com,
> vision2020 at moscow.com
>Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Fortunately Phil Roderick and his Allies were
>Wrong
>Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Sunil,
>
>There may be a new tax, but if your taxes overall go
>down that to me is a tax decrease. Now you can argue
>that if your taxes decrease that is a increase because
>of the legal and political garbage behind it, but it
>is still a decrease in your taxes. $95 instead of $100
>is less, not more. A zero tax would be less than $100
>too. But $95 is still less than $100 according to my
>wallet.
>
>If you want to argue that $100 is less than $95
>because $0.00 is less than $95 you are welcome to do
>so but it is not an argument worthy of my time.
>
>
>Donovan J Arnold
>
>--- Sunil Ramalingam <sunilramalingam at hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>
>---------------------------------
>
>Donovan,
>
>Since I lack Dan's big brain I am also having trouble
>following your tax cut logic. You write that the levy
>they're paying on NOW is set to expire. Once that
>happens, that bill is gone. They have then agreed to
>a new tax. Now, if they had voted it down, they
>wouldn't pay any tax at all. That would be a zero tax
>as far as levies are concerned. To use your example,
>they'd go from a $100 tax to a $0.00 tax
>
>Since they've agreed to a new tax, isn't that a tax
>increase? Haven't they gone from $0.00 to $95, to use
>your example again?
>If I have this wrong, please type your response
>slowly, so that I can follow you.
>
>Sunil
>
>
> >From: Donovan Arnold <donovanjarnold2005 at yahoo.com>
> >To: Dan Carscallen <predator75 at moscow.com>,
>"'Vision 2020'" <vision2020 at moscow.com>
> >Subject: RE: [Vision2020] Fortunately Phil Roderick
>and his Allies were Wrong
> >Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >Dan, Dan, Dan. . .
> >
> >No. That is not what I am saying, and if you read
>even
> >just the first few lines of the article you would
> >understand.
> >
> >The old levy that the residents are still paying on
> >NOW is set to expire. This new levy will cost less
> >than the one set to expire. So they will be a getting
> >tax cut.
> >
> >
> >Think of it like this, you are paying $100 on an old
> >levy, with the levy that passed it will only be $95.
> >That is a tax cut of $5. The old levy wanted you to
> >pay $110, which failed. It is pretty simple to figure
> >out why this one passed. It had nothing to do with
> >people in Moscow hating children and people in
> >Boundary county loving children as Wayne concludes.
> >
> >Still hoping you will use your "thinking
>thingamabob".
> >
> >Donovan J Arnold
> >
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Yahoo! Mail Mobile
>Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
>http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
>
>_____________________________________________________
> List services made available by First Step Internet,
> serving the communities of the Palouse since 1994.
> http://www.fsr.net
> mailto:Vision2020 at moscow.com
>¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
More information about the Vision2020
mailing list